Hello!
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:34:26PM +0100, Peter Samek wrote:
> For some time I wondered why setting Setup -> Language -> Slovak or
> setting LANG to sk_SK produced no effect in the new version (0.9..).
> Finally I took a look at the package content and found out that the
> locale files are
On Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 11:39:26AM -0400, Stephen J. Carpenter wrote:
> good point...and who even says version numbers have to work in that way
> anyway?
> Many individual programs have versions like "19980420" ...or what
> if I want to start with 100 and count down ;) or increase it by powers of
On Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 02:46:38AM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
> > Major versions for ONLY major changes, minors for minor, and
> > not entering the version-number-hype-marketing-bandwagon is
> > the hackers' view of version numbers.
>
> What constitutes a major change is fuzzy. I think it shoul
On Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 01:53:07AM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 1998, Joey Hess wrote:
> True, but kernel version is not as important as libc version and
> filesystem layout. Kernel version really means very little. It simply
> provides an easy method of very basic configuration man
Hello,
(It's probably not a question of the package and debian, but..)
So snmpd. It seems - and some fellow admins reported that they noticed the
same effetct - that snmpd's ifInOctets and ifOutOctets are incorrect. More
specifically, they are usually the half of the real values, and in my case
i
On Mon, 2 Feb 1998, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Are there any packages/programs/whatever that provide nice, readable
> summaries for the various logs in /var/log? Things along the lines of
> the daily Usenet summaries that inn produces, but for things
> such as apache, inetd, mail, the ip paranoia daem
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > [PAP not working with ppp 2.3.2]
> > > # magic fix
> > > * * "" *
>
> > This magic fix doesn't work on 2.3.2; I tried it before and I tried it
> > again.
>
> Package: ppp
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> > > pppd[24325]: pppd 2.3.2 started by LOGIN, uid 0
> > [...]
> > > pppd[24325]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="pierre" password=""]
> > > pppd[24325]: PAP authentication failure for pierre
> > > pppd[24325]: sent [PAP AuthNak id=0x1 "Login incorrect"]
> >
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> pppd[24325]: pppd 2.3.2 started by LOGIN, uid 0
[...]
> pppd[24325]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="pierre" password=""]
> pppd[24325]: PAP authentication failure for pierre
> pppd[24325]: sent [PAP AuthNak id=0x1 "Login incorrect"]
> pppd[24325]: sent [LCP
On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
I have exactly the same question! Upgraded from 2.2.0f to 2.3.2 and PAP
stopped working from /etc/shadow. I thought it's libpam0g but after
installing them all it still does not work.
If you - or anyone - get the answer I'd be very interested as well!
> I'm
Hello,
Am I right to see that there is no gated debian package?
(please cc email on me)
bye,
peter
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Hello,
Using mgetty and autoppp utmp/wtmp contains the given string (now a_ppp)
instead of the real username. Is there a way to set it to the real user or
I'm stucked at grepping the data from the logfile?
thx,
Peter
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[E
On Mon, 24 Nov 1997, Scott Ellis wrote:
> > I'm about upgrading to hamm, probably in the middle of it. THe system
> > works and no problems detected at all until I realised that my 'last' is
> > broken.
[...]
> The format of the utmp/wtmp file has changed between libc5 and libc6. The
> version
Hello,
I'm about upgrading to hamm, probably in the middle of it. THe system
works and no problems detected at all until I realised that my 'last' is
broken. 'login', 'sysvinit' packages are the new ones, but 'last' writes
complete garbage, and a slight view at wtmp shows something different than
I'm nobody (just an annoyed lurker) but please think it over:
1) If you do care what DC argues about then answer to his address, not to
the list. Help keeping pollution down and the better use of the available
electron pool.
2) If you don't want to hear about him again, then please do not answer
15 matches
Mail list logo
