Ok. You and a few others here helped me decide. Thanks very much.
--
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> People often seem to resent what looks like a personal political idea
> getting in the way of the system. In this case it is suggested that
> Debian is being petty and fighting over trivial political stuff.
I am NOT trying to debate the decision to regard G
Max Hyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Watch out for loaded words. The decision was indeed
> ``political'' in that it was put up to a vote, but
> `politics' has negative connotations that I don't think
> apply here. Each person voting, whether pro or con, was
> voting out of principle, not beca
"Karl E. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "An alternative"? Re-writing the Emacs manual (IIRC this was the
> sticking point early on in this thread) is not an easy task. At the
> very least I would expect this to take some time. In the mean time, the
> maintainer(s) still had to follow
"Michael Marsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/30/07, Max Hyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You're not allowed to change or discard that lump. Isn't it at least
>> *understandable* that many believe this document is unfree?
>
> Given one particular invariant section that always appears in FS
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:56:03AM +, Tyler Smith wrote:
>> On 2007-05-31, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > About a year ago, there was a GR (general resolution) that Debian had
>> > and it said 'GFDL without invariant sections' are DFSG-
My name is Nic Ferrier. I am really ANGRY at Debian.
After 10 years of being a dedicated Debian user I have reached the
point at which I am so angry with what is being done that I want to
stop using it. I will start to look for viable alternatives to Debian.
A few weeks ago, as Emacs was nearing
7 matches
Mail list logo
