23 at 18:17 -0500, Mike Ward wrote:> I was looking at the gdesklets package, and it looked interesting> enough for me to apt-get it to try it and see how it was. Problem is> when I do a "gdesklets start", it times out while trying to connect to
> the daemon.>> I found an old
I was looking at the gdesklets package, and it looked interesting enough for me to apt-get it to try it and see how it was. Problem is when I do a "gdesklets start", it times out while trying to connect to the daemon.
I found an old FAQ page on it (page didn't even exist anymore, only the google c
On 6/11/05, Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Tom wrote:
> > [Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
> > (Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > PS A newly-discovered ancient Chinese proverb: when Debain releases,
> > > w
On 6/10/05, Phil Dyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with that point exactly.
>
> PS: 2 points for anybody that can figure out which point, or even which
> poster I'm agreeing with.
>
> (I really did try to stay out of this...)
>
> phil
>
> Mark said:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> >>> On Thur
On 6/9/05, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 03:44:04PM -0400, Jin Juku wrote:
> > I guess I really am a newbie, because I have no idea what this
> > top-posting business is supposed to mean ... we're not supposed to
> > send new, clean messages to the list ...?
>
> Qu
Evolution gave me some problems a little while ago, so I started using
Mozilla Thunderbird. I had no problems at all when removing Evolution.
It'll complain that it has to remove the 'gnome' package as well, but
that's just a meta package. Nothing to worry about.
For the record, for me at least,
If there was ever a thing that taught me to not get relaxed and take
it for granted that apt-get would handle everything nicely for me,
this is it.
/me grumbles and goes back to his panel-less desktop.
Additionally, I've noticed my non-us.debian.org apt source is
returning 404's on updating. I h
imageshack.us also works for a quick post of a screenshot. Then just
link it in IRC.
On 5/7/05, Colin Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scarletdown wrote:
>
> >Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Friday May 6 2005 7:54 am, Kent West wrote:
> >>
> >>In a pinch, you can also upload an image to my
Hi,
Both ethereal and tcpdump are giving me this error, and I'm not
finding much on google about it.
sbdcid222:~# tcpdump
tcpdump: getifaddrs: Connection refused
I also get this error upon starting Ethereal.
Anyone know what the problem might be?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you post the output from the
> dist-upgrade?
>
> Joe
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacob S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 10:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Evolution 2 ?
>
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:43:41 -040
Acutally, I just did a "apt-get remove evolution", "apt-get clean",
and "apt-get install evolution" and it worked just fine. Woo!
Thanks for the help, though.
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:39:12 -0500, Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct
I just did a dist-upgrade and got it, but it's giving me a amusing
error in which is says it needs 10MB to install, and I have about
negative 1TB.
df reports me as having 47 GB open.
I'm just going to remove the package and re-install it, and then if
that doesn't work, I'll play with it a bit, bu
I'm far from an email guru, and in fact only know the basics of it
all, but I think more details would help those who do know.
Maybe even attach the email?
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:35:31 +0530, Vijaya S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all,
> for some reason i got a messgae generated as "Re:Request
Seriously man, screen is God's gift to the console.
Even if not for this problem, look into it if you haven't already.
It's increadibly useful to me, and I haven't even looked into it in
depth, really.
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:13:06 +0530, Vijaya S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> It wasnt a dem
2004 at 10:57:04AM -0400, Mike Ward wrote:
> > Well, it obviously varies, but I just ran "lsof | wc -l" and it returned:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsof | wc -l
> > 6335
> >
> > I'll try running that next time I run into problems as well.
> &g
Well, it obviously varies, but I just ran "lsof | wc -l" and it returned:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsof | wc -l
6335
I'll try running that next time I run into problems as well.
Kernel version is 2.2.20-idepci
> What kernel version are you using and what is the output of:
>
> lsof | wc -l
>
>
I've written down a few of the libraries that programs don't seem to
be able to load randomly, although I'd expect that the libraries
aren't significant in this case, they just happen to be trying to load
them at the same time that there's "too many open files". But, just in
case, these are the one
Firstly, I apologize for having no real details on this.
I'm running Debian Unstable, and seemingly randomly, I'll go to run a
program or save a file or what not, and I'll get an error to the
effect of "too many open files on system". In one case, I rebooted to
try and solve this, and within 5 min
Generally speaking, to close a port, you shut down whatever deamon is
listening on it. For example, if you had port 80 open, and want to
close it, shut down your web server (apache or whatever else).
Same with ssh - to close that port, shut down sshd.
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:56:17 -0400, Tong <[EM
Yeah, there's always cases like that, I suppose.
They don't work with IE6 under crossover office (it sounds like you
already tried)?
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:39:49 -0700, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Summerfield wrote:
> > As for the advisability of running Internet Exploder at all,
For anyone who happens to stumble across this or what-not, I ended up
messing with Crossover Office a bit, and eventually got it to install
IE6. So far it works quite well, other than a few (realitively minor)
glitches in displaying things like combo boxes and such.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
2004 10:49:48 -0400, Paul Galbraith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Mike Ward wrote:
>
> > Thanks for al the suggestions everyone, I'll play with it a bit.
> >
> > Also, for the record, I'm not trying this because I'm designing for IE
> > or
Thanks for al the suggestions everyone, I'll play with it a bit.
Also, for the record, I'm not trying this because I'm designing for IE
or because I want to browse in IE, but because I know that 95% of the
people that log into our site use IE, and it'd be stupid and neglegent
to not test at all in
't tried it, but there are instructions for getting IE6 working with
> WINE on this website. http://frankscorner.org
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 4:40 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTEC
I was just wondering, really. Has anyone had any luck installing
Internet Explorer 6 on Debian Unstable?
It seems like a sin or something indeed, but I'm doing some web dev
stuff, so it would make testing on IE6 much easier, plus it'd just be
rather amusing to run IE6 on linux. Well, I think so, a
Yeah, after looking about a bit I came to the same conclusion, that
it's best not to mess with it. It's up to date for a debian stable
machine, so eh.
Really, the only reason was that we've been using
Cache::SharedMemoryCache to track user logins and such, and that
module is just painfully slow. S
This is going to be a really newb-ish question, but eh.
I'm looking to upgrade perl on a debian webserver, running mod_perl and apache.
Is doing this really going to be as simple as "apt-get upgrade perl",
or will this at all also affect mod_perl, etc? I've googled around and
looked on perl.apach
I've only used it on windows 2000, but for what it's worth, I've had
no problems with it there.
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:30:24 +0300, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:10:04PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> > Has anyone tried this?
> > http://www.desktoplinux
28 matches
Mail list logo
