Re: Audacity sound problem

2004-12-24 Thread Micheal Mukherji
CTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 01:48:33 +0530, Micheal Mukherji > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can play sound with xmms, mplayer etc. > > > I use esd. > > > > > > Audacity reports"Could not Initialize sound, host error&qu

Audacity sound problem

2004-12-24 Thread Micheal Mukherji
I can play sound with xmms, mplayer etc. I use esd. Audacity reports"Could not Initialize sound, host error" I made sure that no audio appl was holding the sound device. Any help wud be appreciated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Audacity sound problem

2004-12-24 Thread Micheal Mukherji
I can play sound with xmms, mplayer etc. I use esd. Audacity reports"Could not Initialize sound, host error" I made sure that no audio appl was holding the sound device. Any help wud be appreciated. -Micheal. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: need time in nano seconds

2004-12-13 Thread Micheal Mukherji
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:43:28 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Remember, though, that a ns is 1 billionth of a second, and so a > 3GHz CPU will onll does 3 cycles in a ns. Unless you are coding > to the bare metal with a *minimal* OS, like DOS, you can't do > anything useful in 3 clo

need time in nano seconds

2004-12-13 Thread Micheal Mukherji
Hello, Kindly excuse me for posting this on debian thread...I dont know whether it is apt or not, but as I am using Debian, I am posting this.. Can somebody tell me how I can get time elapsed in nanoseconds (possibly a function)? I have looked at the date command, but it is getting overflown with

Re: name of the program to use mouse in command line ?

2004-10-28 Thread Micheal Mukherji
gpm? > can anyone help me ? :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

regd max file size

2004-10-28 Thread Micheal Mukherji
My apologies if you feel its not a thing related to debian. Is the 'maximum file size' a constraint of a particular file system implementation or the constraint of operating system? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: inclde filed not found

2004-10-25 Thread Micheal Mukherji
Thanks much. It is working now. With debian, I am getting to know minute details... On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 05:16:44 -0500, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 15:20 +0530, Micheal Mukherji wrote: > > > > Hi list, > > I am new to debian. > &

inclde filed not found

2004-10-24 Thread Micheal Mukherji
Hi list, I am new to debian. Actually, I wanted to install qmail and friends so I downloaded the source and sat down to compile it. But to my surprise, it says some include files are not found. I checked for glibc, 'apt' says, it is installed. Still I am not able to find a single common include fil

Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache

2004-10-22 Thread Micheal Mukherji
> > Buffers:138752 kB <<< > > Cached: 326116 kB <<< > > Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about. If this is exactly what you are talking about, the 'top' command, and the meminfo shows the same numbers. It is the swap data that is currently in RAM.

Re: SSH

2004-10-22 Thread Micheal Mukherji
> This file is automatically appended for each new host connected to, > and is subsequently checked everytime you try to connect to a remote > host. Yes. So to avoid typing yes, an entry should be in the known_hosts file. To avoid typing password, an entry shud be made in the authorized_keys file.

Re: SSH

2004-10-22 Thread Micheal Mukherji
> Use ssh-keygen to generate an RSA key pair. then copy the generated > public key to all of your workstations' ~/.ssh/authorized_keys. Shud it be to authorized_keys? I think to avoid typing yes, he should make entries in ~/.ssh/known_hosts file. neways, since it asks only once, you can as well

Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache

2004-10-22 Thread Micheal Mukherji
If I am not wrong, the standard OS terminology for it is "buffer cache". I think this is what Paul was trying to differentiate from the main "cache". Paul, please confirm. On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:13:17 -0500, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-

Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache

2004-10-22 Thread Micheal Mukherji
> No, because Linux doesn't see the CPU cache. I'd bet my last > kopek that Paul is talking about: Who said Linux sees CPU cache? He was asking the difference between the two.. or am I wrong? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Re: Memory usage: buffer and cache

2004-10-22 Thread Micheal Mukherji
Buffer is a logical cache maintained by the operating system in the main memory while cache is actually a physical hardware that the cpu uses to decrease the effective memory access time. Buffer cache is used to store the most recently accessed data from disk(or what so ever), so that they dont ha