How can one upgrade an installed dpkg with a .deb file, much the same way
one can run:
rpm -Uhv
using rpm? I was hoping for a
dpkg -u
command, but I don't see this or anything like it. I can't find anything
in apt-get's man page, either.
Any suggestions, tips?
-Matt
--
To UNS
How can one upgrade an installed dpkg with a .deb file, much the same way
one can run:
rpm -Uhv
using rpm? I was hoping for a
dpkg -u
command, but I don't see this or anything like it. I can't find anything
in apt-get's man page, either.
Any suggestions, tips?
-Matt
--
To UNSU
(This msg is getting cross-posted to the Boost and Debian users' lists. I
hope that's ok.)
Summary:
Our builds are experiencing link-time problems with Boost libraries only on
Debian systems. Details below.
Does anyone have any suggestions on the root causes and fixes for this? If
not, p
How can one install .deb package as non-root user? I see a 'dpkg --root'
parameter, but it doesn't seem to help (as per below).
Redhat's rpm can install with an non-root account; why not
dpkg/apt/wajig...or maybe one of these things can do this somehow and I
don't know about it?
I'm part of
(My bad for sending out html-formatted text to the list...here's the
unstyled text. -Matt)
(I realize this may be a faq, but this 'useradd -m' is hard to google...)
Summary:
Is there a more-portable way to add users to a system then useradd(8)?
Why does Debian's useradd(8) require a "-m" switc
(I realize this may be a faq, but this
'useradd -m' is hard to google...)
Summary:
Is there a more-portable way to add users to a system then
useradd(8)?
Why does Debian's useradd(8) require a "-m" switch when other
unix/linux systems that I have seen do not?
Details:
On non-Debian systems:
$ us
I would like to send email from a CentOS/RHEL/Debian/Fedora command
line client. However, I want to be able to send the mail via a remote
SMTP server, and thus said email cmdline app must also be a SMTP
client.
Does any such thing exist?
I man mail(1)/mailx(1) on a Debian3.1-testing system and
At 3/19/2006 11:08 AM, Michael Marsh wrote:
On 3/19/06, Matt England <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I attempted to apt-get a Subversion 1.3.0 Debian package a few days ago
> (via an 'experimental' package base) and failed due to dependencies on
> updated libapr and other
I attempted to apt-get a Subversion 1.3.0 Debian package a few days ago
(via an 'experimental' package base) and failed due to dependencies on
updated libapr and other stuff that was apparently not ready.
Has anybody been able to update Subversion 1.3.0 via Debian package
management? Or can a
Can a C++ program call exit(0) from a thread?
My swdev project is finding that exit(0)'s from threads appear to be
randomly causing a segmentation fault, while the same thing on Windows and
Redhat has no issues.
-Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
I am trying to build a DART server on a Debian sarge system, and I'm
getting Java build errors, regardless if I use the Java SDK (rev 1.4.2 or
JDK 5), jikes, or gcj. Any thoughts?
More information on DART:
http://public.kitware.com/Dart/HTML/Index.shtml
http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/Da
blish some Debian
binary-to-test-system rev-control policies before I got into first round
test on my group's software.
-Matt
At 12/29/2005 01:45 PM, Matt England wrote:
Sarge-built binaries running on Woody systems:
Is this feasible?
I'm not talking about package management...just t
At 12/30/2005 04:37 PM, Steve Block wrote:
Install the appropriate development packages for what you seem to be
missing. For example, the package libreadline5-dev (or libreadline4-dev,
as appropriate).
Yep, after installing the "-dev" packages, the postgresql (in my case rev
8.1.1) build-from
While building postgresql 8.1.0 from source on Debian Sarge, I'm finding
the postgresql ./configure script can not find libreadling, libz, and
associated include/header files.
I can make at least some of these problems go away if I do things like tell
./configure about CFLAGS=-L/lib and also s
In my cross-platform-programming quests, I'm looking for ways to determine
via my Makefiles which system/platform said build process is running on, so
I can automatically pull in the correct libraries, build to the correct
target directories, use the correct platform-specific code, etc.
Back i
Sarge-built binaries running on Woody systems:
Is this feasible?
I'm not talking about package management...just the raw, binary.
Are dynamic-library-management tricks needed? Does the Debian testing
authority (or whoever is given responsibility of anointing Debian releases
for distribution)
I'm a software developer, and I would like one set of software binaries
(applications, libraries) to be able to run across many Linux platforms,
including FedoraCore, Redhat Enterprise Linux, and Debian (much the same
way XAMPP -- http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html -- claims that its
on
17 matches
Mail list logo
