https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68/micro-desktop
i've been working on a strategy to make it possible for people to have
more control over the hardware that they own, and for it to cost less
money for them to do so, long-term. i've had to become an open
hardware developer in order to do that.
i b
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> which should help answer the question you asked: your work - fantastic
> as it is - was *impossible to find*. it doesn't even remotely come up
> on the radar of queries. *nobody knows what you've ach
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to apologise for my mail I sent about two hours ago. I have
> overreacted mainly because of the length of the email, CAPS INSIDE and
> also because it's a topic which is being discussed for more than a year
> and which ma
adam, i apologise for not being in a position to reply in-thread: as
mentioned previously i tried (via gmane) but the entire discussion is
completely missing, and i forgot to ask people in the original post to
cc me if they would like an ongoing threaded reply.
i also notice that you removed debia
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17 February 2015 at 18:20, claude juif wrote:
>> Really rude answer. Really bad.
>
> I find it really rude to send emails of about 300 lines of text in
> total. Extremely rude.
i did apologise in advance, and explained why i to
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:20 PM, claude juif wrote:
>
>
> 2015-02-17 17:55 GMT+01:00 Andrew Shadura :
>>
>> Hi Luke,
>>
>> On 17 February 2015 at 17:28, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>> wrote:
>> > <265 lines of text and counting snipped>
>
ok, so there's been quite a discussion, both on slashdot, where
amazingly the comments that filtered to the top were insightful and
respectful, and also here on debian-devel and debian-users. as i
normally use gmane to reply (and maintain and respect threads) but
this discussion is not *on* gmane,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Am 16.02.2015 um 02:54 schrieb Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton:
>>
>> http://lkcl.net/reports/removing_systemd_from_debian/
>
>
> It's funny that when Wheezy (not Jessie!) came out, nobody complained
> that
http://lkcl.net/reports/removing_systemd_from_debian/
i've documented the process by which it is possible to run some of the
debian desktop window managers (TDE, fvwm, twm etc.) without the need
for systemd or libsystemd0 or any components related to systemd
whatsoever.
the process is not without
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a way to replace my current home network infrastructure
> with a single device running Debian.
paul, hi,
if you're still on the mad scheme of doing everything in a single box,
to give yourself hell _and_ high water f
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:15 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a way to replace my current home network infrastructure
> with a single device running Debian. I currently have these devices:
>
> * Siemens SpeedStream 4200. This is an ADSL2+ modem running the
> supplied
right - _finally_ i've encountered a requirement to upgrade a 2nd
system that has lvm2 and (in this 2nd case 2.6.18-486) a linux kernel
image, and have encountered the *exact* same problem as is in bugs
636123 and 638896. this time, however, i was anticipating that
something might go wrong, so was
just a word of warning: on absolutely no account, not for any reason,
should you buy WD "Green" drives.
i've just spent a hair-raising 6 weeks discovering that these drives,
when pushed above a mere 40 Centigrade, become so unstable that they
can actually become completely unresponsive, shut down,
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> now, i've discussed this on the bugtracker and there clearly isn't -
> and really shouldn't be - a listed debian dependency between
> linux-image-2.6.39 kernel and a userspace library. however
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636123
there's a rather complex set of interdependencies between
linux-image-2.6.39, libdevmapper, initramfs-tools and LVM that has
resulted in a system which last had 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 installed (and
associated packages) failing to boot when the l
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> folks, hi,
>
> bug reported: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636123
>
> i was wondering if anyone else has a similar configuration (booting
> off of root LVM partitions) and had encountered
folks, hi,
bug reported: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636123
i was wondering if anyone else has a similar configuration (booting
off of root LVM partitions) and had encountered similar issues of root
filesystems being unrecognised.
l.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-use
zram... there actually exists something called "Z-Ram", it was bought
by one of the major companies: it's actually 3D (stacked) ram and thus
you get a significantly higher memory density. thus, the use of the
name "zram" caused some confusion, that you had access to this quite
rare type of RAM mem
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
>> ok, i bring in phil now, who i was talking to yesterday about this.
>> what he said was (and i may get this wrong: it only went in partly) -
>> something along the lines of "remember to build the drives with
>> individual mdadm bitmaps enab
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:26 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> [2011.06.26.1634 +0200]:
>> > Search manpage for "partitions".
>>
>> that's odd. i read around each part (man mdadm^M /partitions^M),
>> para
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 3:11 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> [2011.06.26.1241 +0200]:
>> * is there an option to mdadm to make it display UUIDs instead of or
>> as well as the disk name?
>
> mdadm -Es
oo! yaay! there is, ho
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Andrew McGlashan
wrote:
> Anyway the long and short of it is, I can use mdadm without regard to
> what devices are found, such as /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc and the like as I
> rely purely on the UUID functionality, which as you know, mdadm handles
> perfectly
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Andrew McGlashan
wrote:
> I hear what you are saying, but I had a related problem which was similar.
well... it's funny, because this is exactly what i need.
> Anyway the long and short of it is, I can use mdadm without regard to
> what devices are found, s
ep or concerned for our future food supply i'd find a lamb
head-butting fence posts incredibly funny.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:26 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> [2011.06.25.1938 +0200]:
>> mdadm i can confirm goes and hunts down the symlink
UUIDs internally?
tia,
[martin's reply]
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 8:26 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> [2011.06.25.1938 +0200]:
>> mdadm i can confirm goes and hunts down the symlinks and adds
>> /dev/sdd! i don
http://www.limefree.org/download/TWR-MPC5125-Recovering-File-System.rar
http://www.limefree.org/down.asp
not entirely sure whom should be notified but this needs to be
investigated. has anyone encountered any LimeOS products at actual
retail stores in Copyright-enforcing countries? whilst i know
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Oscar Morante wrote:
> Have you seen this project [1]? It looks like they have been already
> thinking about the git+bittorrent idea.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/gittorrent/
yes. it's effectively shelved. the name "gittorrent" was abandoned
and the name "mi
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> Just - Wow... thanks!
>
> Hopefully digesting of this tasty post would not cause too much of farting ;-)
:)
> seems might be worth adding (if I am not missing the point), then the
> concept of "derivatives" would then converge finally
i'm contacting this list because i believe that it will have a high
concentration of people who may be interested in having a
non-Intel-based 100% free software compatible laptop: if i am mistaken
in that assumption, i apologise: feel free to hit delete and ignore
this message.
in order to avoid s
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:59:21AM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:01, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It's actually disabled again (compiled in but disabled) in SuSE because
> > > the performance hit was muc
This is a status / progress report for Debian / SE/Linux integration.
I look forward to the day when it need no longer be maintained,
which will be when all of the outstanding issues have been addressed.
The constant work-in-progress version of this report will always be
available from:
h
hi, i have installed a lot of debian systems and this one is the
strangest and most frustrating issue i've ever come across, and
i seriously need help or i will blow this machine away with a
reinstall.
yes, that's right - a debian system that i will be forced to treat
as lowlife scum like windows:
32 matches
Mail list logo
