SUBSCRIBE

-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/165 - Release Date: 11/9/2005 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OT] SATA vs. SCSI

Now that SATA has NCQ and TCQ native (if you are using the proper controller), 5 year warranties, 10K rpm, and sub 10ms access times, the What's use from NCQ, if accordingly to http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html#tcq "Queueing support is not currently available in any release ker

Re: [OT] SATA vs. SCSI

I am shooting for top notch reliability. SCSI. SATA's fast, but not as reliable, IMHO. SCSI is *expensive*. Unless you have huge databases that need the speed of 10K or 15K RPM drives, SATA is the way to go. The days of SCSI ruling are rapidly coming to an end. Now that SATA has NCQ and

Re-ordering the hard drives during install... impossible??

Hello everyone, I have been banging my head against the brick wall which is the Debian installer. I am trying to install to a system with 5 hard drives: 1) Boot drive on an Adaptec 29160 2) 2 x 120 GB on a vanilla Promise ATA 133 controller (Linux software RAID) 3) 2 x 250 GB on the motherboar