Sep 25 23:13:30 antec kernel: [12074.506735] sr0: CDROM not ready. Make sure
there is a disc in the drive.
Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112791] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting
with the "irqpoll" option)
Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112795] Pid: 8085, comm: Socket Thread
Tainte
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:49:32AM +0400, recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
> Judging from xchi_hcd, it's a USB 3.0 hub. Try unloading this module
> on suspend, and loading it at resume.
>
> Or, try this:
>
> http://www.pcl-developers.org/xhci-hcd-I-hate-you-USB-3-0-and-Primesense-Asus-Xtion-td5707949
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 08:58:55AM +0200, emmanuel segura wrote:
> lspci -vv
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family
DRAM Controller (rev 09)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P8P67 Deluxe Motherboard
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemW
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:51:35AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> Just before the error is the complaint
>
> irq event 55: bogus return value ff94
>
> What device have you got on IRQ 55? (Try "grep 55: /proc/interrupts" to
grep 55: /proc/interrupts
55: 1 0 0
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:10:26PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> If you are using the proprietary Nvidia driver, that's it.
I do I am using 304.88 from wheezy repository.. How could I fix it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On 17 September 2013 18:58, emmanuel segura wrote:
> Read this link http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=3582750
>
Read it. It must be, How to tell which driver caused the taint?
This happens in hibernation.
6143 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.484624] ACPI: Waking up from
system sleep state S4
6144 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536857] PM: noirq restore of
devices complete after 51.993 msecs
6145 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536892] irq event 55: bogus
my set of old RAM fixed the issue. Shame on you Gskill.
Thanks List!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CACAe89w1MHZpcxpO05P=q7K5YJn+fTW-hF8Oo4=19fd-etb
On 6 February 2013 13:13, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Jim Green
> wrote:
>> my debian squeeze amd64 has served me well for past 2/3 years. I
>> struggled a few days with recent frequent crashes and hope to get some
>> help from the list. I alr
On 6 December 2011 19:33, Arno Schuring wrote:
> Jim Green (student.northwest...@gmail.com on 2011-12-06 05:17 +):
>> On 6 December 2011 05:07, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > Do you have any examples of something in the Linux 3.x kernel that
>> > isn't in the 2.6.3
On 6 December 2011 05:07, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Do you have any examples of something in the Linux 3.x kernel that
> isn't in the 2.6.38 kernel that is likely to cause trouble?
Actually I don't :) I haven't got the chance to look through the long
changelogs..
my other concern using the 3.** kernel
On 5 December 2011 23:43, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> If you want to run the older series of kernel but with security
>> patches applied then perhaps the best source would be a distro kernel
>> such as the Debian Squeeze Linux kernel 2.6.39. It contains all of
>
> Oops, 2.6.39 isn't
Hello community:
I use debian squeeze running 2.6.38.8-4. usually I download kernel
source tree from kernel.org and strip stuff I don't need and compile
my own kernel. but there is a problem, I think the older kernel such
as 2.6.38 are not being patched on kernel.org. lets say there was a
bug fix
On 25 April 2011 13:19, Jim Green wrote:
> On 25 April 2011 09:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jim Green wrote:
>>> I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I
>>> am thinking of bonding them to one nic, b
On 20 April 2011 03:30, Alex Mestiashvili
wrote:
> On 04/20/2011 05:55 AM, Jim Green wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>> in squeeze most perl modules are not up-to-date. for example
>> libmoose-perl.
>>
>> In this case I include the sid repo and attempt to upgrade to s
On 25 April 2011 09:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jim Green wrote:
>> I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I
>> am thinking of bonding them to one nic, but I only have one cable so
>> will only use one port. Will
Hi:
I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I
am thinking of bonding them to one nic, but I only have one cable so
will only use one port. Will this do much help to the
throughput/speed? If I have two cables connecting to both ports I
think it will definitely help, but h
Hello debianers:
today i successfully compiled 2.38.4 kernel using make-kmkg and fixed
the hibernate can't resume issue for kernel 2.38-2, got a couple
questions here:
first is run time and the latter is compile time, but what is the
difference here, is one of the other's subset? do their paramete
Hello!
in squeeze most perl modules are not up-to-date. for example libmoose-perl.
In this case I include the sid repo and attempt to upgrade to sid
version of libmoose but a hell of dependency begins. I am afraid if
insist on upgrading this module, lots of perl core module/perl would be
upgraded
On 20 March 2011 04:09, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> On 20 March 2011 02:24, Jim Green wrote:
>> http://www.gagme.com/greg/linux/raid-lvm.php
>
> That looks like an LVM1 article.
>
> Here's a readable one about LVM2:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-lvm
I already have
Total PE 953799
this is bigger than 65k,
does anyone know the current maximum number PE in debian lenny?
Jim
On 19 March 2011 22:15, Gregory Seidman
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:02:24PM -0400, Jim Green wrote:
>> this is what I have from fdisk -l, I h
this is what I have from fdisk -l, I have lvm on /dev/md1, md1 is a
raid10 array with 4x2T drives.
Disk /dev/md1: 4000.5 GB, 4000525058048 bytes
2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 976690688 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (mi
> IIRC, the OP said he's currently "storing some huge historical data to
> mysql database" on a combination of his internal laptop drive and two
> 320GB external USB drives. Let's see, that's
>
> 320 + 320 + 250?? = 890 GB _IF_ they're full, which they probably
> aren't, and he's probably holding
> Just stay away from the WD Green drives, or any 512/4096 hybrid drives,
> for your sake. :)
Thanks! also lets say I am building a quad/hex core desktop box for
computing. I'd like listen to ur advice about cpu and motherboard, I am not
partial to intel but I do prefer a quiet and debian friendly
>
> Why 4*2TB drives? Unless this is a MythTV server that's total overkill,
> and more than you need to spend. And then you have the 512/4096 sector
> size mismatch issue if you go with WD's 2TB green drives which murders
> performance. I highly discourage use of the WD green drives.
2T drive i
rote:
> On 02/19/2011 12:23 AM, David Christensen wrote:
>>
>> On 02/18/2011 08:36 PM, Jim Green wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a laptop with 120G harddrive, 2x320G external harddrive, I
>>> don't have a desktop.
>>> Now I am doing something serious s
Hello!
I have a laptop with 120G harddrive, 2x320G external harddrive, I
don't have a desktop.
Now I am doing something serious storing some huge historical data to
mysql database and want to have some better storage solution(I hate
the two external harddrives I bought 4 years ago, need to power
On 12 February 2011 15:08, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:50:04 -0500 (EST), Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:32:56 -0500, Jim Green wrote:
>>>
>>> I am using a different lightweight windows manager icewm... I guess
>>> some m
On 12 February 2011 14:03, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:55:23 -0500, Jim Green wrote:
>
>> On 12 February 2011 13:50, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>>> I am using a different lightweight windows manager icewm... I guess
>>>> some modules changed na
On 12 February 2011 13:49, Tixy wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 12:32 -0500, Jim Green wrote:
>> Hello:
>> I upgraded from lenny to squeeze, overall it was ok, but I still
>> couldn't silence the system beep..
>
> I had a beep problem in Squeeze recently and finally
On 12 February 2011 13:50, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:32:56 -0500, Jim Green wrote:
>
>> On 12 February 2011 13:22, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> In GNOME, you can try by disabling it via gconf editor:
>>>
>>> /apps/metacity/general/audible_bel
On 12 February 2011 13:22, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 12:32:47 -0500, Jim Green wrote:
>
>> I upgraded from lenny to squeeze, overall it was ok, but I still
>> couldn't silence the system beep..
>
> (...)
>
> In GNOME, you can try by disabling it v
Hello:
I upgraded from lenny to squeeze, overall it was ok, but I still
couldn't silence the system beep..
I already have
blacklist pcspkr
in
/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf
this used to work in lenny, but stopped working in squeeze,
thanks for any help!
Jim.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
33 matches
Mail list logo
