RE: Securing it properly

-Original Message- From: Jacob S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 7 februari 2004 22:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Securing it properly On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 15:56:46 -0500 Brett Carrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 09:48:56PM +010

RE: Securing it properly

-Original Message- From: Brett Carrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 7 februari 2004 21:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Securing it properly On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 09:48:56PM +0100, Henrik Johansson wrote: > Why is the standard webserver Apache 1.3 > and not

Securing it properly

Hi all! I'm a former RH user moving to Debian! Better late than never! I have a gazillion questions but i'll settle for this at first. There is a lot of doc out there... Why is the standard webserver Apache 1.3 and not 2.0? I thought it was stable. / Henrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

exim doesn't accept connections [was: ipchains/smtp/bastille problem]

other services on my machine (ssh) from outside my home network. My exim.conf hasn't been changed since I set this up initially and I could still recieve mail about a week after that. Theories anyone? br, Henrik Johansson -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

ipchains/smtp/bastille problem

m feature that can make it refuse incoming connections based om where they are coming from (ip or interface) that is not controlled by exim.conf? What am I doing wrong when I try to test the ipchains setup (with -C)? I must be doing something wrong since it says "denied" for stuf