things, I assume that I need to
> > amend the file and command locations to reflect the debian file structure.
> >
> > I'd appreciate some guidance.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Clive
>
>
no need of such a script! simply look at the document
with which software does the error
happen?
I had the same problem before I now use the alsa* packages from unstable
in which the problem (for me) has been fixed. Try a modprobe snd-seq as
root and start the soft to see if the error remains. If no and that you
don't want to use some pa
build my packages:
make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --append-to-version=.tuxbox
--revision=2.6.12.4 --initrd kernel_image kernel_source kernel_headers
kernel_doc
What can be wrong in my way of building my kernel-packages?
Best regards,
--
Brice Méalier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux user nb. 372699
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:56:06PM -0500, John Hasler wrote :
> Brice Méalier writes:
> > Personally I am fine with it and I trust his decisions. At least it works
> > like that and does it well.
>
> When did you last upgrade it? Do you run Unstable? When I try to install
ing the sources packages and
modifying the building scripts. I tried to do so but the packaging of
mplayer done by Marrillat is extremaly complex as it check what's
installed on your computer to determines how to build the packages...
Personally I am fine with it and I trust his decisions. At
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:46:57PM -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote :
> On 8/3/05, Brice Méalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I upgraded today from sarge to testing and all went well!
> >
> > But I found afterwards my graphics a bit slow and then I d
I run my own kernel (2.6.12.3 compiled
the debian way under sarge).
Could the fact that this kernel has been build under sarge responsible
for the impossibility of building the nvidia driver? or what can be the
matter and how can I solve that issue??
Best regards,
--
Brice Méalier
[EMAIL
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:32:02PM -0400, Darryl Clarke wrote :
> On 7/30/05, Brice Méalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> >
> > I use in my config mutt+exim4+procmail+fetchmail
> >
> > Procmail is adjusted to delivers the mail
onf file, only an
> exim4.conf.template etc
>
> How do I end up with an exim4.conffile, as I need to edit it.
>
>
take the file /var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated and copy it as
/etc/exim4/exim4.conf
HTH
--
Brice Méalier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux user nb. 372699
Debian
for my drive before adjusting the
settings of laptop-mode.
--
Brice Méalier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux user nb. 372699
Debian Sarge
-
"Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ification.
It's strange because bash is able to do it for the maildir format and I
adjust in my bashrc (that I source in bash_profile) "export
MAILPATH=my_box".
Can someone help???
Best regards,
--
Brice Méalier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux user nb. 372699
Debian Sarge
-
&quo
time as an alsa sequencer
client?
Any idea on how to solve this matter will be welcome!
Best regards,
--
Brice Méalier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux user nb. 372699
Debian Sarge
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:36:29PM -0400, Stephen R Laniel wrote :
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:15:33PM +0200, Brice Méalier wrote:
> > > I'd say that we should just keep new users away from the
> > > command line. I do all my work there, but it ceased to be
> >
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:17:18PM -0400, Stephen R Laniel wrote :
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 05:02:13PM +0200, Brice Méalier wrote:
> > There something that you can try to do instead of double-clicking on
> > item (this way you'll also experience the user-friendliness o
e to reinstall the package of the win32codecs or to
reconfigure it (take it from the marillat archive). This one install
some links to the codec in your .gnome* directory (I don't remember this
one).
--
Brice Méalier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux user nb. 372699
Debian Sarge
n C:\Program Files, don't you? I just want to make
> sure we're talking about the same thing. /usr/bin is
> basically the equivalent of C:\Program Files.
>
Well ok! but don't look to much at this! after some reading on the unix
filesystems you will understand that you c
16 matches
Mail list logo