Hi,
I have 4 EC keys (one is nistp256 [daily driver] and the others are nistp384).
I attempted to locally sign Greg's key
(647F28654894E3BD457199BE38DBBDC86092693E) using one of my nistp384 public
key, and using --local-user to specify the key. After entering the
passphrase, instead of the key be
On 28/06/21 20.14, Dan Ritter wrote:
The second problem is that ssl_ca should point to the CA bundle
for your desired SSL cert -- in this case, your own CA.
It is probably indicative of something that the only mention of
ssl_ca_path in Dovecot's documentation is in a comment in the config.
Is
Hi,
I have difficulties setting up Dovecot to connect to remote MariaDB
instance over TLS.
So I have two Debian 11 LXD containers spun up, one as mail server with
Postfix and Dovecot, and one as database instance with MariaDB. The LXD
host is Ubuntu 20.04.
I defined `passdb` in /etc/doveco
Debian's decisions on apache layout were made years earlier.
Extra configuration for apache2 should be put in conf.d
Hmmm, seems contradictory here.
You say extra apache2 configuration should be placed on `conf.d`,
but Debian layout use `sites-{available,enabled}` and
`conf-{available,enable
Hello,
When I install apache2 package, configuration files are stored in
`/etc/apache2/sites-{available,enabled}` and
`/etc/apache2/conf-{available,enabled}`.
When I compile and install apache2 from upstream source tarball,
supplemental configuration are stored in `$PREFIX/conf/extra` (depen
Hello,
I'd like to host my website on a local hosting provider. However, the provider
have datacenter in Spain, which is far
from my targeted audiences in Indonesia. Since the datacenter is far from the
audiences, I expected that my website
speed will be somewhat slower than if I choose hosting
Aniket Mathur:
Aniket Mathur this side, an active contributor of Sugarlabs as well as
a GSoC 19 participant. This mail is a small query regarding the
packaging of "sugar3" module.
We currently have v0.112 packaged. In the latest version (0.114)
Sugarlabs have made the toolkit compatible with bo
Paul Sutton:
Hi
Just found the 'kiddie' encyclopedia website as a link on a school
website. There is an entry for Debian which as you can see some of
which has not been updated since version 6.0
https://kids.kiddle.co/Debian
I don't mind offering to help them update the page so my first quest
So in summary:
- If NetworkManager is used, mark any connections other than Wi-Fi as
metered (as suggested by Ryan Nowakowski)
- Write helper script for apt that check for total download size, and if
it exceeds 100 MB, prompt whether download via Wi-Fi or continue using
current (non-Wi-Fi) c
On 24/06/19 06.27, Aidan Gauland wrote:
I can't really offer an opinion on whether it is dangerous without a
more detailed hypothetical scenario, but I would say that is
overbroad, and this rule should be narrowed down to only allow running
certain commands via sudo as required for this group
Hello Debian Users,
In Android (Google Play), when a user is about to download application which
its size is over 100 MB, a message is
displayed whether the application is about to be downloaded only via Wi-Fi or
continue using mobile data.
How can I configure the similar feature on apt, that
What a BS! This comes from Windoz for sure.
I don't know. Since 2013 most programs (GUI applications) there (TV stations
systems) display watermark which stated that
those are for teens (optionally with parental guidance). So children have to
wait until 13 in order to fully make use of
those s
Carl Fink wrote:
You seem to be assuming that Mr. Banjaya is in the USA. While that is
not impossible, given the Javanese name and non-USA usage of English,
I suspect that it is not correct.
In Indonesia, the case resemble hypothetical case in this thread, where
sysadmins in TV station does
Carl (ca...@panix.com) said:
OK, which meaning of "program" are you using here? In American (and
UK) English, it can mean either "set of instructions that run on a
computer" or "television entertainment item." You seem to be using it
both ways in this message or confusing the two.
In this c
I think we (or at least I) must be missing some context here. For
starters, this must be some specific group of teenagers. And I'm sure
they're not given permission to take over running the whole TV station.
Is this some specific educational environment? Or is it a TV station
specifically intende
That is almost as bad as having no security restrictions at all. The
correct thing to do would be to set permissions on the programs to
allow them to be run by group remaja.
What I thought that the correct way is to configure sudoers so that
remaja group can access programs that they absolutely r
Hello all Debian Users,
Consider the hypothetical scenario below.
I often encountered cases on systems in television stations when they
configured sudoers like this snippet below:
%remaja ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL
The rationale for above is most programs on such systems can only be
accessed by user
17 matches
Mail list logo
