Thanks for the reply.
I checked the permissions - they were read.
Just for the heck of it I tried Restore and it worked! All is now well.
On 3/16/2025 11:19 AM, Marco Moock wrote:
On 16.03.2025 16:00 Uhr Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
Deja Dup refuses to find my backups. I don't have the faintest
Reported at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100655
for anyone interested.
> On 16 Mar 2025, at 16:06, Joe wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 14:38:45 +
> "Gareth Evans" wrote
>>
>> So working again, but a messy/broken upgrade process for me.
>>
>> Is this worth reporting?
>
> Yes, I would think so, most Debian servers will be running mariadb on
> bookworm, eithe
(re-send email due to some spam rule)
Hellow Eric and there,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Response below/inline for email Leandro Noferini wrote:
>> (original email sent 4 Mar 2025 at 12:20)
>>
>> Ciao a tutt*,
>>
>> is possible to set this mailling list in "nomail" mode to remain
>> subscribed but
On 2025-03-16, Byunghee HWANG wrote:
>>
>> Depending on what tools you use to read your emails, if they support
>> NNTP (newsgroups), you can access this "mailing list" via the
>> gmane.linux.debian.user newsgroup. This is how I access the list.
>
> Also i like gmane.linux.debian.user newsgroup.
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 14:38:45 +
"Gareth Evans" wrote:
> On Sun 16/03/2025 at 11:01, Joe wrote:
>
> > What's the background here? Did you have a working mariadb
> > installation before, and is it still working?
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> It was working before and after the failed upgrade, as neithe
On 16.03.2025 16:00 Uhr Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> Deja Dup refuses to find my backups. I don't have the faintest idea
> as to what is wrong or how to fix it. There were no problems with
> restoring files on the computer that I retired.
>
> I would really appreciate some guidance as to solutions.
I have just installed Bookworm on my new computer and have encountered a
perplexing problem.
Deja Dup refuses to find my backups. I don't have the faintest idea as
to what is wrong or how to fix it. There were no problems with restoring
files on the computer that I retired.
I would really a
On Sun 16/03/2025 at 11:01, Joe wrote:
> What's the background here? Did you have a working mariadb installation
> before, and is it still working?
Hi Joe,
It was working before and after the failed upgrade, as neither it nor anything
else had been upgraded.
I copied mariadb.cnf from the ext
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Where does this come from? reprepro is version 5.4.6+really5.3.2-1. Did
somebody tried to turn back the clock? How can I recover from this?
PS: Seems this came up with the reprepro "upgrade" 2 days ago:
reprepro:amd64 (5.4.6-3, 5.4.6+really5.3.2-1)
Regards
Harri
On 2025-03-16, wrote:
>
>> > Not yet, I'm in the UK and the boat is in France, I'll be back there
>> > in a couple weeks. :-)
>> That's the dream, man, to leisurely navigate those French canals in the
>> spring or summer. Good sailing to you.
> I used to cycle them, also a dream. And waved to t
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 07:50:27PM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
>> git fails to preserve ownership, permissions or timestamps. While this may
> [...]
>
> Half-wrong. Git doesn't preserve ownerships, but it does preserve
> permissions (the POSIX things).
Still quarter(?)-wro
Hi folks,
Trying to add or remove a source package in my local sid repository
reprepro returns
% reprepro removesrc sid iproute2
BDB1015 references: duplicate sort specified but not supported in database
db_open(/var/www/debian/db/references.db:references)[22]: Invalid argument
There have been e
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 01:33:08PM -, Greg wrote:
> On 2025-03-15, Chris Green wrote:
[...]
> > Not yet, I'm in the UK and the boat is in France, I'll be back there
> > in a couple weeks. :-)
>
> That's the dream, man, to leisurely navigate those French canals in the
> spring or summer. Goo
On 2025-03-15, Chris Green wrote:
> Greg wrote:
>> On 2025-03-15, Chris Green wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks for all the help everyone, it made me fairly sure most cameras
>> > would be likely to work OK. I chose the above one (apart from Amazon
>> > next day delivery) because it is reasonably high de
Le 3/13/25 à 17:36, Michael Stone a écrit :
I guess I don't understand how you expect smartctl to query a dead disk. It's
dead, that means it's not going to respond.
I secretly wished there was some kind of blackbox in some specialized chip or
memory
that specialized software can use for fore
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:56:47 +
"Gareth Evans" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> $ cat /etc/debian_version
> 12.10
>
> An automated apt update/upgrade failed last night. On trying again,
> I get:
>
> $ sudo apt update; sudo apt upgrade
>
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> 48 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0
Le 3/13/25 à 14:33, Erwan David a écrit :
You can get the layout with lsblk, IIRC
I'm not an expert on the subject,
but from the few man pages and online help I've gathered,
I have come to understand that the system (and lsblk) only see logical disks.
Physical disks are hidden behind the RAID
Hello,
$ cat /etc/debian_version
12.10
An automated apt update/upgrade failed last night. On trying again, I get:
$ sudo apt update; sudo apt upgrade
Preconfiguring packages ...
48 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/13
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 07:51:24AM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2025, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > Git *does* preserve permissions [1]. For the ownerships (and more accurate
> > mtime, atime and ctime) cf. etckeeper.
> >
> Git only tracks the execute bit. And because it always writ
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Git *does* preserve permissions [1]. For the ownerships (and more accurate
mtime, atime and ctime) cf. etckeeper.
Git only tracks the execute bit. And because it always writes a new file
rather than truncate then write by most editors, the permissio
21 matches
Mail list logo
