Brieuc Desoutter composed on 2025-03-04 10:02 (UTC+0300):
...
/etc/X11/xorg.conf is an optional file that most users have had no need for for
most of the past two decades. The main exception in actual practice is that
installation of proprietary NVidia drivers historically has created one.
xorg.co
Hi,
I have installed Debian 12.9 from the live image on my System76 Oryx Pro
(Intel Xe Graphic + nvidia 4060) yesterday.
I have NOT installed the nvidia-driver yet (previous attempt failed and I
re-installed fresh), only i915 and nouveau are installed.
Now my second monitor connected via HDMI por
On 3/3/25 02:03, Dan Purgert wrote:
On Mar 02, 2025, Eben King wrote:
[...]
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 082 064 006 Pre-fail
Always - 146369262
146 million read-errors.
7
On Mon 03 Mar 2025 at 22:24:57 (+0100), Hans wrote:
> So, I rechecked.
>
> After purging everything and building again, I checked the chroot. And what
> did I find?
>
> A lot of entries with "trixie" in */chroot/var/lib/dpkg/info which are mostly
> "*.postinst" files.
>
> Where are they comin
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 at 16:57, Will Mengarini wrote:
> This kind of information
>
> popos/pts/4 bash ~ 08:54 0$diff -b debfaq--2025-0{2,3}-01
> 88c88,90
> < world. Off-topic arguments also have a habit of derailing useful
> discussion.
> ---
> > world.
> >
> >
Greg wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to use the following:
> https://ftp.icm.edu.pl/packages/LSI/sw/lsiutil-1.72.x86-64.el7
> The source:
> https://ftp.icm.edu.pl/packages/LSI/sw/lsiutil-1.72.tar.gz
>
> Unfortunately I get:
>
> # ./lsiutil-1.72.x86-64.el7
> LSI Logic MPT Configuration Utility
Eben King wrote:
>
>
> On 3/3/25 05:03, Dan Purgert wrote:
> > Well, at least those read errors were all corrected ;)
> >
> > None of the first three bits are absolute proof that the drive is going,
> > but they're certainly cause for suspicion.
>
> Is there a way of seeing how many spare bloc
Hi there,
I'm trying to use the following:
https://ftp.icm.edu.pl/packages/LSI/sw/lsiutil-1.72.x86-64.el7
The source:
https://ftp.icm.edu.pl/packages/LSI/sw/lsiutil-1.72.tar.gz
Unfortunately I get:
# ./lsiutil-1.72.x86-64.el7
LSI Logic MPT Configuration Utility, Version 1.72, Sep 09, 2014
0 MPT
So, I rechecked.
After purging everything and building again, I checked the chroot. And what
did I find?
A lot of entries with "trixie" in */chroot/var/lib/dpkg/info which are mostly
"*.postinst" files.
Where are they coming from? These are all from installed packages, but all
packages shoul
Am Montag, 3. März 2025, 19:05:19 CET schrieben Sie:
Hi Matthias,
> Am Mo., 3. März 2025 um 13:32 Uhr schrieb Hans :
>
> At first my advice: please try debian-l...@lists.debian.org
>
done!
> My way to build debian live is not with git but according to
>
> https://live-team.pages.debian.net/li
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 09:40:35 -0500
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 7:32 AM Hans wrote:
> >
> > I believe, that one of the following packages needs the missing
> > package. Please see the last output (sorry, it is bit longer):
>
> Something looks a bit off:
>
> $ apt-cache r
On 03/03/2025 11:49, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Counter Proposal: Ask whomever is providing you the packge, to offer it
as a Debian Repository. That way, your custom application is just a
"extrepo enable " away.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
On 3/3/25 05:03, Dan Purgert wrote:
Well, at least those read errors were all corrected ;)
None of the first three bits are absolute proof that the drive is going,
but they're certainly cause for suspicion.
Is there a way of seeing how many spare blocks are left?
The "space at the end of a
Am Mo., 3. März 2025 um 13:32 Uhr schrieb Hans :
At first my advice: please try debian-l...@lists.debian.org
My way to build debian live is not with git but according to
https://live-team.pages.debian.net/live-manual/html/live-manual/index.en.html
Usually I start with "sudo lb clean" and then
This kind of information
popos/pts/4 bash ~ 08:54 0$diff -b debfaq--2025-0{2,3}-01
88c88,90
< world. Off-topic arguments also have a habit of derailing useful discussion.
---
> world.
>
> Off-topic arguments also have a habit of derailing useful discussion.
15
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 15:44:11 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
> > You can install any random .deb package from any source using dpkg [...]
>
> dpkg won't install missing dependencies.
> gdebi will.
So will apt-get and apt. It's just undocumented.
apt install
On 3/3/25 10:08, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 09:49:30AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Now I wait for trixie in thhe hope that I can convince it to NOT
install brltty and orca just because the ONLY usb socket is occupied
by a logitek wireless mouse button. They are not removable
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 09:49:30AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Now I wait for trixie in thhe hope that I can convince it to NOT
> install brltty and orca just because the ONLY usb socket is occupied
> by a logitek wireless mouse button. They are not removable/purgeable
> w/o screwing up the s
Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
You can also compile software source code[...]> This is not a trivial task.
I find configure, make, sudo make install often very simple.
So I'd say it depends on the software.
Sometimes you're missing header files,
in which case configure kindly shows you exac
On 3/3/25 01:06, Henrik Ahlgren wrote:
John Hasler writes:
There isn't any executable: that isn't how flatpak works. There's no
need for you to deal directly with anything under /var/lib/flatpak. To
run prusa-slicer type "flatpak run com.prusa3d.PrusaSlicer". I suggest
making a script named p
On 3/3/25 15:42, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
You can also compile software source code[...]> This is not a trivial
task.
I find configure, make, sudo make install often very simple.
So I'd say it depends on the software.
Sometimes you're missing header files,
in
Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
You can install any random .deb package from any source using dpkg [...]
dpkg won't install missing dependencies.
gdebi will.
Best,
--
yassine -- sysadm
http://about.me/ychaouche
Looking for side gigs.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 8:22 AM Alex Mestiashvili
wrote:
>
> On 3/3/25 12:49, Steven Speek wrote:
> > I would like this feature in apt-get.
>
> This is a disaster feature from my point of view. Debian packages are
> installed with root privileges, however, many systems are configured to
> allow use
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 7:32 AM Hans wrote:
>
> I believe, that one of the following packages needs the missing package.
> Please see the last output (sorry, it is bit longer):
Something looks a bit off:
$ apt-cache rdepends grub-efi-amd64-unsigned
E: No packages found
> __
On 3/3/25 7:10 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Since this is just a mailing list of Debian users, no one here is
empowered to do what you ask.
The proper procedure would be to report it as a wishlis
On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Exactly *WHAT* feature??
You supply *NO* context.
Also this list is primarily user-to-user support.
On 3/3/25 6:56 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:14:40 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Exactly *WHAT* feature??
You supply *NO* context.
This is why I advise people NOT to put the de
On 3/3/25 12:49, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
This is a disaster feature from my point of view. Debian packages are
installed with root privileges, however, many systems are configured to
allow users to use sudo to install packages from configured and trusted
rep
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Steven Speek wrote:
> I would like this feature in apt-get.
Since this is just a mailing list of Debian users, no one here is
empowered to do what you ask.
The proper procedure would be to report it as a wishlist bug on apt-get
in the Debian bug trac
Le 3/3/25 à 13:14, Richard Owlett a écrit :
On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Exactly *WHAT* feature??
You supply *NO* context.
Also this list is primarily user-to-user support.
Happy now?
Look how angry you made Steven Speek now.
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:14:40 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
> > I would like this feature in apt-get.
> >
>
> Exactly *WHAT* feature??
> You supply *NO* context.
This is why I advise people NOT to put the details of their request only
in
Steven Speek wrote:
> I would like this feature in apt-get.
Until then, you can use wget to retrieve the URL and apt install
to install from the filename.
In general, this is rather dangerous, and should probably be
avoided. There may be better solutions, depending on the context
of where these
I would like this feature in apt-get.
So, tried agian without the */packages-lists/mylist.list.chroot and without
any added packages at */packages.chroot = same issue again.
This excludes the cause by any changes from me or by any added packages.
It is proven, the issue is in the live-build environment itself.
Hans
Good idea, Matthias, so I rechecked. There are only two packages in
packages.chroot in the last build I sent the output from.
These were "kali-undercover_2023" and "rustdesk-1.3.7". In both I checked the
"control" file, but none of them pointed to or named "grub-efi-amd64-*".
But to clear thi
On Mar 02, 2025, Eben King wrote:
> [...]
> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
> WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
> 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 082 064 006 Pre-fail
> Always - 146369262
146 million read-errors.
> 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000
On 2025-03-03 David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 02 Mar 2025 at 20:32:24 (+0100), Hans wrote:
>
> > The only thing I got, was the message from "lb build", that a ncessary
> > package
> > could not be downloaded. And the necessary package was named
> > "grub-efi-amd64-
> > unsigned".
>
> That suggests t
Hello again,
I believe, that one of the following packages needs the missing package. Please
see the last
output (sorry, it is bit longer):
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
The following additional packages will be installed:
dmsetu
Chris Green writes:
> With modern systems booting so fast I wonder why anyone bothers with
> hibernate or sleep.
I guess my modern systems are different from yours, boot times are long.
Also, in my life software has state and that is kept by sleep and
hibernate. So when the computer wakes up, a
> The nvidia-driver package from non-free apparently doesn't work with a
> Quadro K2200. NVidia recommends the 570 driver.
>
> When I first installed the system, the left-hand pane of Evolution
> would spontaneously scroll, even if a different window had keyboard and
> mouse focus, and the mouse
gene heskett writes:
> An ls -lR of /var/lin/flatpack | wc -l shows:
>
> gene@coyote:~$ ls -R /var/lib/flatpak|wc -l
> 44889
> Nearly 45000 files for one app
That's primarily due to the runtime (org.gnome.Platform), which indeed
adds considerable overhead for a single application, though it
41 matches
Mail list logo
