On 20/2/24 18:11, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 19/2/24 14:20, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 19/2/24 10:26, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 18/2/24 14:49, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 18/2/24 07:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
Yes the / partitions are btrfs
So the a
Le 20/02/2024 à 01:58, Andy Smith a écrit :
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 08:35:18PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
Sorry il was packagekit, I made a mistake while writing.
If it's packagekit then isn't it going to be some part of your
desktop environment? Which desktop environment are you using?
GN
Le 20/02/2024 à 03:20, Max Nikulin a écrit :
On 20/02/2024 02:35, Erwan David wrote:
Le 19/02/2024 à 18:00, Max Nikulin a écrit :
systemctl disable --now apt-daily.timer apt-daily-upgrade.timer
Perhaps it is possible to write a script that will respect
connection.metered property set by N
Keith Bainbridge composed on 2024-02-20 17:45 (UTC+1100):
> I just removed 3 snapshots from my daily driver with no change in used
> space reported by df
df doesn't know how to calculate freespace on btrfs. You need to be typing
btrfs filesystem df
if you have not aliased df to btrfs f
just checking
--
CK
On 19/2/24 14:20, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 19/2/24 10:26, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 18/2/24 14:49, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
On 18/2/24 07:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
Yes the / partitions are btrfs
So the apparently missing space is perhaps taken up
On 19/2/24 13:00, Max Nikulin wrote:
On 19/02/2024 06:26, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
So later yesterday afternoon I created a new snapshot with no obvious
change is free space.
Effect of snapshots is delayed. When you remove a file that does not
belong to any snapshot, some disk space is rec
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 03:56:49AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:21:24PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Does anyone know when these things changed, and why on earth nobody
> > knew about it?! Did I miss a section in the release notes or something?
>
> Why are you shocked
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:21:24PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Does anyone know when these things changed, and why on earth nobody
> knew about it?! Did I miss a section in the release notes or something?
Why are you shocked by this? Most of it is disabled by default (no
update / upgrade /
On 2/19/24 22:15, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:06:23PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Andy, look at that CET after my name in the sig, that stands for Certified
Electronics Tachnician.
There isn't a polite way to say this really but unfortunately I am
unable to take you seriou
On 20/2/24 08:48, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:12:44PM -0300, Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ wrote:
The notorious red SATA cables - I threw them out long ago. The red
pigment eats up the fine copper threads, changing the impedance of the
cable and eventually making false con
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:20:11AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> > > systemctl disable --now apt-daily.timer apt-daily-upgrade.timer
> To avoid confusion, these timers are from the apt package, not from
> unattended-upgrades. So they are active on most Debian hosts.
Holy crap... when did this h
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:06:23PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Andy, look at that CET after my name in the sig, that stands for Certified
> Electronics Tachnician.
There isn't a polite way to say this really but unfortunately I am
unable to take you seriously as you've posted so many outrigh
On 2/19/24 20:29, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 08:16:49PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
I've never heard of this. I did a bit of searching around and all I
can find is assertions that cable colour doesn't matter for SATA. I
can't seem to find anything about red pigment damaging
On 2/19/24 19:49, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:12:44PM -0300, Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ wrote:
The notorious red SATA cables - I threw them out long ago. The red
pigment eats up the fine copper threads, changing the impedance of the
cable and eventually making false conta
On 20/02/2024 02:35, Erwan David wrote:
Le 19/02/2024 à 18:00, Max Nikulin a écrit :
systemctl disable --now apt-daily.timer apt-daily-upgrade.timer
Perhaps it is possible to write a script that will respect
connection.metered property set by NetworkManager.
I disable the timers, thanks
Andy Smith composed on 2024-02-20 01:29 (UTC):
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 08:16:49PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
>>> I've never heard of this. I did a bit of searching around and all I
>>> can find is assertions that cable colour doesn't matter for SATA. I
>>> can't seem to find anything about red p
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 08:16:49PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> > I've never heard of this. I did a bit of searching around and all I
> > can find is assertions that cable colour doesn't matter for SATA. I
> > can't seem to find anything about red pigment damaging the copper.
> > Have you go
Andy Smith composed on 2024-02-20 00:48 (UTC):
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:12:44PM -0300, Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ wrote:
>> The notorious red SATA cables - I threw them out long ago. The red
>> pigment eats up the fine copper threads, changing the impedance of the
>> cable and eventually ma
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 08:35:18PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> Sorry il was packagekit, I made a mistake while writing.
If it's packagekit then isn't it going to be some part of your
desktop environment? Which desktop environment are you using?
GNOME will download updates and prompt you to i
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 04:12:44PM -0300, Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ wrote:
> The notorious red SATA cables - I threw them out long ago. The red
> pigment eats up the fine copper threads, changing the impedance of the
> cable and eventually making false contact before failing completely.
I'
> On 18 Feb 2024 21:28 +0100, from borde...@tutanota.com (Borden):
> > what the default is when neither of those are set (which doesn't
> > work). Is this another "undocumented feature" of GRUB?
>
> Would you be willing to post your /boot/grub/grub.cfg for a setup where you
> get the blank screen
Le 19/02/2024 à 18:00, Max Nikulin a écrit :
On 19/02/2024 14:35, Erwan David wrote:
After each boot, the equivalent of apt update is automatically done
in background, through policykit (apt database is locked by
policykitd). So I think there is a timer triggroing this. I'd like to
disable t
Well, it appears like most things in life this one was self inflicted.
🤬
Yesterday I was working on another project and to verify something was
occurring the 'strace' utility was recommended. It dawned on me that
this could help me get a clue as to what was happening to the
gnome-keyring-daemon.
On Montag, 19. Februar 2024 14:20:52 -03 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:02:10AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> > I am running up to date Bookworm on my Debian platform:
> >
> > Processor AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor
> > Memory 8026MB (5267MB used)
> > Machine
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 12:30:30PM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for he reply. It's somewhat reassuring.
>
> According to my logs the box had its' last major last upgrade in 2014, so I
> shouldn't be too surprised.
>
> My backup is underweight and should be done sometime tomor
On 02/19/2024 12:20 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:02:10AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
I am running up to date Bookworm on my Debian platform:
Processor AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor
Memory 8026MB (5267MB used)
Machine TypeDesktop
Operating System
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:02:10AM -0500, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I am running up to date Bookworm on my Debian platform:
>
> Processor AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor
> Memory8026MB (5267MB used)
> Machine Type Desktop
> Operating System Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
>
[Also posted to commun...@debian.org / listmas...@lists.debian.org]
Subject: Banning of a user from posting to Debian lists
===
As noted in the monthly FAQ, among the events that can take place on Debian
lists as a result of breach of the Debian
On 19/02/2024 14:35, Erwan David wrote:
After each boot, the equivalent of apt update is automatically done in
background, through policykit (apt database is locked by policykitd). So
I think there is a timer triggroing this. I'd like to disable this when
my laptop is on expensive link (eg 4G
David, feel free to stop discussion if you find me annoying. My problem
in some sense is close to your one and I am trying to figure out if
missed some udisks feature and the result is some inconvenience.
On 19/02/2024 11:26, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 18 Feb 2024 at 12:41:29 (+0700), Max Niku
I am running up to date Bookworm on my Debian platform:
Processor AMD FX(tm)-8320 Eight-Core Processor
Memory 8026MB (5267MB used)
Machine TypeDesktop
Operating SystemDebian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
I have been plagued with orphaned inodes. Last night the problem cane to
a hea
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Looking at a set of installed binary packages built from the same source
> package, I would like to keep the version numbers consistent. There might
> be exceptions, but in general you won't like to mix unstable and experimental
> binary packages from the nvid
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> As promised:
> I said sometime in this thread that timeshift (and Back in Time) use hard
> links to create progressive copies of the system. The more I think about how
> hard links reportedly work, I reckon it can't be simply hard links.
>
> So I'm starting a new thread
Hi folks,
Looking at a set of installed binary packages built from the same source
package, I would like to keep the version numbers consistent. There might
be exceptions, but in general you won't like to mix unstable and experimental
binary packages from the nvidia-graphics-drivers, for example.
David Christensen wrote:
> On 2/18/24 19:20, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> > I am convinced that the missing space is used by btrfs snapshot
> > process.
>
>
> Perhaps. But, are you re-balancing your btrfs file systems regularly?
>
> https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/btrfs-progs/btrfs-balance
Am 19.02.2024 um 04:20 schrieb Keith Bainbridge:
> I am convinced that the missing space is used by btrfs snapshot process.
First off: I am not a btrfs user (and will never be, i might add).
I am using zfs since many years, and - although i read an awful lot of
documentation beforehand, and played
Erwan David writes:
> Hello,
>
> After each boot, the equivalent of apt update is automatically done in
> background, through policykit (apt database is locked by
> policykitd). So I think there is a timer triggroing this. I'd like to
> disable this when my laptop is on expensive link (eg 4G link
38 matches
Mail list logo
