On 2021-07-07 19:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
The error is indeed quite suspicious and I'd be weary of making any
permanent changes to the drive, unless it's 100% reproducible with a
known good connection (preferably pure SATA).
I got another USB/SATA adapter and badblocks reports no problems.
m
On 2021-07-10 at 21:30, Geoff wrote:
> The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> (Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes
>> a fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
>>
>>
>> I've recently built a new computer, installed Debian, configured it
>> to largely match my previous setup,
The Wanderer wrote:
(Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes a
fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
I've recently built a new computer, installed Debian, configured it to
largely match my previous setup, and migrated my data across.
Now, I'm trying to take advan
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 09:25:51PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, July 10, 2021 06:44:47 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > I was going to link you to the DebianBuster wiki page where I had put
> > the standard sources.list for buster, but it appears someone doesn't
> > want you to have t
On Saturday, July 10, 2021 06:44:47 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> I was going to link you to the DebianBuster wiki page where I had put
> the standard sources.list for buster, but it appears someone doesn't
> want you to have that information.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster?action=diff&rev2=
Hi,
> I was going to link you to the DebianBuster wiki page where I had put
> the standard sources.list for buster, but it appears someone doesn't
> want you to have that information.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster?action=diff&rev2=23&rev1=22
>
> You can thank the person who goes by th
On 2021-07-10 at 19:08, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-07-10 at 17:36, idiotei...@gmail.com wrote:
>> There you go, some packages are at the same version in Testing and
>> Unstable, so you will see them in both.
>
> (Just to confirm, are you the person who responded above under the
> name Brian
On 2021-07-10 at 17:36, idiotei...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le 10/07/2021 à 17:41, The Wanderer a écrit :
>
>> On 2021-07-10 at 07:43, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here (because of the
>>> freeze I pull some newer packages from experimental). Same gr
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 03:28:27PM -0700, kris wrote:
> Long version of error message in activities software.
> Unable to dowmload updates: Failed to update cache: E: the
> repository /cdrom://Debian GNU/ Linux 10.10.0-Buster_-Official amd64 DVD
> Binary-1 2021069-16:12 Buster Release does not have
Pierre Couderc composed on 2021-07-10 23:07 (UTC+0200):
> see : https://paste.debian.net/1203999/
> for( .local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log)
What does xrandr -q report booted this way?
https://wiki.archlinux.or
Long version of error message in activities software.
Unable to dowmload updates: Failed to update cache: E: the
repository /cdrom://Debian GNU/ Linux 10.10.0-Buster_-Official amd64 DVD
Binary-1 2021069-16:12 Buster Release does not have release file.
I should note i have seperate swap var partit
On Fri, 09 Jul 2021 22:14:23 +0300
Anssi Saari wrote:
> Joerg Kampmann writes:
>
> > Hello group I wanted to install ffmpeg under Debian 9 and got some
> > errormessages (in German):
>
> How about errormessages not in German? LANG=en_US.utf8 apt install
> ffmpeg?
>
> > ffmpeg : Hängt ab von
On Saturday, July 10, 2021 10:26:03 PM CEST, David Wright wrote:
I can't yet understand what you have done here.
all i did was an apt-get -V dist-upgrade
AIUI a2disconf
removes symlinks in /etc/apache2/conf-enabled/ that were previously
created there by a2enconf.
that's correct
OTOH, ap
Le 10/07/2021 à 17:41, The Wanderer a écrit :
On 2021-07-10 at 07:43, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Le 09/07/2021 à 23:44, The Wanderer a écrit :
(Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes
a fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
I've recently built a new compu
On 7/10/21 2:17 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
Pierre Couderc composed on 2021-07-09 09:05 (UTC+0200): > > >> Yes, EDID is wrong and does not show 3840x2160 warranted by
Samsung >> for UR59C 32". > > > > With dual displays, setup is more
complicated, instead of > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-monitor.conf
On Sat 10 Jul 2021 at 11:17:00 (+0200), Michael wrote:
>
> i disabled apache2-doc.conf in apache2 via a2disconf, but after the
> latest update it was enabled again w/o my consent. at least i got a
> message in the apt-get output.
I can't yet understand what you have done here. AIUI a2disconf
remo
On Sat 10 Jul 2021 at 13:48:12 -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Testing doesn't have any direct security support
>
> Is that 100% true? I was originally referring to
Almost, for most of the time and in normal circumstances.. It depen
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 01:48:12PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> Thank you for the detailed response, Andrei.
>
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Testing doesn't have any direct security support
>
> Is that 100% true? I was originally referring to
> http://securi
Thank you for the detailed response, Andrei.
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 21:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Testing doesn't have any direct security support
Is that 100% true? I was originally referring to
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/testing-security
when I was talking about
On Sat 10 Jul 2021 at 14:38:39 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> I'm a little surprised to see that you don't even mention the mix which
> I've been running for the last decade-plus: stable + testing, which
Most likely an oversight.
--
Brian.
On 2021-07-10 at 14:18, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 10 iul 21, 06:51:43, Brian Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
>>
>> Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites?
>
> It de
On Sb, 10 iul 21, 06:51:43, Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
>
> Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites?
It depends :)
In my opinion I'd say the order from less to more da
On 2021-07-10 at 11:14, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 10.07.2021 02:44, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have experience with using Vulkan with AMD graphics on
>> vaguely current Debian, using an even vaguely recent GPU? (Where
>> "vaguely current Debian" means Debian testing more rece
On 2021-07-10 at 07:43, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Le 09/07/2021 à 23:44, The Wanderer a écrit :
>
>> (Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes
>> a fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
>>
>>
>> I've recently built a new computer, installed Debian, configur
On 10.07.2021 02:44, The Wanderer wrote:
Does anyone have experience with using Vulkan with AMD graphics on
vaguely current Debian, using an even vaguely recent GPU? (Where
"vaguely current Debian" means Debian testing more recently than the
release of current stable, and a "vaguely recent GPU" m
On Samstag, 10. Juli 2021 09:13:57 -04 Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 14:57 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > This is not the point of the OP message, so let's not derail
>
> I apologize for accidentally derailing. I should have started a new
> thread. I'm still relatively
Le 10/07/2021 à 15:13, Brian Thompson a écrit :
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 14:57 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is not the point of the OP message, so let's not derail
I apologize for accidentally derailing. I should have started a new thread.
I'm still relatively new to the Debian c
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 14:57 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
> This is not the point of the OP message, so let's not derail
I apologize for accidentally derailing. I should have started a new thread.
I'm still relatively new to the Debian community.
--
Best regards,
Brian
signature.
Le 10/07/2021 à 13:51, Brian Thompson a écrit :
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites? I guess it wouldn't matter
that much for bits and pieces of experimental in
On Sat, 2021-07-10 at 13:43 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hi, Debian unstable with bits of experimental here
Is it (usually) wise to intermix different suites? I guess it wouldn't matter
that much for bits and pieces of experimental in unstable since you are already
in agreeance with
Le 09/07/2021 à 23:44, The Wanderer a écrit :
(Warning, this is fairly long, and the situation involved includes a
fair number of potentially-moving pieces.)
I've recently built a new computer, installed Debian, configured it to
largely match my previous setup, and migrated my data across.
Now
Attention: David
Hello,
I wish to add some info that might be of interest to you:
grub> ls (hd0,gpt1)/
efi/
Note: (hd0,gpt1) contains ESP (EFI System Partition)
grub> ls (hd0,gpt2)/
lost+found/ efi/ config-4.19.0.17-amd64 vmlinuz-4.19.0.17-amd64 grub/
System.map-4.19.0.17-amd64 initrd.img-4.1
Hi.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 05:49:44AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> >> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server
> >> Got some idea ?
> >
> > Your MTA signs these headers:
> >
> > Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Cc:References:To:From:Sub
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 05:45:08AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:20:24AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> > wrote:
> >> I receive the following regarding messages sent on the mailing list...
> >
> > A usual dmarc report, and you receive that
Hello David
I didn't expect a rather lengthy reply from you.
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2021 at 9:29 AM
> From: "David"
> To: "debian-user mailing list"
> Subject: Re: How do I get back the GRUB menu with the blue background?
>
>
> grub> echo "$prefix"
>
The reply is (hd0,gpt1)/boot/grub
>
> 6)
Hi,
On 2021-07-10 3:46 a.m., Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've wrote a message regarding my MTA.
>>
>> I was thinking it's corrected but...
>>
>> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server
>> Got
Hi,
On 2021-07-10 3:25 a.m., Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:20:24AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>> I receive the following regarding messages sent on the mailing list...
>
> A usual dmarc report, and you receive that because your domain has DMARC
> po
hey,
i disabled apache2-doc.conf in apache2 via a2disconf, but after the latest
update it was enabled again w/o my consent. at least i got a message in the
apt-get output.
i do not like my decisions being ingnored since i disabled it for a reason.
it would be nice if the maintainers would ch
Hi David
> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2021 at 4:52 AM
> From: "David Wright"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: How do I get back the GRUB menu with the blue background?
>
>
> I find the Grub installation prompts in the d-i very confusing.
> I'm wondering whether your process incorrec
Hi.
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
> I've wrote a message regarding my MTA.
>
> I was thinking it's corrected but...
>
> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server
> Got some idea ?
Your MTA signs these headers:
Content-T
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 06:28:21PM -0400, Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside wrote:
>
> --
> Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
> https://www.polynamaude.com/
>
> -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
>
> *Mise en garde concernant la confidentialité*
>
> La présente communication est confidentiel
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:43:56PM +0300, Kevin N. wrote:
> Not sure if that is the case here, but sometimes mailing list
> software alters the original message headers which then can lead to
> failed DKIM signature checks.
Most probably. This is a known problem. DKIM is (roughly speaking) a
signa
Hi.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:20:24AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> I receive the following regarding messages sent on the mailing list...
A usual dmarc report, and you receive that because your domain has DMARC
policy set that way - it's a TXT record _dmarc.polynamaude
43 matches
Mail list logo
