On Sun, 2019-11-10 at 19:37 +, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 10 Nov 2019 at 10:26:17 -0800, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> [...]
> > One thing you could try is to examine the iptables rule counters
> > daily/weekly. If the counters do not increase during some
> > interval,
> > then the rule is no longer usef
On Sunday 10 November 2019 18:07:37 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 10 November 2019 16:07:22 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 10:55:03AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Sunday 10 November 2019 08:02:46 Michael wrote:
> > >
> > > Which contains such gems as this:
> > > coyot
On Sunday 10 November 2019 16:07:22 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 10:55:03AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 10 November 2019 08:02:46 Michael wrote:
> >
> > Which contains such gems as this:
> > coyote.coyote.den:80 40.77.167.79 - -
> > [10/Nov/2019:10:44:45 -0500] "G
On Sunday 10 November 2019 14:37:58 Brian wrote:
> On Sun 10 Nov 2019 at 10:26:17 -0800, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> > Brian writes:
> > > On Sun 10 Nov 2019 at 11:01:07 +0100, Michael wrote:
> > >> On Saturday, November 9, 2019 7:01:00 PM CET, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >> > I was able, with the help o
nipponm...@firemail.cc wrote:
> Oh great, threats and power-plays.
>
> Alexandre François Garreau:
Got curious who is lexandre François Garreau
https://hackernoon.com/avatars/2G4JnXIXjRVO9GPsF8rTiRgmEUm1.png
:D :D :D :D
Brother, I don't know you, but please, relax!
There are 1000s of that ki
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 10:55:03AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 10 November 2019 08:02:46 Michael wrote:
> Which contains such gems as this:
> coyote.coyote.den:80 40.77.167.79 - -
> [10/Nov/2019:10:44:45 -0500] "GET /gene/fence/18.html HTTP/1.1" 200
> 1121 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CP
On Sun 10 Nov 2019 at 10:26:17 -0800, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> > On Sun 10 Nov 2019 at 11:01:07 +0100, Michael wrote:
> >
> >> On Saturday, November 9, 2019 7:01:00 PM CET, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>
> >> > I was able, with the help of another responder to carve up some iptables
On 11/10/19 8:55 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Thats an approximate idea of my understanding how it works, but to
> gradually transit from manual reading of the logs and applying iptable
> rules to block the miscreants, the first step would seem to indicate
> training fail2ban to read the same log
Brian writes:
> On Sun 10 Nov 2019 at 11:01:07 +0100, Michael wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, November 9, 2019 7:01:00 PM CET, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>
>> > I was able, with the help of another responder to carve up some iptables
>> > rules to stop the DDOS that semrush, yandex, bingbot, and 2 or 3 other
On Sunday 10 November 2019 08:02:46 Michael wrote:
> On Sunday, November 10, 2019 1:39:24 PM CET, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 07:04:12AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Sunday 10 November 2019 06:19:51 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:08:52AM -050
On 2019-11-09, deloptes wrote:
>
> I recall I read back then that this is imposed by Apple
What is "this" and what is its relation to the OP's original, erroneous
ratiocination (usb = UVC, the latter being a specification to which the
device in question most probably does not comply, an inference
On Sunday, November 10, 2019 1:39:24 PM CET, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 07:04:12AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Sunday 10 November 2019 06:19:51 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:08:52AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
But... you can just configure your Apac
On Sun 10 Nov 2019 at 11:01:07 +0100, Michael wrote:
> On Saturday, November 9, 2019 7:01:00 PM CET, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> > I was able, with the help of another responder to carve up some iptables
> > rules to stop the DDOS that semrush, yandex, bingbot, and 2 or 3 others
> > were bound to do
deloptes wrote:
> Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > It's typical for standards-compliant hardware to work well on
> > Linux, Windows and Mac OS without issue. When it doesn't, it's
> > probably not standards-compliant.
>
> I recall I read back then that this is imposed by Apple - you have to do
> somethin
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 07:04:12AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 10 November 2019 06:19:51 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:08:52AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> > - assess client behaviour
[...]
> Humm. That would take a user-agent trigger [...]
Bingo.
On Sunday 10 November 2019 06:19:51 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:08:52AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > But, I'm getting the impression that it has to fail before fail2ban
> > kicks in [...]
>
> No. It has to "succeed" once before fail2ban can do its job. It is:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:08:52AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> But, I'm getting the impression that it has to fail before fail2ban kicks
> in [...]
No. It has to "succeed" once before fail2ban can do its job. It is:
- assess client behaviour
- http server writes a log entry (or a set
On Sunday 10 November 2019 05:01:07 Michael wrote:
> On Saturday, November 9, 2019 7:01:00 PM CET, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Whats this "jail"? The beginners tut seems to assume we've all had
> > cs101 thru cs401 and Just Know all the secret handshakes bs already.
>
> no idea what you're talking abo
On Saturday, November 9, 2019 7:01:00 PM CET, Gene Heskett wrote:
Whats this "jail"? The beginners tut seems to assume we've all had cs101
thru cs401 and Just Know all the secret handshakes bs already.
no idea what you're talking about... i almost never read any tutorial, just
man pages. that'
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 11:04:30PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 09 Nov 2019 at 23:15:00 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [...] no brexit :)
>
> Can I do the Leader of the Free World, Trump, instead? :)
Uh-oh. You're about to extend Godwin.
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
20 matches
Mail list logo
