This problem arised recently after an upgrade (running sid)
How do I remove the first default route in this list?
ip route del default
does not do it. When I disable enp0s25 the second line (via 192.168.1.1)
will be the only and correct default route. In that case "ip route del
default" wil re
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 23:59:36 +0200
Sebastian Hofmann wrote:
> I gave it a try and it did just fine for multiple devices.
I take it that by "it" you mean apcupsd.
> Problem is
> that there is at least one NAS I would like to connect which has only
> support for nut. Since all devices support nut,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 4/10/19 6:17 am, Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 20:54:10 +0100 Brian
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Opening an email causes no problem to the system on Debian. We
>> would be in deep trouble if it did.
>
> That has been my experience, but I did bri
Yes Brian - precisely.
Thanks.
And Joe has repeated you, with a few suggestions to 'improve' the situation.
Now to convince people to switch. I believe it is easier than adjusting
to recent updates elsewhere, but...
Worth trying though.
Keith Bainbridge
keithrbaugro...@gmail.
David Parker wrote:
> I'm starting to suspect that this is mostly a bluetooth issue and not
> really a PA one. I struggle to get these earbuds connected whether
> PulseAudio is involved or not. I can trust them and pair them just fine,
> but the actual connection generally fails, and when it doe
>> Therefore I want to use both packages at the same
>> time,
> I suspect you will find that apcupsd is sufficient. I run apcupsd here
> with two UPSs and multiple clients for each. I had never heard of nut
> until I read your email.
I gave it a try and it did just fine for multiple devices. Pro
Hi,
I'm starting to suspect that this is mostly a bluetooth issue and not
really a PA one. I struggle to get these earbuds connected whether
PulseAudio is involved or not. I can trust them and pair them just fine,
but the actual connection generally fails, and when it does work, it
doesn't stay
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 20:54:10 +0100
Brian wrote:
>
> Opening an email causes no problem to the system on Debian. We would
> be in deep trouble if it did.
That has been my experience, but I did bring some cautious habits from
Windows, I don't render HTML and don't use a preview window and I
do
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:40:53 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 08:35:32PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> > Debian web page about testing is saying that testing gets infrequent
> > security updates
>
> It's more accurate to say that testing does not get ANY security
> updates. Not
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 08:54:37PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> yes sorry, I realized I made an error and should have typed
> bullseye for main and unstable for security updates just after pressing
> send.
> but you say not to do that ?
Correct. If you want to run unstable, just run unstable.
On 2019-10-03 20:40, Greg Wooledge wrote:
YOU DO NOT MIX STABLE WITH TESTING.
YOU DO NOT MIX STABLE WITH UNSTABLE.
YOU DO NOT MIX TESTING WITH UNSTABLE.
If you use one of these, you use that one only. No mixing.
No Frankendebians.
https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian
yes sorry, I reali
On Thu 03 Oct 2019 at 10:28:58 +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>
> On 3/10/19 5:05 am, Brian wrote:
> > The starting post has nothing to do with Debian and, one may notice, the
> > OP has not reappeared to join the conversation and give his considered
> > opinion. It's a typical c'mon post which s
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 08:35:32PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> Debian web page about testing is saying that testing gets infrequent
> security updates
It's more accurate to say that testing does not get ANY security updates.
Not in any realistic sense. Packages migrate from unstable into testing,
I didn't type previous correctly did I.
that would be
bullseye for main and unstable for security updates in sources.lists.
Is that what people do ?
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
hello,
Debian web page about testing is saying that testing gets infrequent
security updates and that you can get more frequent security updates
from unstable.
Is that what people do ?
have buster for main and bullseye for security updates in sources.list ?
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
David Parker wrote:
> Thanks for the additional information. Unfortunately, the connection
> problems have returned and I haven't made any progress in solving them.
> When I kill the pulseaudio process, it simply restarts itself and I'm
> unable to stop this behavior, so I therefore can't run it
Gerard ROBIN wrote:
>> What exactly bugs you about the signed kernel? The kernel is so big
>> that the extra signatures hardly make a difference.
> I read somewhere that the signed kernel was for the "secure boot" of
> microsoft and I have nothing of microsoft on my machine, so that's why
> I ins
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:47:38 +0200
Sebastian Hofmann wrote:
> Therefore I want to use both packages at the same
> time,
I suspect you will find that apcupsd is sufficient. I run apcupsd here
with two UPSs and multiple clients for each. I had never heard of nut
until I read your email.
> My quest
Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Il 14/09/19 22:30, Mike Kupfer ha scritto:
>
> > Andrea Borgia wrote:
> >> how do I get xfce to use xscreensaver as
> >> locking when suspending?
>
> > For Xfce4 4.12, it's on the Advanced tab of the Session and Startup
> > settings.
[...]
> I have xfce4 4.14 but I don't s
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 02:51:29PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 14:51:29 +0200
> From: Sven Joachim
> To: Gerard ROBIN , debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: kernel unsigned
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)
> X-Spam-Flag: NO
>
> On 2019-
On Thursday 03 October 2019 09:24:16 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, October 03, 2019 09:03:57 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 October 2019 08:05:27 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > (I'm still using Wheezy with kmail 1.13.7 as my daily driver.)
> >
> > Wow! Thats newer than mine
On Thursday, October 03, 2019 09:03:57 AM Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 03 October 2019 08:05:27 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > (I'm still using Wheezy with kmail 1.13.7 as my daily driver.)
>
> Wow! Thats newer than mine, but I'm running TDE. But the emphasis on
> progress for TDE has been o
On 2019-10-03, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, October 03, 2019 06:23:20 AM Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> There have been numerous bugs with LookOut (otherwise known as
>> Outlook), running scripts and having other vulnerabilities due to
>> preview pane being open. I try to encourage people
On Thursday 03 October 2019 08:05:27 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, October 03, 2019 06:23:20 AM Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> > There have been numerous bugs with LookOut (otherwise known as
> > Outlook), running scripts and having other vulnerabilities due to
> > preview pane being open.
On 2019-10-03 12:05 +0200, Gerard ROBIN wrote:
> Hello,
> In my BULLSEYE box, when i make "apt upgrade" if a new kernel is installed
> it is a signed kernel that is installed, but on my machine it is an unsigned
> kernel that I chose to install.
Why did you do that in the first place?
> How can
On Thursday, October 03, 2019 06:23:20 AM Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> There have been numerous bugs with LookOut (otherwise known as
> Outlook), running scripts and having other vulnerabilities due to
> preview pane being open. I try to encourage people NOT to have a
> preview pane, but people will
Hello guys,
so I got a new UPS from APC and need to connect multiple systems with
the network ups tools which are provided in the 'nut' package. Since I
plan on using the USB connection and the UPS model is not directly
supported by 'nut', I need 'apcupsd' and connect via the given driver
(see htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 3/10/19 10:28 am, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
...
Well, given the fact that too many emails these days are HTML type;
ala web based they are suspect to email programs running
javascript and/or other scripting languages due to default setting
Hello,
In my BULLSEYE box, when i make "apt upgrade" if a new kernel is installed
it is a signed kernel that is installed, but on my machine it is an unsigned
kernel that I chose to install. How can you force "apt" to install the
unsigned kernel?
For example:
the kernel linux-image-5.2.0-2-amd64-un
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 07:30:19AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
[...]
> On the contrary. The usb-storage module has a parameter "quirks"
> which allows to ignore the write-protect flag for a specific vid:pid
> device (I do not remember the exact syntax). I was afraid that it
> could be used to b
So it's not just 4 major regional hospitals here. Could it be the
attacks are connected.
By the bye, I a current-time documentary earlier this year, in a local
public hospital with what looked very like WinXP on the monitor behind
the doctor being interviewed.
Keith Bainbridge
keithrbaug
31 matches
Mail list logo
