Solution here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/csc3vt/buster_i_can_access_smb_share_from_windows_10/exe050g/
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:07 PM Judah Richardson
wrote:
> On Debian Buster, I have a shared folder that lives on a btrfs raid1
> array. It's located at
> /mnt/ToshibaL200BtrfsRA
On Debian Buster, I have a shared folder that lives on a btrfs raid1 array.
It's located at
/mnt/ToshibaL200BtrfsRAID1/@/Backup/luckyBackup/HPProBook4530s
I would like to ensure that my samba user and mine alone has read/write
access to that folder.
I cloned the permissions from my home folder to
Thanks all, I wound up just using @monthly instead.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 4:56 AM Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2019-08-18 08:10 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> > Judah Richardson wrote:
> >
> >> In FreeBSD and derived OSes, you can use @n, where n is a number, to
> >> indicate that a task should be
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 23:43:35 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
> > wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally.
> > >
> > >
> > > Google's evil come
I am allergic to ads.
So I use an adblocker, ublock origin.
I have squid and privoxy proxy's running.
Have a local searx as search engine.
99.% of the visited sites are without ads, no tracking.
Hope this helps.
> Question: is this due to a belief that such sites are (at least for
> your
On 8/18/19 5:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Yeah. And Firefox has a checkbox in the prefs to block pop-ups. I rarely
see a pop-up any more.
I have a hard time believing DDG is what's doing your pop-ups. It'd
destroy their reputation.
On 19/08/2019 08:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
This is actually for me a filter criterion: if a site doesn't work
with javascript, chances are high that I avoid it. I do make some
exceptions, but very few.
I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Da
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > > functionality of interest. I surf
Here is the output when it is working:
aplay -l
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC269VC Analog [ALC269VC Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:06:57 -0400
John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> Hello today, I've got an Ideapad and after I suspend I cannot get the
> audio to work when the system resumes.
>
> lspci -v returns the following for the audio section:
>
> 00:0e.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device 3198 (rev 0
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:19:28PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
> wrote:
[...]
> > > less secure apps" option, and then configure POP3 / SMTP normally.
> >
> >
> > Google's evil comes through the backdoor, without making any noise,
> > like Wormt
On 18-08-19 22:04, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
h
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:10:35 +0200
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:24:49 +
> > loredana wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > secure applications, this is likely not to be a viable solution (it
> > > seems that google is going to forbit l
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> > experience problems I see o
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> experience problems I see often reported. YMMV
It does vary indeed. It seems to me that hardly
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
>
> steef wrote:
> > hi folks,
> >
> > last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> > DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
> > happy with the popup of
On 18-08-19 21:20, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', other
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy with the popup of unwan
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked
perman
Hello today, I've got an Ideapad and after I suspend I cannot get the
audio to work when the system resumes.
lspci -v returns the following for the audio section:
00:0e.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Device 3198 (rev 03)
Subsystem: Lenovo Device 3807
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0,
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
> happy with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked
> permanently: and the last thing m
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be happy
with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked permanently: and the last thing makes me suspicious. please, if it is possible, an
expert op
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 04:56:34PM +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/18/2019 3:19 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> >>> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >>>
> Hi,
>
> While upgra
On 8/18/2019 3:19 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
>
>> On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
>>> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
>>>
Hi,
While upgrading the dbus deamon, I get the following:
"A reboot is required t
On Sun 18 Aug 2019 at 12:17:59 +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> While upgrading the dbus deamon, I get the following:
> >>
> >> "A reboot is required to replace the running dbus-daemon.
> >>
On 8/17/2019 8:15 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 13 Aug 2019 at 20:07:49 +0200, john doe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> While upgrading the dbus deamon, I get the following:
>>
>> "A reboot is required to replace the running dbus-daemon.
>> Please reboot the system when convenient."
>>
>>
>> I have no plan to re
On 2019-08-18 08:10 +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Judah Richardson wrote:
>
>> In FreeBSD and derived OSes, you can use @n, where n is a number, to
>> indicate that a task should be started n seconds after its previous
>> invocation completed.
>
>> I couldn't find anything like that in the Debian c
27 matches
Mail list logo
