Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

On 6/19/19 2:04 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Or, a better question, is it within reach to run a Debian Pure Blend on Teres-I without an external SD card? If so, is Dan Ritter right that it will be 2x to 8x faster? Yes, it certainly is within reach, just needs someone to do the reaching. This see

Re: just mail forwarding to smart mailer

On Sb, 13 apr 19, 10:14:04, Bonno Bloksma wrote: > I am looking for an "easy light weight just empty the local queue and > send it to the smart host" setup. > I don't mind experimenting and it doesn not need to be Exim but the > info I get Googling is just too diverse and does not get me much >

Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster

Hi. On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 01:03:50AM +0200, Matthew Crews wrote: > On 6/19/19 3:30 PM, Lazar Tadić wrote: > > Don't worry Mathew, 32-bit arch is currently 2nd most popular arch on > > Debian. There's no way it will be dropped even after Buster. > > Curious, where can one look up these n

Re: Giving remaja (teens) group full administrator privileges through sudo - dangerous?

On 20/06/19 4:56 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> That is almost as bad as having no security restrictions at all. The >> correct thing to do would be to set permissions on the programs to >> allow them to be run by group remaja. > What I thought that the correct way is to configure sudoers so that > re

libmkl-full-dev breaks BLAS?

I have encountered this problem while using R on buster. 1. From main install from R with packages "caret" and "pls" 2. From non-free install libmkl-full-dev. When prompted confirm to use MKL in BLAS/LAPACK/ETC. Train some statistical model using caret with method pls. The results are drastically

Re: big-cursor DOA in Stretch

On 6/19/19, Bob Bernstein wrote: > This package has been one of the few casualties in my Jessie to > Stretch upgrade. Joey's notes for it are here: > > /usr/share/doc/big-cursor/README.Debian > > ...and per Joey I have rem'd out the offending line in > /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources: > > #Xcursor.theme:

Re: Re: Giving remaja (teens) group full administrator privileges through sudo - dangerous?

That is almost as bad as having no security restrictions at all. The correct thing to do would be to set permissions on the programs to allow them to be run by group remaja. What I thought that the correct way is to configure sudoers so that remaja group can access programs that they absolutely r

big-cursor DOA in Stretch

This package has been one of the few casualties in my Jessie to Stretch upgrade. Joey's notes for it are here: /usr/share/doc/big-cursor/README.Debian ...and per Joey I have rem'd out the offending line in /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources: #Xcursor.theme: whiteglass Yes, as luck would have it, when

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

On 6/19/19 3:40 AM, deloptes wrote: David Christensen wrote: I have tried running machines without swap, but found that they crashed. Now I always include a 1 GB swap partition when installing. why not using swap (if disk space is available) disk space is cheap. I built systems on USB flash

Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster

On 6/19/19 3:30 PM, Lazar Tadić wrote: > Don't worry Mathew, 32-bit arch is currently 2nd most popular arch on > Debian. There's no way it will be dropped even after Buster. > Curious, where can one look up these numbers? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster

Don't worry Mathew, 32-bit arch is currently 2nd most popular arch on Debian. There's no way it will be dropped even after Buster.

Re: Does 32-bit x86 support (aka [multilib] ) have a future with Debian after Buster?

On 19/06/19 9:32 AM, Matthew Crews wrote: > I won't be surprised when Debian stops shipping ISOs for 32-bit x86 > support, as the demand for this architecture is rapidly declining with > each Debian release. I hope it doesn't happen too soon. I have multiple 32-bit machines which are still perfect

Re: java browser plugin on buster

On 20/06/19 6:18 AM, basti wrote: > Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this > version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart). > > in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in > "portable" mode. > > now the icedtea plugin seem not a

Re: Error on Buster while signing rpms

On 6/19/2019 8:10 PM, Ulf Volmer wrote: > On 19.06.19 17:03, john doe wrote: >> Hi, I'm trying to gpg sign rpms on Debian Buster but I'm getting the >> following: >> >> $ rpm --resign *.rpm >> *.rpm: >> error: Could not exec gpg: No such file or directory > > Pass --define "__gpg /usr/bin/gpg" to y

Re: java browser plugin on buster

On 19.06.19 20:18, basti wrote: > Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this > version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart). > > in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in > "portable" mode. > > now the icedtea plugin seem not ava

java browser plugin on buster

Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart). in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in "portable" mode. now the icedtea plugin seem not available anymore. does someone konw how to get i

Java Browser Plugin Buster

Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart). in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in "portable" mode. now the icedtea plugin seem not available anymore. does someone konw how to get i

Re: Okay, let's get X workingg on my new Stretch

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:57:26PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > I've never run startx as root, and have no idea what's supposed to > be the result. I have, for testing purposes. When trying to get firmware/drivers working, it's nice to just log in as root and do all the steps that way. If you do

Re: Error on Buster while signing rpms

On 19.06.19 17:03, john doe wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to gpg sign rpms on Debian Buster but I'm getting the > following: > > $ rpm --resign *.rpm > *.rpm: > error: Could not exec gpg: No such file or directory Pass --define "__gpg /usr/bin/gpg" to you rpm command. Works for me on sid. Or add this (

Re: Okay, let's get X workingg on my new Stretch

On Tue 18 Jun 2019 at 18:48:52 (-0400), Bob Bernstein wrote: > I put this into google: "systemd X windows Debian" and was brought > here: > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch07.en.html … which includes the statement "The entire X architecture is considered insecure if run as

Re: Error on Buster while signing rpms

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:55:30PM +0200, john doe wrote: > On 6/19/2019 5:34 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:31:41PM +0200, john doe wrote: > >> On 6/19/2019 5:25 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:03:20PM +0200, john doe wrote: > Hi, I'm t

Re: M2 form factor SSD

we have 3 HP 820 Elitebooks, they all have the m.2 slot. they are plug and play, a second SSD in all respects. I bought another one on eBay a couple months ago: 512GB 512G NGFF M2 2242 SATA SSD

Re: Error on Buster while signing rpms

On 6/19/2019 5:34 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:31:41PM +0200, john doe wrote: >> On 6/19/2019 5:25 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:03:20PM +0200, john doe wrote: Hi, I'm trying to gpg sign rpms on Debian Buster but I'm getting the fol

Re: Error on Buster while signing rpms

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:31:41PM +0200, john doe wrote: > On 6/19/2019 5:25 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:03:20PM +0200, john doe wrote: > >> Hi, I'm trying to gpg sign rpms on Debian Buster but I'm getting the > >> following: > >> > >> $ rpm --resign *.rpm > >> *.rpm

Re: Error on Buster while signing rpms

On 6/19/2019 5:25 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:03:20PM +0200, john doe wrote: >> Hi, I'm trying to gpg sign rpms on Debian Buster but I'm getting the >> following: >> >> $ rpm --resign *.rpm >> *.rpm: >> error: Could not exec gpg: No such file or directory >> >> Where th

Re: Error on Buster while signing rpms

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 05:03:20PM +0200, john doe wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to gpg sign rpms on Debian Buster but I'm getting the > following: > > $ rpm --resign *.rpm > *.rpm: > error: Could not exec gpg: No such file or directory > > Where the '*' is the name of the rpm. Apt-get install gnupg?

Error on Buster while signing rpms

Hi, I'm trying to gpg sign rpms on Debian Buster but I'm getting the following: $ rpm --resign *.rpm *.rpm: error: Could not exec gpg: No such file or directory Where the '*' is the name of the rpm. Doing the same command on Stretch works but I get this error on a fresh install of Buster. Googli

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

Erik Josefsson wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On 6/18/19 11:57 PM, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019, 4:10 PM Erik Josefsson < > > > erik.hjalmar.josefs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > The Ubuntu version that Teres-I comes with feels almost as good, which > > >

Re: Okay, let's get X workingg on my new Stretch

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 07:21:35PM -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > The gods of security have decreed that instead of startx you must use a > display > manager to login and start your X session. Utter nonsense. startx works in every release of Debian. Every single one. I use it myself. Be aware th

Example of an M2 form factor SSD (was: Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 10:06:41 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > About the only thing I'd add to what others have said is that they now make > SSDs in a different form factor -- if you look for them, they start with an > M, iirc -- they are in the same size range as an SD card (well, a regular > o

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

Quoting Erik Josefsson (2019-06-19 13:38:32) > On 6/19/19 1:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Quoting deloptes (2019-06-19 12:42:13) > >> Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> > >>> In short, you really_really_ want netinstall from MicroSD! > >> What about debootstrap? IS it possible to use it for that

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

On 6/19/19 1:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting deloptes (2019-06-19 12:42:13) Jonas Smedegaard wrote: In short, you really_really_ want netinstall from MicroSD! What about debootstrap? IS it possible to use it for that SoC? Certainly. Debian-installer uses debootstrap internally so t

Re: Giving remaja (teens) group full administrator privileges through sudo - dangerous?

On 6/19/19 12:06 AM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: Hello all Debian Users, Consider the hypothetical scenario below. I often encountered cases on systems in television stations when they configured sudoers like this snippet below: %remaja ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL The rationale for above is most programs o

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

Quoting deloptes (2019-06-19 12:42:13) > Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > In short, you really _really_ want netinstall from MicroSD! > > What about debootstrap? IS it possible to use it for that SoC? Certainly. Debian-installer uses debootstrap internally so that is a must. The images Erik has

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > In short, you really _really_ want netinstall from MicroSD! What about debootstrap? IS it possible to use it for that SoC?

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

David Christensen wrote: > I have considered installing and running Debian on SD cards.  At this > point, I would probably choose a "high endurance" device rather than a > "fast' device, because I want the system to last.  (The few solid-state > device failures I have seen all followed the same pa

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

Quoting Erik Josefsson (2019-06-19 11:53:51) > You don't happen to see in the spec. which boot key to press to get > Teres-I to start a netinstall from USB? Whereas boot from USB is (nowadays, wasn't always) comon among IBM-compatible PCs, that is not common among ARM devices, and it is not sup

Re: System on a chip - performance relative size and setup (how can the (Debian) setup make a difference?)

Hi Dan, On 6/18/19 11:57 PM, Dan Ritter wrote: Nicholas Geovanis wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2019, 4:10 PM Erik Josefsson < erik.hjalmar.josefs...@gmail.com> wrote: The Ubuntu version that Teres-I comes with feels almost as good, which is why I still don't understand why running Debian from the SD

Quotation Inquiry #RFQ170619E - New Supplier

Hello, Our partners referred your company to us. Regarding your great products. Please see required products, quantity and specifications as attached. Kindly give us your lowest possible prices for FCL shipment. Best Regards, Wanda Rodriguez Purchase Assistant Hidroconta Trading Ltd. Av. de S