Hello,
I am HQ Metrics Links Service
I have 1000+ sites with unimaginable metrics
Trust Flow until 54, Domain Authority until 42, and Domain Rating until 54
20 more categories
My High-Quality Metrics Links can boost your metrics website
We can speak the small print for lists and worth if you inter
Hello colleagues.
when I try
vblade-persist restart all
It appears to me
warning: /var/lib/vblade-persist/vblades/e0.0: unable to open supervise/ok:
file does not exist
Any suggestions? The file if it is where it says and with all the permissions.
> On Mar 14, 2019, at 1:29 PM, Ric Moore wrote
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:30 PM Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2019-03-14 12:24 -0400, Default User wrote:
>
> > Hello . . .
> >
> > I am running Debian Unstable, x86, up to date.
> >
> > Last night, I did an update as usual. Several packages were updated,
> > including updating the kernel from linux-i
On 2019-03-14 12:24 -0400, Default User wrote:
> Hello . . .
>
> I am running Debian Unstable, x86, up to date.
>
> Last night, I did an update as usual. Several packages were updated,
> including updating the kernel from linux-image-4.19.0-3-amd64
> to linux-image-4.19.0-4-amd64.
>
> Then I reboo
On 3/13/19 4:22 PM, Eriel Perez wrote:
Hola colegas.
cuando intento
vblade-persist restart all
me dice:
warning: /var/lib/vblade-persist/vblades/e0.0: unable to open
supervise/ok: file does not exist
Alguna sugerencia. El fichero si esta donde dice y con todos los permisos.
Wrong list
Hello . . .
I am running Debian Unstable, x86, up to date.
Last night, I did an update as usual. Several packages were updated,
including updating the kernel from linux-image-4.19.0-3-amd64
to linux-image-4.19.0-4-amd64.
Then I rebooted. During the reboot process this message appeared, line
afte
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:19:35AM -0400, deb wrote:
>
> I guess I do not see Microsoft doing this less in 2019.
>
> It just has changed from one product [WordPro, Lotus 1-2-3; Spinrite; dBase
> Netscape] to entire infrastructures.
>
> e.g.
>
> Microsoft is "open sourcing" Windows Calculator an
On 3/14/2019 1:58 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Does it help understanding what I'm trying to do?
>
> It just confirms what I guessed. Did you try my suggestion?
>
Thanks to Your answer and the one by "Dan Purgert " I now
have the bit I was missing; add routing on server a to let server a know
abo
On 3/14/19 10:35 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 13 Mar 2019 at 23:19:09 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2019 22:19:37 David wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 08:24, wrote:
On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 04:51:57 PM deb wrote:
* they sleep with Microsoft of E-E-E fame.
Ok,
On Wed 13 Mar 2019 at 23:19:09 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 March 2019 22:19:37 David wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 08:24, wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 04:51:57 PM deb wrote:
> > > >* they sleep with Microsoft of E-E-E fame.
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll bite -- what
On Thursday, March 14, 2019 04:26:06 AM john doe wrote:
> By the answers in this thread, I guess I need to explane what I have and
> what I'm trying to do.
As someone observing from the peanut gallery, it would help me if the
explanation was a little less detailed -- sort of an overview.
Let me
> Does it help understanding what I'm trying to do?
It just confirms what I guessed. Did you try my suggestion?
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Joe wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:26:06 +0100
> john doe wrote:
>> [...]
>> By the answers in this thread, I guess I need to explane what I have
>> and what I'm trying to do.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> For now both server (a and b) are responsible for MA
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:26:06 +0100
john doe wrote:
> On 3/13/2019 1:39 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> Ip range on server a: 172.17.232.0/24
> >> IP range on server b: 192.168.3.0/24
> >
> > That's very vague.
> > But I'll assume that your "server b" has an address 172.17.232.NN
> > on one netwo
On 2019-03-14 08:26, john doe wrote:
On 3/13/2019 1:39 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Ip range on server a: 172.17.232.0/24
IP range on server b: 192.168.3.0/24
That's very vague.
But I'll assume that your "server b" has an address 172.17.232.NN
on one network interface and 192.168.3.1 on another.
On 3/13/2019 1:39 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Ip range on server a: 172.17.232.0/24
>> IP range on server b: 192.168.3.0/24
>
> That's very vague.
> But I'll assume that your "server b" has an address 172.17.232.NN
> on one network interface and 192.168.3.1 on another.
>
>> If I enable MASQUERADIN
16 matches
Mail list logo
