On Saturday, February 03, 2018 06:14:11 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 09:43:33PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > I am trying to suggest one would want to move faster than the approximate
> > cycle time of new stable releases here.
>
> You have been repeatedly told
On 3 February 2018 at 23:14, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 09:43:33PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > I am trying to suggest one would want to move faster than the approximate
> > cycle time of new stable releases here.
>
> You have been repeatedly told that the upda
Hello,
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 09:43:33PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> I am trying to suggest one would want to move faster than the approximate
> cycle time of new stable releases here.
You have been repeatedly told that the updates will appear as
security updates in Debian stable when the
On 3 February 2018 at 17:24, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 10:37:34 (-0500), Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> > On 2/3/18, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > >> On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
> > >> > D
On 3 February 2018 at 21:43, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3 February 2018 at 17:12, David Wright
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 07:47:43 (+), Michael Fothergill wrote:
>> > On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>>
On 3 February 2018 at 17:12, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 07:47:43 (+), Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:53:36AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > > > Thus for anyone in the
For those locked into the Firefox password manager (with--and maybe even
without--master password) who wish to escape (maybe I'm the only one),
there is a liberating python script here:
https://github.com/unode/firefox_decrypt
(Maybe I'm the only one again, but I'll be damned if I knew how to
dow
On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 10:37:34 (-0500), Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> On 2/3/18, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >> On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
> >> > Debian
> >> > already has a place to test the latest and great
On Sat 03 Feb 2018 at 07:47:43 (+), Michael Fothergill wrote:
> On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:53:36AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > > Thus for anyone in the entire world who is new to linux,the most
> > > efficient route
On 3 February 2018 at 15:37, Cindy-Sue Causey
wrote:
> On 2/3/18, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >> On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
> >> > Debian
> >> > already has a place to test the latest and greatest (and
On 2/3/18, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael Fothergill wrote:
>> On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
>> > Debian
>> > already has a place to test the latest and greatest (and most
>> > broken) versions of packages and it is not the stable r
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 10:01:01AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
Michael Stone wrote:
I've had far fewer issues with systemd than I did before systemd. Now
that our anecdotes have canceled each other out, could you please
refrain from irrelevant systemd complaining in the future?
this is a bit arrog
On Saturday, February 03, 2018 02:47:43 AM Michael Fothergill wrote:
> On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
> > Debian
> > already has a place to test the latest and greatest (and most
> > broken) versions of packages and it is not the stable release that
> > new users are directed at.
>
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Please, don't kindle that flames. We all know by now which
> preferences we have. Don't try to frame it as an "us vs them"
> issue. That's more or less what I tried to tell Michael as
> well, I hope I succeeded a bit.
surely not. we've had enough discussion on the topic
Le 02/02/2018 à 10:28, Curt a écrit :
Maybe an encrypted swap is overkill in a home alone machine; I am now
idly wondering whether there exists any documented (and successful) remote
unencrypted swap attacks.
Why "remote" ? AFAIK, disk encryption is against physical attacks, not
remote attack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 10:01:01AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Stone wrote:
>
> > I've had far fewer issues with systemd than I did before systemd. Now
> > that our anecdotes have canceled each other out, could you please
> > refrain from irrelev
Michael Stone wrote:
> I've had far fewer issues with systemd than I did before systemd. Now
> that our anecdotes have canceled each other out, could you please
> refrain from irrelevant systemd complaining in the future?
this is a bit arrogant as I did not complain, but asked a question on a pos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:30:11PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 11:06:28PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> >just a question if you are not using notebooks or even workstations, why
> >would you need systemd?
>
> because it generally
On 2 February 2018 at 04:35, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:53:36AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > Thus for anyone in the entire world who is new to linux,the most
> > efficient route at present could well be to install Fedora and be
> > stable and spectre protect
19 matches
Mail list logo
