On 2014-11-24, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> It seems dsndynamic.com bit the dust this weekend of the 23 of November.
> Is there an alternative of a free dsn server?
I have been using dnsdynamic for a few years and saw that it was
down over the weekend, but it is working again for me now.
Try http:
Hi,
I am getting crazy with iceweasel not opening dolphin for "containing folders".
I searched the web for hours and tried everything I found.
Working with
mimeTypes.rdf in personal iceweasel folder
~/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list
/etc/gnome/defaults.list (I am running KDE but have g
On 25/11/14 15:14, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 at 11:03 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> I don't know whether /etc/apt/apt.conf is processed before
>> fragments in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d - but I'd be interested in
>> learning. Anyone??
>
> Now that you bring it up, I'd be interested in that m
On 11/24/2014 at 11:03 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> I don't know whether /etc/apt/apt.conf is processed before fragments
> in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d - but I'd be interested in learning.
> Anyone??
Now that you bring it up, I'd be interested in that myself. Fortunately,
it's trivially discoverable:
CORRECTION
On 25/11/14 14:25, Charlie wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:02:37 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
>
>> On 25/11/14 13:02, Charlie wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:24:29 +0200 Andrei POPESCU sent:
>>>
>> Notes:-
>> *Fragments are processed in alpha order (numbers, then the following
>> lett
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:02:37 +1100 Scott Ferguson sent:
> On 25/11/14 13:02, Charlie wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:24:29 +0200 Andrei POPESCU sent:
> >
> >> Because of this I set
> >>
> >> APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant "false";
> >>
> >> in apt.conf
> >
> > I have no apt.conf but I
On 25/11/14 13:02, Charlie wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:24:29 +0200 Andrei POPESCU sent:
>
>> Because of this I set
>>
>> APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant "false";
>>
>> in apt.conf
>
> I have no apt.conf but I do have an /etc/apt/apt.conf.d directory?
>
> Am I missing an apt.conf file
On 11/24/2014 04:16 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 24 nov 14, 08:02:44, Marty wrote:
It was a policy vote. The only "results" that matter are their effect
on Debian Policy, right? The rest is academic.
The vote invoked a clause in the TC init decision to allow modifying or
overturning the po
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 23:24:29 +0200 Andrei POPESCU sent:
> Because of this I set
>
> APT::AutoRemove::SuggestsImportant "false";
>
> in apt.conf
I have no apt.conf but I do have an /etc/apt/apt.conf.d directory?
Am I missing an apt.conf file and should one be added?
Charlie
--
Re
Since updating to kernel 3.16-1-686-pae (and with newer ones), when
I start X I usually get a back-lit blank screen. Switching back to
vt1 usually works (shows the X dialog); switching to vt7 a second
time usually works (shows my X session), but sometimes not. Once X
works, going back to vt1 almo
I've had the "Oh no! Something went wrong" screen for a couple of
weeks now, since just before Testing went into freeze.
I've looked everywhere I can and tried all sorts of things, but
nothing solves the problem. I recently upgraded to sid to see if that
helped, but still no luck.
In the included
On Lu, 24 nov 14, 08:02:44, Marty wrote:
>
> It was a policy vote. The only "results" that matter are their effect
> on Debian Policy, right? The rest is academic.
>
> The vote invoked a clause in the TC init decision to allow modifying or
> overturning the policy set by the TC init decision, in
On Du, 23 nov 14, 15:11:56, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> That is expected. Because when you purged that package the tool
> doesn't know if you were going to install an alternative tool or a
> different version of that tool or something different. It shouldn't
> remove the dependencies recursively. Aga
Le Monday 24 November 2014 20:27:25, Ron Leach a écrit :
> List, good evening,
>
> I've looked through the man fetchmail pages and I'd like to get some
> extra logging but I can't seem to pass the -vv parameter to fetchmail.
> Fetchmail starts as a daemon, and I can stop it and start it again, b
List, good evening,
We use Fetchmail to collect email from various addresses and
providers. The incoming mail is passed to Exim for delivery to
mailboxes, and served to local MUAs on the network using IMAP provided
by Dovecot. We've had this architecture in place since Debian Etch
(D4) and
On 11/24/2014 1:14 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 08:18 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>> And while Wheezy will still be supported for a couple of years, it's not
>> necessarily the answer. While many people don't want the "latest and
>> greatest", they also don't want the "oldest and baddest".
On 11/24/2014 1:08 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 10:52 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On 25/11/14 01:57, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 8:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 11/24/2014 1:00 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 8:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will lose a
>> lot of
>> dedicated
On 11/24/2014 12:37 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 25/11/14 03:26, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 10:52 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On 25/11/14 01:57, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 8:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Fergu
On 11/24/2014 12:22 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 25/11/14 03:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 10:05 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On 25/11/14 00:25, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will
>
On 11/24/2014 08:18 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
And while Wheezy will still be supported for a couple of years, it's not
necessarily the answer. While many people don't want the "latest and
greatest", they also don't want the "oldest and baddest".
Sounds like your customers need to either pay fo
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 10:52 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 25/11/14 01:57, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 8:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will
lose a lot of d
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 8:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will lose a lot of
dedicated users due to this decision. Possibly another fork, or
possibly another distro.
On 25/11/14 03:36, Curt wrote:
> On 2014-11-24, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>
>>> Some of them came to Debian because it was one of the last holdouts.
>>
>> Is that a reference to a term used in a television show about the
>> fictitious "Wild West"? I can only apologise of my ignorance of "popular
>> c
Hi.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 07:33:04AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems dsndynamic.com bit the dust this weekend of the 23 of
> November. Is there an alternative of a free dsn server?
freedns.afraid.org works for me last several years. Requires a
registration, as always.
Reco
Hi.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:35:46PM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Pascal Hambourg writes:
>
> > Harry Putnam a écrit :
> >>
> >> My question is whether continuing to use the 486 versions of kernels
> >> has any down sides?
> >
> > The -486 kernel lacks support for multiprocessing/hyperthread
I attempting to do some heavily customized installs. It was
suggested I investigate
debootstrap. My initial attempts were only a partial success.
While searching for more information I came across multistrap
which appears more suitable for me.
The man pages and tutorials I've found so far demo
On 25/11/14 03:26, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 10:52 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 25/11/14 01:57, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 11/24/2014 8:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you expect customers to build
On 24/11/14 16:30, The Wanderer wrote:
I do not have links to specific messages, since I don't habitually work
with or enjoy browsing through Web archives of mailing lists, and since
I've never understood (or even understood how to make practical use of)
the "message links" - looking outwardly si
On 25/11/14 03:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 10:05 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 25/11/14 00:25, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will
> lose a lot of dedicated users due to this decis
Pascal Hambourg writes:
> Harry Putnam a écrit :
>>
>> My question is whether continuing to use the 486 versions of kernels
>> has any down sides?
>
> The -486 kernel lacks support for multiprocessing/hyperthreading and PAE
> (which is required for NX/XD bit).
I see in my latest `full-upgrade'
On 2014-11-24, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> Some of them came to Debian because it was one of the last holdouts.
>
> Is that a reference to a term used in a television show about the
> fictitious "Wild West"? I can only apologise of my ignorance of "popular
> culture" (long story - I haven't watched
On 11/24/2014 11:01 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 25/11/14 02:01, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 8:58 AM, Martin Read wrote:
>>> On 24/11/14 13:25, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
And exactly what is the "Debian way" to add custom (NOT customized
pre-packaged) software to the system?
>>>
>>>
On 11/24/2014 at 10:37 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 25/11/14 00:53, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 11/24/2014 at 02:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> It's illogical to upgrade and not expect change - even when
>>> electing (as Debian allows) to retain the same init system.
>>
>> It's illogical to
On 11/24/2014 10:52 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 25/11/14 01:57, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 8:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will
>> lose a lot of d
On 11/24/2014 10:05 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 25/11/14 00:25, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will lose a
lot of dedicated users due to this decision. Possibly another
fork, or possibly
On 25/11/14 02:01, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 8:58 AM, Martin Read wrote:
>> On 24/11/14 13:25, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> And exactly what is the "Debian way" to add custom (NOT customized
>>> pre-packaged) software to the system?
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the obvious things that go into
On 25/11/14 01:57, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 8:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will
> lose a lot of dedicated users due to this decision. Possibly
>
On 25/11/14 01:03, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 at 02:59 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:58:46PM -0800, Matt Ventura wrote:
>>
>>> I think the bug here IMO is that a system simply shouldn't *do*
>>> things in general without me telling it to. If I close the lid
Hello,
I have a strange problem with homedirs on NFS (Wheezy), using Gnome3
Classic. With "advanced settings" I configured the desktop so that users
can place icons on it.
The problem is that after ordening the icons and rebooting the machine,
the position of the icons is the old position again..
On 25/11/14 00:53, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 at 02:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 24/11/14 13:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/23/2014 8:42 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
>
Like what?? I first installed systemd back when it was
announced. I have yet to have a single problem
Am 2014-11-24 15:47, schrieb Patrick Wiseman:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Jonathan Dowland
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 06:01:45PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
2014/11/24 17:18 "Jonathan Dowland" :
> I guess your argument makes sense if you are talking about all
source
packages
> from the
On 25/11/14 00:25, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will lose a
>>> lot of dedicated users due to this decision. Possibly another
>>> fork, or possibly another distro. But Debian will lose users.
>>
>>
On 25/11/14 00:33, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems dsndynamic.com bit the dust this weekend of the 23 of November.
> Is there an alternative of a free dsn server?
>
> Hugo
>
>
noip.com is one of many - it's possible to use it with the debian
package "ddclient"
Do I use it? Yes.
Is
On 11/24/2014 8:58 AM, Martin Read wrote:
> On 24/11/14 13:25, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> And exactly what is the "Debian way" to add custom (NOT customized
>> pre-packaged) software to the system?
>
> As far as I can tell, the obvious things that go into the "Debian way"
> for installing custom soft
On 11/24/2014 8:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>
Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will lose a lot of
dedicated users due to this decision. Possibly another fork, or
possibly another distro. B
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:58:29AM +0100, mad wrote:
> mentioned, other Debian installations not on my home network, with the
> same configuration show as expected four clock sources. Even starting
> ntpd on the command line doesn't show any more data and ntpd is compiled
> without debugging. Proba
Paul Scott wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 07:40:42AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
It seems dsndynamic.com bit the dust this weekend of the 23 of November.
Is there an alternative of a free dsn server?
I meant dnsdynamic of course...
You give no description but f
On 24/11/2014 14:23, Ron Leach wrote:
First, If you are looking for (1) a free domain name with (2) the
capability to automatically update the dns record whenever the IP
address of a host changes, such as the dyndns free service previously
did, then I wonder if it may be possible to
1. use a f
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 06:01:45PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>> 2014/11/24 17:18 "Jonathan Dowland" :
>> > I guess your argument makes sense if you are talking about all source
>> packages
>> > from the systemd stable, including logind; it's
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 09:03:31AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> Personally, I suspect that the only reason "suspend on lid close" is
> thought of as a sensible default is because so many other (non-*nix)
> systems already do it, not because of anything inherent to the behavior
> or to lid-close the
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 07:38:34AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> It isn't just ideal. It's Debian policy to respect configuration
> changes on upgrade.
That isn't the case, I'm afraid. At least if you are referring to [1], this
section refers specifically to *configuration files*, in the context
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 06:01:45PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/11/24 17:18 "Jonathan Dowland" :
> > I guess your argument makes sense if you are talking about all source
> packages
> > from the systemd stable, including logind; it's unlikely Patrick's init
> system
> > was switched to systemd-as
On 24/11/2014 13:40, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
It seems dsndynamic.com bit the dust this weekend of the 23 of
November. Is there an alternative of a free dsn server?
Two ideas:
First, If you are looking for (1) a free domain name with (2) the
capability to automat
On 11/24/2014 at 02:59 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:58:46PM -0800, Matt Ventura wrote:
>
>> I think the bug here IMO is that a system simply shouldn't *do*
>> things in general without me telling it to. If I close the lid of
>> my laptop, unless I have told it to susp
- Mail original -
>
> > It could even be a power issue - lack of sufficient voltage can
> > have
> > all sorts of weird and counter-intuitive results. And
> > inconsistently
> > so.
> Gonna change the power supply & SATA cables.
> At the boot, the BIOS take ages to detect HDs now, that's
On 24/11/14 13:25, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
And exactly what is the "Debian way" to add custom (NOT customized
pre-packaged) software to the system?
As far as I can tell, the obvious things that go into the "Debian way"
for installing custom software are:
1) If your software isn't installed via
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will lose a lot of
dedicated users due to this decision. Possibly another fork, or
possibly another distro. But Debian will lose users.
1. At best that's pure speculation. W
On 11/24/2014 at 02:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 24/11/14 13:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>> On 11/23/2014 8:42 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
>>> Like what?? I first installed systemd back when it was announced.
>>> I have yet to have a single problem with it.
>>
>> What about all of those people wit
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> The other issue here is that if you've told your system how you want
> it to behave once, it would be ideal if you didn't have to tell it the
> same thing again.
It isn't just ideal. It's Debian policy to respect configuration
changes on upgrade.
--
John Hasler
jhas
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 07:40:42AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >It seems dsndynamic.com bit the dust this weekend of the 23 of November.
> >Is there an alternative of a free dsn server?
> >
>
> I meant dnsdynamic of course...
You give no description but fro
Matt Ventura writes:
> I think the bug here IMO is that a system simply shouldn't *do* things
> in general without me telling it to. If I close the lid of my laptop,
> unless I have told it to suspend when I do so, then it shouldn't
> suspend. I should be telling my machine to do the things I want
On 11/24/2014 2:56 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Yes, and while the Linux community continues, Debian will lose a lot of
>> dedicated users due to this decision. Possibly another fork, or
>> possibly another distro. But Debian will lose users.
>
> 1. At best that's pure speculation. With all due
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
It seems dsndynamic.com bit the dust this weekend of the 23 of November.
Is there an alternative of a free dsn server?
I meant dnsdynamic of course...
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
- Mail original -
> De: "Karl E. Jorgensen"
> À: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Envoyé: Lundi 24 Novembre 2014 13:23:13
> Objet: Re: EXT4-fr error, ext4_find_entry: reading directory...
>
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:17:29PM +0100, linuxmasterj...@free.fr
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
On 11/23/2014 11:25 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 11/23/2014 09:20 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 11/23/2014 8:42 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2014 12:17 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> That is the huge majority of Debian users.
Some will get a rude surprise when they upgrade and things don't
Hi,
It seems dsndynamic.com bit the dust this weekend of the 23 of November.
Is there an alternative of a free dsn server?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://li
On 11/24/2014 02:14 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le dimanche, 23 novembre 2014, 18.09:58 Marty a écrit :
Did I miss something?
Yes.
Option 1: init policy stands *won by default* [1]
Option 2: change init policy *LOST*
Option 3: ask nicely to follow init policy *lost*
Option 4: policy stan
Hi
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:17:29PM +0100, linuxmasterj...@free.fr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since a couple of days, I have a bunch of "EXT4-fr error device
> ... ext4_find_entry: reading directory" errors.
Sounds like stuff in the kernel log?
> For me, that's only a disk issue, I booted on a s
Hi,
Since a couple of days, I have a bunch of "EXT4-fr error device ...
ext4_find_entry: reading directory" errors.
For me, that's only a disk issue, I booted on a sysresccd and did a e2fsck.
Everything was OK. Then, I rebooted and I still had those errors. I bought
another hard drive and
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 09:17:09PM -0700, john.tiger wrote:
> Have followed both guided partitioning as well as trying manual partitions
> with efi boot as first partition. Install works fine but after completion
> does not boot (get ? folder image) - tried to boot into rescue mode but
> target
Thanks for the replies.
On 24/11/14 05:12, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> On 11/23/2014 12:23 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Briefly as it's been 40 degrees Celsius here and I've been outside
>> working all day (almost beer o'clock)
>>
>> On 23/11/14 18:27, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>>> On 11/22/2014 04:09 PM, Sco
On 24/11/14 11:36, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> ERROR: Pairing with device ea1f2a0800d76f91f9bc0d50d6620151d249e6a9
> failed with unhandled error code -3
That's a plist error.
What is the output of "idevicepair -d pair" (you may need to paste the
output to paste.debian.net and provide a link to it in you
Am 24.11.2014 um 06:13 schrieb Chen Wei:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 09:57:50PM +0100, mad wrote:
>> # ntpq -p
>> remote refidst t when poll reach delay offset jitter
>>
>> fritz.box X.Y.Z.A 3 u-
2014/11/24 17:18 "Jonathan Dowland" :
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:29:28PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> > I don't mind having yet another reason for telling the developers they
> > should have made the systemd based debian a parallel internal fork
> > with an independent release schedule.
> >
> > Bu
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 08:16:29AM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
systemd supports sysvinit init scripts (that have the LSB headers which
are already mandatory in wheezy) just fine. Not doing so would be a bug,
of course.
I have initscripts without LSB headers working just fine. There are
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:29:28PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> I don't mind having yet another reason for telling the developers they
> should have made the systemd based debian a parallel internal fork
> with an independent release schedule.
>
> But since they chose not to, this kind of bug is just
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:58:46PM -0800, Matt Ventura wrote:
> I think the bug here IMO is that a system simply shouldn't *do*
> things in general without me telling it to. If I close the lid of my
> laptop, unless I have told it to suspend when I do so, then it
> shouldn't suspend. I should be te
On 24/11/14 13:20, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 11/23/2014 8:42 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
>> On 11/23/2014 12:17 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> That is the huge majority of Debian users.
>>> Some will get a rude surprise when they upgrade and things don't work as
>>> expected.
Apropos of what? That "surpris
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:20:52PM -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> What about all of those people with custom software running which relies
> on sysv init for starting? There are a lot of those systems out there -
> and every one of them will need work to conform to systemd.
Some may well work with
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:20:42PM -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> This isn't only about patches to Debian packages. This is also about
> custom code many people have installed and set up to work with sysv
> init. These will fail with systemd,
These *might* fail with systemd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hello,
I have laptop with intel graphics chipset, and I would like to prevent it
from using framebuffer, while allow X intel driver.
I'm using wheezy+backports, kernel 3.16.5 (linux-image-3.16-0.bpo.3-686-pae)
When I disabled mode switching by kernel option i915.modeset=0 or nomodeset,
framebuf
82 matches
Mail list logo
