Re: Maildir ext4 slowness

2014-04-08 Thread Raffaele Morelli
2014-04-09 6:53 GMT+02:00 Stan Hoeppner : > > Mutt, as with other MUAs, creates a header cache so it only needs to > read the headers of new mail files. If you're slowing down with large > maildir folders, the most likely problem is that your header caching is > not working properly. > There a s

Re: Maildir ext4 slowness

2014-04-08 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 4/8/2014 9:47 PM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Debian User, > > Of late, I've observed that opening my Maildir boxes in Mutt has been > a tad slow. Here is the rough structure: > > I have an LVM home directory (ext4), within which I have a folder > called ~/Maildir. This folder has several Maild

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Carl Johnson
Tom Furie writes: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:32:37PM -0400, Brad Alexander wrote: > >> I apologize. I should have vetted these before posting them. Best as I can >> tell, ez-ip, penguinpowered, and hn seem to be gone, dhs, ods, easydns are >> no longer free, tzo got acquired by dyndns (thus und

Maildir ext4 slowness

2014-04-08 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Debian User, Of late, I've observed that opening my Maildir boxes in Mutt has been a tad slow. Here is the rough structure: I have an LVM home directory (ext4), within which I have a folder called ~/Maildir. This folder has several Maildirs, say inbox, debian-user etc., each of which gets it

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 00:54:10 +0200 Jochen Spieker wrote: > Hugo Vanwoerkom: > > > > DynDNS just announced that their free hostname program in 30 days > > will no longer be gratis. > > I use that with ddclient to update the IP address for my blog. > > Are there other free alternatives? > > I use

Re: where is libgtk2 (for Raspbian)?

2014-04-08 Thread Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:05:09PM -0400, ken wrote: > For the Debian/Raspberry Pi crowd here... > > A doc I'm following for the install of wxPython says to do > > gtk-config --version > > But it returns > > gtk-config: command not found > > sudo apt-file search gtk-config > > turns up nothin

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Tom Furie
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:32:37PM -0400, Brad Alexander wrote: > I apologize. I should have vetted these before posting them. Best as I can > tell, ez-ip, penguinpowered, and hn seem to be gone, dhs, ods, easydns are > no longer free, tzo got acquired by dyndns (thus under the 30 days left > clau

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Pascal Obry wrote: Le mardi 08 avril 2014 à 15:51 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom a écrit : DynDNS just announced that their free hostname program in 30 days will no longer be gratis. I use that with ddclient to update the IP address for my blog. Are there other free alternatives? Sure: http://www.noi

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Brad Alexander
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Brad Alexander wrote: > > Over lo these many years, I have run ez-ipupdate on my perimeter to keep > my dynamic hostname in sync. So I pulled up the description, which says: > > " Currently supported are: ez-ip (http://www.EZ-IP.Net/), Penguinpowered > (http://www

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Tom Furie
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:03:26PM -0400, Brad Alexander wrote: > Over lo these many years, I have run ez-ipupdate on my perimeter to keep my > dynamic hostname in sync. So I pulled up the description, which says: > > " Currently supported are: ez-ip (http://www.EZ-IP.Net/), Penguinpowered > (ht

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Pascal Obry wrote: Le mardi 08 avril 2014 à 15:51 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom a écrit : DynDNS just announced that their free hostname program in 30 days will no longer be gratis. I use that with ddclient to update the IP address for my blog. Are there other free alternatives? Sure: http://www.noi

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Brad Alexander
s On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Tom Furie wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:51:01PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > > > DynDNS just announced that their free hostname program in 30 days > > will no longer be gratis. > > I use that with ddclient to update the IP address for my blog. > > Are

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Jochen Spieker
Hugo Vanwoerkom: > > DynDNS just announced that their free hostname program in 30 days > will no longer be gratis. > I use that with ddclient to update the IP address for my blog. > Are there other free alternatives? I use with inadyn. J. -- The news at ten makes me

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Tom Furie
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 03:51:01PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > DynDNS just announced that their free hostname program in 30 days > will no longer be gratis. > I use that with ddclient to update the IP address for my blog. > Are there other free alternatives? This news disappointed me too, giv

Re: DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Pascal Obry
Le mardi 08 avril 2014 à 15:51 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom a écrit : > DynDNS just announced that their free hostname program in 30 days will > no longer be gratis. > I use that with ddclient to update the IP address for my blog. > Are there other free alternatives? Sure: http://www.noip.com and http

where is libgtk2 (for Raspbian)?

2014-04-08 Thread ken
For the Debian/Raspberry Pi crowd here... A doc I'm following for the install of wxPython says to do gtk-config --version But it returns gtk-config: command not found sudo apt-file search gtk-config turns up nothing relevant. Where to now? tia. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-req

DynDNS no longer free.

2014-04-08 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Hi, DynDNS just announced that their free hostname program in 30 days will no longer be gratis. I use that with ddclient to update the IP address for my blog. Are there other free alternatives? Hugo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Jochen Spieker
Gary Carter: > > Just curious - are you running Google's mod_spdy? If so, that was the > culprit for me - check: Yes, that was it. Thanks for the heads-up. J. -- The news at ten makes me peevish but animal hospital makes me cry. [Agree] [Disagree]

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Jochen Spieker
Sven Hartge: > Jochen Spieker wrote: > >> Yes, here it is: >> https://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/issues/detail?id=85 > >>| Note that just disabling the spdy module in Apache won't work, because >>| the SSL library itself is replaced. Easiest fix on Debian is to remove >>| the mod-spdy package fr

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Sven Hartge
Jochen Spieker wrote: > Thinking about this … what I actually use is mod_spdy which is not > linked against libssl. It probably has the same bug … > Yes, here it is: > https://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/issues/detail?id=85 > | Note that just disabling the spdy module in Apache won't work, becau

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Gary Carter
Hi guys, Sorry if I end up doing this wrong (don't tend to post to lists often), thread-wise, but I ran into the same issue where it seemed that despite upgrading OpenSSL to the patched version, my Apache server was still vulnerable to Heartbleed. Just curious - are you running Google's mod_spdy?

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Sven Hartge
Jochen Spieker wrote: > Thinking about this … what I actually use is mod_spdy which is not > linked against libssl. It probably has the same bug … > Yes, here it is: > https://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/issues/detail?id=85 > | Note that just disabling the spdy module in Apache won't work, becau

Re: XFCE upgrade wheezy->jessie feedback

2014-04-08 Thread Steven Rosenberg
I'd say file some bugs against the packages in Jessie. -- Steven Rosenberg http://stevenrosenberg.net/blog http://blogs.dailynews.com/click stevenhrosenb...@gmail.com ste...@stevenrosenberg.net On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Martin Read wrote: > Today, I upgraded my system from wheezy to jes

Re: openssl 101-g not in packages.gz

2014-04-08 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2014-04-08 20:49 +0200, Hans wrote: >> It should happen with the next mirror push. For some reason neither >> jessie nor sid have seen updates this afternoon yet, at least not on >> ftp.de.debian.org. >> >> Cheers, >>Sven > Hi Sven. > > This was exactly the server I was looking at. I

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Jochen Spieker
Sven Hartge: > Jochen Spieker wrote: > >> I have the most recent version and it still reports my system to be >> vulnerable. > > Are you sure you restarted the right system? (Just asking, had the same > problem today, was looking at a totally different system than the one I > thought I was looki

Re: openssl 101-g not in packages.gz

2014-04-08 Thread Erwan David
Le 08/04/2014 20:55, Erwan David a écrit : > Le 08/04/2014 20:49, Hans a écrit : >>> It should happen with the next mirror push. For some reason neither >>> jessie nor sid have seen updates this afternoon yet, at least not on >>> ftp.de.debian.org. >>> >>> Cheers, >>>Sven >> Hi Sven. >> >>

Re: openssl 101-g not in packages.gz

2014-04-08 Thread Erwan David
Le 08/04/2014 20:49, Hans a écrit : >> It should happen with the next mirror push. For some reason neither >> jessie nor sid have seen updates this afternoon yet, at least not on >> ftp.de.debian.org. >> >> Cheers, >>Sven > Hi Sven. > > This was exactly the server I was looking at. I just

Re: openssl 101-g not in packages.gz

2014-04-08 Thread Hans
> It should happen with the next mirror push. For some reason neither > jessie nor sid have seen updates this afternoon yet, at least not on > ftp.de.debian.org. > > Cheers, >Sven Hi Sven. This was exactly the server I was looking at. I just wondered, because someone told at heise.de f

Writing a VERY atypical preseed.cfg

2014-04-08 Thread Richard Owlett
I'm doing a series installs to define my "ideal" install. In any reasonable test procedure you change as few parameters as possible. THEREFORE I make heavy use of preseed.cfg files. I have come to the point that I wish to force manual intervention at *TWO* points: 1. choice of installation p

Re: openssl 101-g not in packages.gz

2014-04-08 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2014-04-08 20:25 +0200, Hans wrote: > Maybe I am wrong, but it looks like the fixed openssl 101-g is in the repo, > but > not in the packages.gz of debian/jessie. > > So (if I see this correct), debian/jessie will not see and update the newest > version. It should happen with the next mirro

openssl 101-g not in packages.gz

2014-04-08 Thread Hans
Hello, Maybe I am wrong, but it looks like the fixed openssl 101-g is in the repo, but not in the packages.gz of debian/jessie. So (if I see this correct), debian/jessie will not see and update the newest version. But maybe I am wrong and the error is here on my system, who knows. Kind regar

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Sven Hartge
Jochen Spieker wrote: >>> Am I doing anything wrong? Is the testing tool broken? I also tried the >>> one at https://gist.github.com/takeshixx/10107280 which confirms there >>> is still a problem on port 443 (HTTPS served by Apache). >> >> That test tool was updated a few hours ago to include ch

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Jochen Spieker
Scott Ferguson: > On 09/04/14 00:49, Jochen Spieker wrote: >> >> as many others, I patched my machines today because of the horrible >> OpenSSL bug: >> >> $ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0 >> libssl1.0.0: >> Installed: 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6 >> Candidate: 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6 >> Version table: >> 1.0

XFCE upgrade wheezy->jessie feedback

2014-04-08 Thread Martin Read
Today, I upgraded my system from wheezy to jessie (mostly because I wanted to install the steam client). This has had at least two issues so far: First, the XFCE panel at the bottom of my screen has materially increased its height (causing the bottom edges of my commonly used applications to

[SOLVED] Re: vesa mode code?

2014-04-08 Thread Hans
Am Mittwoch, 9. April 2014, 02:20:16 schrieb Scott Ferguson: > On 09/04/14 01:33, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Ma, 08 apr 14, 16:20:22, Hans wrote: > >> Is it possible (and if yes, how), to compute the code from the wanted > >> solution? For example, if I want to have 1440x900, can I compute the >

Re: vesa mode code?

2014-04-08 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 09/04/14 01:33, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 08 apr 14, 16:20:22, Hans wrote: >> >> Is it possible (and if yes, how), to compute the code from the wanted >> solution? For example, if I want to have 1440x900, can I compute the >> vga=whatever code? Or must I always look into a table? See:-

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Jochen Spieker
Reco: > Hi. > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > >> Am I doing anything wrong? Is the testing tool broken? I also tried the >> one at https://gist.github.com/takeshixx/10107280 which confirms there >> is still a problem on port 443 (HTTPS served by Apache). > > N

Re: vesa mode code?

2014-04-08 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 08 apr 14, 17:48:17, Hans wrote: > > No, I could not find an answer, if the number from the "vga=" can be computed > out of the wanted resolution. So, for example, 800x600x32 = 789h(ex) or > whatever. ... > Maybe my English is too bad, so my question is misunderstood. You question was w

Re: vesa mode code?

2014-04-08 Thread Hans
Hi Andrei, > GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX=1440x900 > I know this variable. It is from grub2, I know. Besides I am still using grub- legacy, my problem is not to find the correct vga= for my resolution. I know this one. No, I could not find an answer, if the number from the "vga=" can be computed

Re: Net install cd, Not a Bug Report!!

2014-04-08 Thread Lisi Reisz
Sorry, Miles. THis should have gone to teh list. On Sunday 06 April 2014 08:24:20 Miles Wade wrote: > I want to thank ya'll for how well the net installation CD image > works. It's great, isn't it? I can claim no credit. I just use it. But we certainly have wonderful developers. I have used

Re: vesa mode code?

2014-04-08 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 08 apr 14, 16:20:22, Hans wrote: > > Is it possible (and if yes, how), to compute the code from the wanted > solution? For example, if I want to have 1440x900, can I compute the > vga=whatever code? Or must I always look into a table? Not what you're asking for, but maybe what you need:

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 09/04/14 00:49, Jochen Spieker wrote: > Hi, > > as many others, I patched my machines today because of the horrible > OpenSSL bug: > > $ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0 > libssl1.0.0: > Installed: 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6 > Candidate: 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6 > Version table: > 1.0.1g-1 0 > -10

Re: vesa mode code?

2014-04-08 Thread Hans
> The video mode number of the Linux kernel is the VESA mode number plus > 0x200 > > No no, what I mean is the following: Guess, I want to have a special resolution at boot, for example 800x600x32. Now I need the vga=whatever. To get it, I can look into a list and see, yes, it is vga=789. Th

Re: vesa mode code?

2014-04-08 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 09/04/14 00:20, Hans wrote: > Hi there, > > I am asking myself now for many years, if there is a relationship between the > solution and the vesacode at the grub commandline. Do you mean if you type "c" at the GRUB prompt and then vbeinfo? Those are the frame buffer modes your screen can hand

Re: OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Reco
Hi. On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > Am I doing anything wrong? Is the testing tool broken? I also tried the > one at https://gist.github.com/takeshixx/10107280 which confirms there > is still a problem on port 443 (HTTPS served by Apache). No, chances are, you'r

Re: vesa mode code?

2014-04-08 Thread Reco
Hi. On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Hans wrote: > Hi there, > > I am asking myself now for many years, if there is a relationship between the > solution and the vesacode at the grub commandline. > > Of course, there is a table everywhere, where I can see, which resolution is > at the

OpenSSL Heartbleed bug, Apache still vulnerable?

2014-04-08 Thread Jochen Spieker
Hi, as many others, I patched my machines today because of the horrible OpenSSL bug: $ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0 libssl1.0.0: Installed: 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6 Candidate: 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6 Version table: 1.0.1g-1 0 -10 http://http.debian.net/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages *** 1.0.1

vesa mode code?

2014-04-08 Thread Hans
Hi there, I am asking myself now for many years, if there is a relationship between the solution and the vesacode at the grub commandline. Of course, there is a table everywhere, where I can see, which resolution is at the givenm mode (i.e. vga=791 is 1024x768). But what does 791 mean? I guess

Re: Software RAID10 - which two disks can fail?

2014-04-08 Thread Gary Dale
On 08/04/14 08:54 AM, Valerio Vanni wrote: "Gary Dale" ha scritto nel messaggio news:53437300.8020...@velcom.ca IMHO this is a bad setup. Because you are reading and writing to multiple disks at at time, you may have some speed-up, but you only get half the total space. And you are vulnerable

Re: Software RAID10 - which two disks can fail?

2014-04-08 Thread Valerio Vanni
"Gary Dale" ha scritto nel messaggio news:53437300.8020...@velcom.ca > IMHO this is a bad setup. Because you are reading and writing to > multiple disks at at time, you may have some speed-up, but you only > get half the total space. And you are vulnerable to some two-disk > failures. If you went

Re: Software RAID10 - which two disks can fail?

2014-04-08 Thread bruno.debian
On 08/04/2014 05:54, Gary Dale wrote: On 07/04/14 03:48 PM, Rafał Radecki wrote: Hi All. I have a server which uses RAID10 made of 4 partitions for / and boots from it. It looks like so: mdadm -D /dev/md1 /dev/md1: Version : 00.90 Creation Time : Mon Apr 27 09:25:05 2009 Raid Level : raid10 Ar

Re: mbox files - can they be "compacted"?

2014-04-08 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 02:10:09PM +0200, Rafał Radecki wrote: > Is there an option to compact large mbox files from the shell? I did not > find anything in google, I have some very large constantly updated mbox > files and would like to know if they can be made smaller with any tool. > AFAIK mutt

ZyXEL NWD2205 as a soft access point on Debian?

2014-04-08 Thread Csanyi Pal
Hi, have someone on this list setup of this USB WiFi adapter to uses as a soft Access Point with hostapd? http://www.zyxel.com/products_services/nwd2205.shtml?t=p -- Regards from Pal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C