Hi, check if your method is similar as this tutorial.
http://www.oneopensource.it/10/08/2011/ubuntu-debian-installare-in-automatico-aggiornamenti-di-sicurezza/
Tell abour your next progress.
Carlo.
2013/10/27 Florian Lindner :
> Hello,
>
> on Debian Wheezy I try to use the included unattended up
Reco writes:
> Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Reco wrote:
>> >>> Considering that primary usage of sudo is to provide controlled
>> >>> privilege escalation to uid=0, using unsupported (therefore - not
>> >>> updated unless local sysadmins care about security) sudo on these OS
Earlier youtube had muted sound on its videos. I found that out as a
result of reading some other blindness-related e-mail lists and I wrote
about it earlier on this list. So, did you unmute the video? You need
to do this with each video you visit. If you did that and are still
having these
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:55:44 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> Well, one thing leads to another. I started using Epiphany instead of
> iceweasel
> recently due to the sluggish performance of iceweasel. Now I have a different
> problem. Using Epiphany, I visited the YouTube site and played
Reco wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Most of those systems ship very little by their vendors. I have used
> > them for many years and almost all of the software that you will use
> > on those systems will have been compiled and installed by the local
> > admin. IMNHO they are mainly a good solid b
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 10/27/2013 5:02 PM, David Guntner wrote:
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
[tl;dr]
Can you guys PLEASE take this off-topic discussion somewhere else?
Like, maybe, the off-topic list (which, oddly enough, was created for
topics like this)
-
Jerry Stuckle grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On 10/27/2013 5:02 PM, David Guntner wrote:
>> Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>>
>> [tl;dr]
>>
>> Can you guys PLEASE take this off-topic discussion somewhere else?
>> Like, maybe, the off-topic list (which, oddly enough, was created for
>
On 10/27/2013 6:55 PM, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:51:48 -0400
Miles Fidelman wrote:
No, most business would NOT hire them as programmers - they couldn't
afford them.
From an outside layman (but very interested) perspective the argument
boils down to which is more important
On 10/27/2013 5:02 PM, David Guntner wrote:
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
[tl;dr]
Can you guys PLEASE take this off-topic discussion somewhere else?
Like, maybe, the off-topic list (which, oddly enough, was created for
topics like this)
--Dave
Dave,
Don't
On 10/27/2013 4:51 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
And also not to weigh in (much) about what's actually important about
OOP (Alan Kay has more than once pointed out that it's message passing
and isolation that
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Slavko wrote:
> I am sorry, perhaps i forgot to mention, that this is my setting. Or,
> to be more precise, i have shortcut to run "aptitude -R".
Thanks all for the replies so far, but still a bit confused.
I've always had a 06norecommends in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/
Sven Joachim writes:
[...]
>
> You have to edit the line starting with "linux", putting parameters
> after /vmlinuz-$version .
Finding that line was the problem...
I found /boot/grub.cfg and the kernel line there
> You could boot with the nomodeset kernel parameter, which should
> give you the
On 10/28/13, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness writes:
>
>> Can anyone tell me where my email went - see below - ??
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Zenaan Harkness
>> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
>> Subject: Re: What's the easiest and/or simplest part of Lin
On 10/28/13, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> 31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
>> Is this thread that old or was it sent with a wrong date? Have you
>> searched the archive? I guess the list's admin can't help.
>>
> The original posting was on Aug. 24 (just checked the archives).
Thank y
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:51:48 -0400
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> No, most business would NOT hire them as programmers - they couldn't
> afford them.
From an outside layman (but very interested) perspective the argument
boils down to which is more important, the use of or the
invention of
I conte
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 05:57:04PM -0400, ken wrote:
> One laptop I'm looking at buying offers these CPU options:
>
> * 4 Generation Intel® Core™ i7-4700MQ Processor ( 2.4 GHz 6MB L3
> Cache - 4 Cores plus Hyperthreading )
>
> * 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7-4800MQ Processor ( 2.7 GHz 6MB L3
> C
One laptop I'm looking at buying offers these CPU options:
* 4 Generation Intel® Core™ i7-4700MQ Processor ( 2.4 GHz 6MB L3 Cache -
4 Cores plus Hyperthreading )
* 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7-4800MQ Processor ( 2.7 GHz 6MB L3 Cache
- 4 Cores plus Hyperthreading )
* 4th Generation Intel®
Miles Fidelman grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
[tl;dr]
Can you guys PLEASE take this off-topic discussion somewhere else?
Like, maybe, the off-topic list (which, oddly enough, was created for
topics like this)
--Dave
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
And also not to weigh in (much) about what's actually important about
OOP (Alan Kay has more than once pointed out that it's message passing
and isolation that are important, polymorphism and inheritance a
Dearest sister
Greetings,
I hope in the lord that you, your family and ministry work
going will dear brother i wrote to you about my younger sister they are very
poor please courage them i shall be very thankful to you. This spurt not only
permanent
only this month they need,
looking for your grea
On 2013-10-27 19:41, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
Zenaan Harkness writes:
Can anyone tell me where my email went - see below - ??
-- Forwarded message --
From: Zenaan Harkness
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
Subject: Re: What's the easiest and/or simplest part of Linux
Kernel
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
Is this thread that old or was it sent with a wrong date? Have you
searched the archive? I guess the list's admin can't help.
The original posting was on Aug. 24 (just checked the archives).
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference
On 10/27/2013 1:18 PM, Martin T wrote:
> lspci utility shows information regarding devices on various buses like PCI
> or PCI Express. For example on IBM ThinkPad T42 laptop:
[snip]
> Am I correct that lspci uses SMBus which is present both on PCI and PCI
> Express? In addition, how are the model
Zenaan Harkness writes:
> Can anyone tell me where my email went - see below - ??
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Zenaan Harkness
> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
> Subject: Re: What's the easiest and/or simplest part of Linux Kernel?
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Hi,
lspci utility shows information regarding devices on various buses like PCI
or PCI Express. For example on IBM ThinkPad T42 laptop:
T42 ~ # lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82855PM Processor to I/O Controller
(rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82855PM Processor to AGP
> 31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
Is this thread that old or was it sent with a wrong date? Have you
searched the archive? I guess the list's admin can't help.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 23:46 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I looked around l.d.o/debian-user, but cannot find an admin address
> (sorry, I bit stupid sometimes).
>
> Can anyone tell me where my email went - see below - ??
>
> TIA
> Zenaan
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:38:03PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> [Please don't top post on this list]
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 03:54:22PM -0400, Dale Harris wrote:
> > I had to install vim-nox (or one of the other variants), to get python
> > support. Might be nice if vim-python-jedi require
On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
And also not to weigh in (much) about what's actually important about
OOP (Alan Kay has more than once pointed out that it's message passing
and isolation that are important, polymorphism and inheritance are just
what seem to g
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
And also not to weigh in (much) about what's actually important about
OOP (Alan Kay has more than once pointed out that it's message passing
and isolation that are important, polymorphism and inheritance are just
what seem to get the attention.) By the way: really nice dis
Hi,
Dňa Sun, 27 Oct 2013 22:47:00 +1300 Chris Bannister
napísal:
> > There are three types of dependencies:
> >
> > + depended = required
> > + recommended = optional
>
> Unless you explicitly set recommended to optional, then they are
> automatically installed.
I am sorry, perhaps i forgot t
Hello,
on Debian Wheezy I try to use the included unattended upgrades script for
security updates:
root@astarte ~ # cat /etc/apt/apt.conf
APT::Install-Recommends "0";
APT::Install-Suggests "0";
APT::Periodic::Update-Package-Lists "1";
APT::Periodic::Verbose "2";
APT::Periodic::Unattended-Upgrad
On 10/27/2013 6:54 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Not in any way disputing your basic premise that it's hard, or
impossible, to do polymorphism and inheritance in C, with which I
agree.
And not to weigh in on whether an "object" is a "machine" or vice versa
(though a pretty good arguement can be
I looked around l.d.o/debian-user, but cannot find an admin address
(sorry, I bit stupid sometimes).
Can anyone tell me where my email went - see below - ??
TIA
Zenaan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Zenaan Harkness
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:56:13 +1000
Subject: Re: What's the e
On Sunday 27 October 2013 03:17 PM, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:42:18AM +0100, Slavko wrote:
>> Ahoj,
>>
>> Dňa Sat, 26 Oct 2013 20:55:57 -0600 ruckusrogue
>> napísal:
>>
>>> Anyone know the proper tool (shell) to best remove (purge) packages
>>> and their dependencies afte
Not in any way disputing your basic premise that it's hard, or
impossible, to do polymorphism and inheritance in C, with which I agree.
And not to weigh in on whether an "object" is a "machine" or vice versa
(though a pretty good arguement can be made that objects can be viewed
as finite s
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:42:18AM +0100, Slavko wrote:
> Ahoj,
>
> Dňa Sat, 26 Oct 2013 20:55:57 -0600 ruckusrogue
> napísal:
>
> > Anyone know the proper tool (shell) to best remove (purge) packages
> > and their dependencies after installing?
>
> There are three types of dependencies:
>
> +
Thanks for the update.
I'd do it this way:
Download the needed package(s).
Disable Display Manager from starting on boot.
Reboot into 3.2 kernel.
Actually this is what doesn't work for me : even in console, once
the 3.2 kernel is loaded I haven’t got access to the keyboard
anymore.
I had
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 26 Oct 2013 20:55:57 -0600 ruckusrogue
napísal:
> Anyone know the proper tool (shell) to best remove (purge) packages
> and their dependencies after installing?
There are three types of dependencies:
+ depended = required
+ recommended = optional
+ suggested = optional
While th
Hi.
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:25:15 +0400
Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
> Sysctl is used in order to give kernel some default parameters to work.
> The most common cases to use it:
> - to allow packets redirection
> - to enable/disable ipv6 support
> - to change console behavior and printk output.
> ..and
Hi.
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 21:50:23 +
Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Reco wrote:
>
>
> > Yes, but pfexec is not sudo. And privilege-aware Solaris shells are
> > definitely not sudo too.
>
> It might not be sudo but it's the same principle of privilege escalation.
>
> sudo
Roland RoLaNd writes:
> that's the thing, i'm reading up on sysctl and don't have the
> necessary knowledge to know what to "expect" at the moment.
You have to know what you will get in the end. In my opinion it is
strongly recommended. You could begin with something easier, for
example, configu
Roland RoLaNd writes:
> All,
> I'm reading up on how to harden debian.i just checked /etc/sysctl.conf
> and noticed that everything is commented out.do that mean they're
> running as defaults or none of what exists in this file is
> implemented?
All of options in default configuration files *are
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 02:58:39 +0100
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 26.10.2013 13:37, Reco a écrit :
> > You don't need w3c validator if you have browser compatibility list.
> > This is the way this industry work - you don't have browser they like
> > - you don't use their product.
44 matches
Mail list logo
