Re: apt-pining: no priority (or zero) specified for pining

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Rob Owens wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:02:12PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: >> >> Well, the error message in title is not the exact one, but a >> translation of the one I have (which is exactly "W : Aucune priorité >> (ou zéro) n'a été spécifi

Re: apt-pining: no priority (or zero) specified for pining

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:02:12PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > Well, the error message in title is not the exact one, but a > translation of the one I have (which is exactly "W : Aucune priorité > (ou zéro) n'a été spécifiée pour l'épinglage" but it is in french > so...). > > The

Re: apt-pining: no priority (or zero) specified for pining

When pining for packages, pinning them is apt; I do agree :) (Sorry can't help with your technical question) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNS

Re: Debian 7

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:36:25AM -0800, rodrigo tavares wrote: > Hello, > > When Debian 7 is stable ? > > I read this version have packages more recent. > > I want install mail server. > > Is anybody installing the debian version 7 ? > > Atenciosamente, > > Rodrigo Faria Tavares > I think

Re: Debian 7

Hi, In article <51268e5d.8030...@rail.eu.org>, Erwan David wrote: > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/13/02/21/1335255/debian-project-releases-70-wheezy-candidate > > Ça arrive. That's just the RC of the installer isn't it? The rest of the distro is still frozen I understand. I'm beginn

Re: Debian 7

Le 21/02/2013 20:36, rodrigo tavares a écrit : Hello, When Debian 7 is stable ? I read this version have packages more recent. I want install mail server. Is anybody installing the debian version 7 ? Atenciosamente, Rodrigo Faria Tavares http://linux.slashdot.org/story/13/02/21/1335255/debia

Re: Debian 7

About.me http://about.me/dick.thomas Blog: www.xpd259.co.uk G+: www.google.com/profiles/xpd259 gpg key: C791809B On 21 February 2013 20:42, Thore wrote: > Hi, > I use wheezy on my Servers. > If you have no poeple who needs the server every time (like in business). > Than you can use wheezy. >

Re: Debian 7

Hi, I use wheezy on my Servers. If you have no poeple who needs the server every time (like in business). Than you can use wheezy. The mailserver would run on Squeeze too, but I have no bigger problems with the System (1/2 yeahr 1 bigger error coused by munin) I use wheezy, because of Xen. If

apt-pining: no priority (or zero) specified for pining

Well, the error message in title is not the exact one, but a translation of the one I have (which is exactly "W : Aucune priorité (ou zéro) n'a été spécifiée pour l'épinglage" but it is in french so...). The consequence is that it seems my preferences is not used, testing packages have lower p

Re: Debian 7

Le 21.02.2013 20:36, rodrigo tavares a écrit : Hello, When Debian 7 is stable ? I read this version have packages more recent. I want install mail server. Is anybody installing the debian version 7 ? Atenciosamente, Rodrigo Faria Tavares Packages are far more recent than on Debian 6, yes.

Debian 7

Hello, When Debian 7 is stable ? I read this version have packages more recent. I want install mail server. Is anybody installing the debian version 7 ? Atenciosamente, Rodrigo Faria Tavares

Re: Can't execute binary?

Hi, Dňa Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:40:53 + Tony van der Hoff napísal: > The permissions are identical to those on my squeeze setup: > tony@tony-dlt:~$ ls -l /usr/local/firefox/firefox* > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root staff 99408 Feb 1 16:33 /usr/local/firefox/firefox Can you check, that the mount has not the

Re: Keeping backups until storage runs short (deja-dup style) with command line tools?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:46:43PM +0300, Johannes Graumann wrote: > Hi, > > deja-dup has an option to keep backups forever or until storage on the drive > backed up to runs short (at which point it starts deleting old backups). > Does someone have any pointers on how to copy that behavior using

Re: Can't execute binary?

On 21/02/13 11:39, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote: >> Hi, >> I've just installed wheezy/KDE on a spare machine, to see what we're >> getting. All seems OK, apart from one mystery: >> >> I installed a copy of Firefox-18.0.2 in /usr/local, with a symlink >> pointing to it, as I have done in Squeeze

Re: window stickyness and focus

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:19:45AM -0500, shawn wilson wrote: > I have two problems here but I think they're somewhat related: > > First, I have vim as an alias to a shell script that basically does: > vim --servername $USER --remote-tab $1 > and I generally run gvim --servername $USER > which mea

Re: Can't execute binary?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:23:44AM +, Tony van der Hoff wrote: tony@tony-dlt:~$ /usr/local/firefox/firefox bash: /usr/local/firefox/firefox: cannot execute binary file Was sagt „ldd /usr/local/firefox/firefox”, „ls -l /usr/local/firefox/firefox” und „file /usr/local/firefox/firefox”? Sha

Keeping backups until storage runs short (deja-dup style) with command line tools?

Hi, deja-dup has an option to keep backups forever or until storage on the drive backed up to runs short (at which point it starts deleting old backups). Does someone have any pointers on how to copy that behavior using duplicity and/or other CLI tools? Cheers, Joh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Can't execute binary?

Dear Tony, Tony van der Hoff wrote: > tony@tony-dlt:~$ /usr/local/firefox/firefox > bash: /usr/local/firefox/firefox: cannot execute binary file > > Well, WTF, as they say. Does anyone know of a change that causes this? A little bit more verbosity might help: $ mount $ file /usr/local/firefox/fi

Re: Can't execute binary?

On 21/02/13 11:30, Thierry Chatelet wrote: > The Thursday 21 February 2013 12:23:44, Tony van der Hoff wrote : >> Hi, >> I've just installed wheezy/KDE on a spare machine, to see what we're >> getting. All seems OK, apart from one mystery: >> >> I installed a copy of Firefox-18.0.2 in /usr/local, w

Re: Can't execute binary?

> Hi, > I've just installed wheezy/KDE on a spare machine, to see what we're > getting. All seems OK, apart from one mystery: > > I installed a copy of Firefox-18.0.2 in /usr/local, with a symlink > pointing to it, as I have done in Squeeze and earlier for years. > > Typing "/usr/local/firefox/fire

Re: LXDE startup

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 08:11:07PM +, Sharon Kimble wrote: >My LXDE startup at �/etc/xdg/lxsession/LXDE/autostart >has this in it '@termit -e ncmpcpp' which starts ncmpcpp, a MPD >backend. Termit is a rather nice terminal with tabs that auto-resizes >to the name you enter into i

Re: Can't execute binary?

The Thursday 21 February 2013 12:23:44, Tony van der Hoff wrote : > Hi, > I've just installed wheezy/KDE on a spare machine, to see what we're > getting. All seems OK, apart from one mystery: > > I installed a copy of Firefox-18.0.2 in /usr/local, with a symlink > pointing to it, as I have done in

Can't execute binary?

Hi, I've just installed wheezy/KDE on a spare machine, to see what we're getting. All seems OK, apart from one mystery: I installed a copy of Firefox-18.0.2 in /usr/local, with a symlink pointing to it, as I have done in Squeeze and earlier for years. Typing "/usr/local/firefox/firefox" always us

Re: Open new session with same user (in GDM)

Le Jeu 21 février 2013 7:29, Alois Mahdal a écrit : > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:55:06 -0600 > "Mark Allums" wrote: > > >>> Le 21/02/2013 00:32, Mark Allums a écrit : >>> > From: Kent West [mailto:we...@acu.edu] > On 02/20/2013 04:07 PM, Alois Mahdal wrote: > >> Hello to all! >> >>

RE: Boot and shutdown routines frequently abort in Squeeze

Hi, >> Ouch! Have you ruled out hardware? Have you tried booting from a >> live-cd, knoppix, grml, something like that? > > Actually no, I have not ruled out hardware failure. In fact there are other > unusual problems > which may indicate a hardware failure. I did run the smartctl long self