Hi all
i just want to setup debian webserver with Nginx
i installed and i am getting "*Welcome to nginx*!" page but i am
not getting other pages which is in the www directory like "info.php" so
could u please sent me the *How To Install A Complete LEMP (Linux -
EngineX (Nginx HTTP SERVER) - Mysq
Sorry for the confusing, I am not providing a proxy.
What I meant was, WPAD with IE works great when laptop user moves
between proxied company environment and home. With auto discovery
option on, IE does not have to change anything, if there is a proxy,
use it. If not, directly access.
So I am thin
Chris Davies writes:
>Cam Hutchison wrote:
>> BK_LIST=()
>> Append to the array with +=
>> BK_LIST+="${PARAM}"
>This += syntax appears not to work with my version of bash
>("4.1.5(1)-release" from package bash 4.1-3). Instead I have
>to do this:
> BK_LIST+=("${PARAM}")
>Was yours a typo, o
2012-04-25 06:36, Dan Hitt skrev:
I'm running debian 6.0.4 (squeeze).
I'm attempting to change my window manager from the default metacity
to wmaker (WindowMaker).
I attempted the change by
sudo update-alternatives --display x-window-manager
and then choosing the wmaker alternative.
I t
I'm running debian 6.0.4 (squeeze).
I'm attempting to change my window manager from the default metacity
to wmaker (WindowMaker).
I attempted the change by
sudo update-alternatives --display x-window-manager
and then choosing the wmaker alternative.
When i run
update-alternatives --display
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:46:22 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
OK already -- I've written both UNread manuals and MISread test
procedures ;/
What am I using - I'm not sure:
1. the *HAND written* label on CD I used to load
identified it as
DEBIAN 6.0.3 with GNOME desktop
On 25/04/12 08:02, Gary Dale wrote:
> 1440 x 900 is a standard 16:9 ratio
Sorry, that just jumps out at me, and I can't ignore it :-)
1600 x 900 is 16:9; 1440 x 900 is clearly 14.4:9, or 16:10.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 02:40:08AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:18 -0400, Rob wrote in message
> <20120424223418.ga5...@aurora.owens.net>:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > I need to get two monitors running on two separate video card
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:18 -0400, Rob wrote in message
<20120424223418.ga5...@aurora.owens.net>:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards on a
> > Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf, or is t
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:02:56 -0400, Gary wrote in message
<4f9706f0.3000...@rogers.com>:
> On 24/04/12 01:39 PM, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> > When I replaced my desktop with a new computer, I kept my TFT
> > screen. It has the non-standard size of 1440x900.
> >
> > Recently, I have been wondering
On 24/04/12 22:10, Ellwood Blues wrote:
If you want to be happy and trouble-free, try to avoid «Advanced
Format» disks. I have 2TB disks and 1.5TB too that work perfectly but
I've made the mistake to buy a 3TB WD Caviar Green («Advanced Format»)
which I can only use on Windows as a 3TB disk, Linu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:05:15PM +0530, J. Bakshi wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:14:35 +0100
> Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:12:50PM +0530, J. Bakshi wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear list,
> > >
> > > I have tested my webcam with guvcviwe and the cam is running fine.
> > > Now
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards on a
> Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf, or is there a
> simple gui tool to do this nowadays?
>
Wow, I got it working already. All I did was:
/etc/init.
HI Jon,
I've been using truecrypt (available for windows, mac and linux) for a
while without problems. It works as a file inside a partiiton on any
available system (lvm or not) and can be installed even using fat or
other basic filesystems.
The solutions uses a graphical interface, and can be sc
I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards on a
Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf, or is there a
simple gui tool to do this nowadays?
Thanks
-Rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Hello,
I have a serious problem with external usb hard drives and a new
debian squeeze on a laptop.
The symptoms are
What it works:
- When I mount a previously an usb hard drive formatted using another
computer (linux or windows) the first time it mounts well, either by
command line as root or u
Hi,
I am interested in creating an encrypted partition (ideally
LVM logical volume) on an external disk, which I will want
to attach and detach from my laptop whilst running. I use
the GNOME3 environment and am looking for a robust solution
which doesn't require too much fuss.
It would appear th
If you want to be happy and trouble-free, try to avoid «Advanced
Format» disks. I have 2TB disks and 1.5TB too that work perfectly but
I've made the mistake to buy a 3TB WD Caviar Green («Advanced Format»)
which I can only use on Windows as a 3TB disk, Linux only detects
about 780MB if I remember w
On 24/04/12 01:39 PM, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
When I replaced my desktop with a new computer, I kept my TFT screen.
It has the non-standard size of 1440x900.
Recently, I have been wondering if it would be better for me to have
1600x1200 screen. Would this be better for Linux software? What abo
On 24 April 2012 10:39, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> When I replaced my desktop with a new computer, I kept my TFT screen. It has
> the non-standard size of 1440x900.
>
> Recently, I have been wondering if it would be better for me to have
> 1600x1200 screen. Would this be better for Linux software?
The extra vertical resolution could come in handy, although because of the
aspect ratio (its much more of a square than the one you've got now) some
of it wouldn't be useful when watching widescreen movies.
Think about the aspect ratio as one of the most important factors when
choosing a screen.
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2012 schrieb Sian Mountbatten:
> When I replaced my desktop with a new computer, I kept my TFT screen. It
> has the non-standard size of 1440x900.
>
> Recently, I have been wondering if it would be better for me to have
> 1600x1200 screen. Would this be better for Linux soft
When I replaced my desktop with a new computer, I kept my TFT screen. It
has the non-standard size of 1440x900.
Recently, I have been wondering if it would be better for me to have
1600x1200 screen. Would this be better for Linux software? What about HD
TV? And movies?
Any comments welcome
-
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:45:34PM +0100, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> Last night, I split two film files into 4 GB pieces and used Brasero
> to write the pieces to 4 DVD+RW discs. So that's another, safe, way
> of backing up my data. I am now going to write my 4.3 GB music
> collection to another DVD
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:19:11 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-04-24 15:48:38 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:06:27 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> > You assume that there is just a user Apache configuration for each
>> > virtual host. This is not the case. If a site decide
I'm trying to install Debian Squeeze from the netboot image [1] over PXE
and having great difficulty getting it to detect the drives. The error
is that no drives are detected:
"No disk drive was detected. If you know the name of
the driver needed by your disk drive, you can select
On 2012-04-24 15:48:38 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:06:27 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > You assume that there is just a user Apache configuration for each
> > virtual host. This is not the case. If a site decides to make script
> > contents available (as text), but then a glo
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:06:27 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-04-23 15:06:44 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:51:58 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>
>> > On 2012-04-20 14:37:11 +, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> >> The user is the admin of his/her site and so the ultimate respos
On 2012-04-23 15:06:44 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:51:58 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > On 2012-04-20 14:37:11 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> The user is the admin of his/her site and so the ultimate resposible
> >> for his/her site security.
> >
> > What do you mean by s
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:45:34 +0100, Sian Mountbatten wrote:
> On 24/04/12 14:30, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:20:05 +0200, Alberto Fuentes wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/04/12 19:34, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Yes, and I'm against partitioning too much but considering the big
>> sizes of the actual h
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:10:52 +0900, Han Soo Chang wrote:
> Hi, I recently installed debain squeeze on Hewlet Packard Pavillion
> h8-1280jp, which has a ATI Radeon HD 7450 graphic card. However, the
> resolution of the monitor is limited to 1280 x 1024, and I cannot get
> any higher resolution.
(.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:10:52 +0900, Han Soo Chang wrote:
> Hi, I recently installed debain squeeze on Hewlet Packard Pavillion
> h8-1280jp, which has a ATI Radeon HD 7450 graphic card. However, the
> resolution of the monitor is limited to 1280 x 1024, and I cannot get
> any higher resolution.
(.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:10:52 +0900, Han Soo Chang wrote:
> Hi, I recently installed debain squeeze on Hewlet Packard Pavillion
> h8-1280jp, which has a ATI Radeon HD 7450 graphic card. However, the
> resolution of the monitor is limited to 1280 x 1024, and I cannot get
> any higher resolution.
(.
On 24/04/12 14:30, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:20:05 +0200, Alberto Fuentes wrote:
On 21/04/12 19:34, Camaleón wrote:
Yes, and I'm against partitioning too much but considering the big sizes
of the actual hard disks it has become a must, also to minimize a
filesystem corruption in
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:59:57 -0700, Bill Harris wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:48:01 -0700, Bill Harris wrote:
>>> 1. I set up Evolution and imported my Icedove folders, and then I
>>> downloaded email for the first time in Evolution. That gave me
>>> duplicates
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:20:05 +0200, Alberto Fuentes wrote:
> On 21/04/12 19:34, Camaleón wrote:
>> I'm against big partitions (500 GiB is the limit I have auto-imposed to
>> my systems) so I would make 4 slices and spread the data over them.
>> Anyway, I don't think you are going to have any probl
Am 24.04.2012 um 13:58 schrieb Denny Schierz:
> hi,
>
> I have problems to get debootstrap squeeze /path/to/nfs4_solaris/share. It
> extracting several archives and than you get a prompt, without any messages.
>
> [...]
> I: Extracting libtext-wrapi18n-perl...
> I: Extracting mawk...
> I: Ext
Darac Marjal wrote:
> You can use your DHCP server to explicitly tell clients where to look.
Do any real-world applications or systems actually use the DHCP
setting?
I'm not aware of any that do so, but my information could be wildly out
of date. OTOH wpad has been long since deprecated but IME
hi,
I have problems to get debootstrap squeeze /path/to/nfs4_solaris/share. It
extracting several archives and than you get a prompt, without any messages.
[...]
I: Extracting libtext-wrapi18n-perl...
I: Extracting mawk...
I: Extracting libncurses5...
I: Extracting ncurses-base...
I: Extracting
On 21/04/12 19:34, Camaleón wrote:
I'm against big partitions (500 GiB is the limit I have auto-imposed to
my systems) so I would make 4 slices and spread the data over them.
Anyway, I don't think you are going to have any problem to manage a
single partition of 2 TiB, even more if you plain to s
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:13:43AM +0800, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
> Hi,
> The subject is confusing. By auto-proxy, I meant something like the
> auto-discovery of IE. With this option on, if there was a proxy
> broadcast in the network, then used it. If not, then just direct
> connection.
>
On 24/04/2012 04:02, Philipp Schneider wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:50:02 +0200, tv.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, I use seagate's ST2000DL003-9VT1 (it's some kind of "eco" drive, but
still fast) for that purpose, in raid1. No complains. I have had
disastrous experiences with WD 2TB drives (
Cam Hutchison wrote:
> BK_LIST=()
> Append to the array with +=
> BK_LIST+="${PARAM}"
This += syntax appears not to work with my version of bash
("4.1.5(1)-release" from package bash 4.1-3). Instead I have
to do this:
BK_LIST+=("${PARAM}")
Was yours a typo, or is it something that now works
43 matches
Mail list logo
