On Sunday 22 December 2002 10:01, Dominique wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed debian on my PC. There was no reiserfs by default so I added
> one (latest I could find). And severe problems began:
Sounds strange. If you use the bf2.4 install image you can select between
ext2, ext3 and reiserfs as your f
On Sunday 22 December 2002 20:39, Dominique wrote:
> The scenario was: I started with default (so 2.2 I guess) then I
> upgreaded the system to 2.4.19 via the net. Installing 2.2 I wasnt given
> ext2/3/reiser choice, so I went for ext2, upgreaded system to kernel
> 2.4.19, added reiserfs stuff wit
On Monday 20 January 2003 21:48, A.L.Meyers wrote:
> about not finding the corresponding files. How can I stop Debian from
> trying to load modules during boot?
Edit /etc/modules
Also init will sometimes try to load modules during boot from some of the
scripts in
/etc/rcS.d
So its possible y
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:54, Greg Ward wrote:
> I've been having a really annoying problem with X: when I hit
> Shift+NumLock, it launches into an infinite beeping loop. This is the
Verified on my ASUS 1300 laptop. Kinda stinks..
Anders
--
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.1
On Saturday 01 March 2003 06:21, Nicolas Velasquez wrote:
> I was just wondering is kde3 too far from sarge, are there some time
> estimations???
First it has to go into Sid. There is still a lot that hasn't been accepted
yet there, and it could be anywhere from a couple of weeks to a couple of
On Monday 16 June 2003 03:34, Svein E. Seldal wrote:
> However, I have been running sid on my laptop for say three months now,
> and it works like a charm. I've had no stability-problems at all... So
> based on my experience, I'd say that sid isn't _that_ unstable. (I've
> had some dependecy probl
On Sunday 27 July 2003 13:03, Markus Grunwald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is the current state of "testing" really THAT bad ?
Yep. But unstable r0x!
Anders
--
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.1.2 on Debian GNU/Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
On Sunday 27 July 2003 13:58, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> The fact that many people find themselves forced to run debian against
> recommended practice is a clear symptom of a system error. Fixing the
> symptom (telling users to run stable and backport applications themselves)
> does not fix the flaw.
On Monday 28 July 2003 01:11, Richard Lamont wrote:
> The moment you start mixing in testing or unstable, this breaks,
> because before you know it the damn thing is installing a bleeding-edge
> libc6 when you least expect it and you're very soon into rpm-style
> dependency hell. And there's no se
On Friday 19 September 2003 11:29, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> Sorry, it was late in the day and I forgot to add a ":)".
And now you just got fresh and rested from two hours of sleep?
Anders
--
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.1.3 on Debian GNU/Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Friday 19 September 2003 12:57, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> > And now you just got fresh and rested from two hours of sleep?
> Actually, I got home from work. Are you saying I need a rest to remember
> that I forgot to add a smiley to something I said in jest?
Nahh. Not saying anything at all.
I
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 17:29, Colin Watson wrote:
> As for the version number, this is so that new features in 2.6 can be
> supported. It doesn't mean that you have to be running 2.6.
I hope it doesn't mean that I can't use a higher version either.
Seriously I thought this was major
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 13:13, Rajkumar S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in my testing installation, libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers
>2.5.999-test7-bk-9, but one of the programs I
I had a discussion about this in another mailinglist a while back, the
linux-kernel-headers p
On Saturday 10 April 2004 15:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What package is make-kpkg part of? Ive tried searching for it, but I
> cant find it anywhere.
apt-get install kernel-package
Anders
--
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.2.1 on Debian GNU/Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Monday 26 April 2004 05:31, Chuck Bearden wrote:
> I don't remember exactly what packages were upgraded last time, but they
> *may* have included the 'discover' package.
>
> Any pointers would be welcome. I'd like to keep the hardware detection
> as simple and consistent as possible.
I don't
On Monday 26 April 2004 08:39, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> On Monday 26 April 2004 05:31, Chuck Bearden wrote:
> > I don't remember exactly what packages were upgraded last time, but they
> > *may* have included the 'discover' package.
> >
> > A
On Thursday 29 April 2004 05:37, Joe Spears wrote:
> The hardware detection problem appears to be that the "discover" package
> in Sarge was renamed to "discover1".
Well I don't know what crazy stuff is going on in sarge these days, but in sid
we have discover, and discover1.
discover is the late
On Friday 16 July 2004 16:38, Jason Martens wrote:
> I know there were some new samba packages that just came through, but
> has anyone else seen this behavior?
Has it worked for you before?
Have you got the kernel module smbfs?
Have you got the smbfs package installed?
Anders
--
This email w
On Monday 26 July 2004 12:59, Pradeeper wrote:
> I installed Sarge and downloaded latest kernel 2.6.7 from www.kernel.org
Why? kernel-source-2.6.7 (2.6.7-3) is in testing. Along with kernel-package,
you should have no problem creating a debian package from that source, which
is easy to install.
On Monday 26 July 2004 14:41, Alexandru Cabuz wrote:
> Good day to all,
>
> Here is a little report on the Sarge NetInst (I'm pretty sure I used
> yesterday's build, 20040725) on HP Omnibook XE3. Kernel 2.6.7.
I believe that debian-boot would be better for this kind of report.
Anders
--
This em
On Sunday 22 December 2002 10:01, Dominique wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed debian on my PC. There was no reiserfs by default so I added
> one (latest I could find). And severe problems began:
Sounds strange. If you use the bf2.4 install image you can select between
ext2, ext3 and reiserfs as your f
On Sunday 22 December 2002 20:39, Dominique wrote:
> The scenario was: I started with default (so 2.2 I guess) then I
> upgreaded the system to 2.4.19 via the net. Installing 2.2 I wasnt given
> ext2/3/reiser choice, so I went for ext2, upgreaded system to kernel
> 2.4.19, added reiserfs stuff wit
On Monday 20 January 2003 21:48, A.L.Meyers wrote:
> about not finding the corresponding files. How can I stop Debian from
> trying to load modules during boot?
Edit /etc/modules
Also init will sometimes try to load modules during boot from some of the
scripts in
/etc/rcS.d
So its possible y
On Tuesday 28 January 2003 15:54, Greg Ward wrote:
> I've been having a really annoying problem with X: when I hit
> Shift+NumLock, it launches into an infinite beeping loop. This is the
Verified on my ASUS 1300 laptop. Kinda stinks..
Anders
--
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.1
On Saturday 01 March 2003 06:21, Nicolas Velasquez wrote:
> I was just wondering is kde3 too far from sarge, are there some time
> estimations???
First it has to go into Sid. There is still a lot that hasn't been accepted
yet there, and it could be anywhere from a couple of weeks to a couple of
On Monday 16 June 2003 03:34, Svein E. Seldal wrote:
> However, I have been running sid on my laptop for say three months now,
> and it works like a charm. I've had no stability-problems at all... So
> based on my experience, I'd say that sid isn't _that_ unstable. (I've
> had some dependecy probl
On Sunday 27 July 2003 13:03, Markus Grunwald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is the current state of "testing" really THAT bad ?
Yep. But unstable r0x!
Anders
--
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.1.2 on Debian GNU/Linux
On Sunday 27 July 2003 13:58, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> The fact that many people find themselves forced to run debian against
> recommended practice is a clear symptom of a system error. Fixing the
> symptom (telling users to run stable and backport applications themselves)
> does not fix the flaw.
On Monday 28 July 2003 01:11, Richard Lamont wrote:
> The moment you start mixing in testing or unstable, this breaks,
> because before you know it the damn thing is installing a bleeding-edge
> libc6 when you least expect it and you're very soon into rpm-style
> dependency hell. And there's no se
On Friday 19 September 2003 11:29, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> Sorry, it was late in the day and I forgot to add a ":)".
And now you just got fresh and rested from two hours of sleep?
Anders
--
This email was generated using KMail from KDE 3.1.3 on Debian GNU/Linux
On Friday 19 September 2003 12:57, Tarragon Allen wrote:
> > And now you just got fresh and rested from two hours of sleep?
> Actually, I got home from work. Are you saying I need a rest to remember
> that I forgot to add a smiley to something I said in jest?
Nahh. Not saying anything at all.
I
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 17:29, Colin Watson wrote:
> As for the version number, this is so that new features in 2.6 can be
> supported. It doesn't mean that you have to be running 2.6.
I hope it doesn't mean that I can't use a higher version either.
Seriously I thought this was major
32 matches
Mail list logo
