Re: [Openswan Users] NAT-T in native stack??

2004-03-31 Thread Marcel J.E. Mol
Lewis, did you set nat_traversal=yes in ipsec.conf? I guess this as the '[disabled]' tag appears in my logs when I set it to no or leave this out. -Marcel On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 05:01:49PM +1000, Lewis Shobbrook wrote: > Hi Rene, > > I've been testing the new native ipsec stack with Fr

Re: [Openswan Users] NAT-T in native stack??

2004-03-31 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Lewis Shobbrook wrote: > Is there an incompatibility here, or am I missing something on how to > enable the NAT traversal. You forgot: nat_traversal=yes ? Perhaps Rene wants to enable this per default. Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Nautilus / Gconf Problems

2004-03-31 Thread Robert Good
Is anyone else having problems with apps that use gconf not installing correctly in the past few days? -Rob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Openswan Users] NAT-T in native stack??

2004-03-31 Thread Rene Mayrhofer
Paul Wouters wrote: You forgot: nat_traversal=yes ? Perhaps Rene wants to enable this per default. Might be an option, but I used to set it off by default because it broke stuff in earlier freeswan releases (where I applied the NAT-T patch). Is it "safe" now, i.e. is _everything_ expected to wor