Hi all
During the last apt-get dist-upgrade yesterday my KDE 2.2.2 installation on
sarge was replaced by several kde 3.1 files and libraries.
kde was deleted and not replaced.
So i tried to replace it myself.
It looks like several dependencies are not met to install kde 3.1
So I tryed to go back
Just found out that his is a know issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=217351
-Benoit-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
This is slightly offtopic since it's a question about unstable, but
unstable becomes testing eventually, so maybe it's just indirectly on
topic.
Why does libc6-dev require linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7 now in
unstable?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:28:45AM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> Hello,
> This is slightly offtopic since it's a question about unstable, but
> unstable becomes testing eventually, so maybe it's just indirectly on
> topic.
>
> Why does libc6-dev require linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7 now in
>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:28:45AM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> Why does libc6-dev require linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7 now in
> unstable?
linux-kernel-headers was formerly part of libc6-dev. You always had it
installed anyway, it's just in a separate package now for ease of
maintenance.
As fo
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 17:29, Colin Watson wrote:
> As for the version number, this is so that new features in 2.6 can be
> supported. It doesn't mean that you have to be running 2.6.
I hope it doesn't mean that I can't use a higher version either.
Seriously I thought this was major
Hi all
During the last apt-get dist-upgrade yesterday my KDE 2.2.2 installation on
sarge was replaced by several kde 3.1 files and libraries.
kde was deleted and not replaced.
So i tried to replace it myself.
It looks like several dependencies are not met to install kde 3.1
So I tryed to go back
Just found out that his is a know issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=217351
-Benoit-
Hello,
This is slightly offtopic since it's a question about unstable, but
unstable becomes testing eventually, so maybe it's just indirectly on
topic.
Why does libc6-dev require linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7 now in
unstable?
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:28:45AM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> Hello,
> This is slightly offtopic since it's a question about unstable, but
> unstable becomes testing eventually, so maybe it's just indirectly on
> topic.
>
> Why does libc6-dev require linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7 now in
>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:28:45AM -0500, Levi Bard wrote:
> Why does libc6-dev require linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7 now in
> unstable?
linux-kernel-headers was formerly part of libc6-dev. You always had it
installed anyway, it's just in a separate package now for ease of
maintenance.
As fo
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 17:29, Colin Watson wrote:
> As for the version number, this is so that new features in 2.6 can be
> supported. It doesn't mean that you have to be running 2.6.
I hope it doesn't mean that I can't use a higher version either.
Seriously I thought this was major
12 matches
Mail list logo
