Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Brandon Mitchell wrote:
> >
> > > And before you get the silly idea that chroot is secure, there is also
> > > "chroot /proc/1/root".
> >
> > Does that seriously work?? Do
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Brandon Mitchell wrote:
>
> > And before you get the silly idea that chroot is secure, there is also
> > "chroot /proc/1/root".
>
> Does that seriously work?? Do the kernel people know? Gah - that sucks!
It's been around a lo
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Brandon Mitchell wrote:
>> And before you get the silly idea that chroot is secure, there is also
>> "chroot /proc/1/root".
> Does that seriously work?? Do the kernel people know? Gah - that sucks!
Huh? If you are root, you can d
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Brandon Mitchell wrote:
> And before you get the silly idea that chroot is secure, there is also
> "chroot /proc/1/root".
Does that seriously work?? Do the kernel people know? Gah - that sucks!
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 04:48:52AM +0200 , Shaul Karl wrote:
> > BTW: Is the chroot reversible in some way (is there a way back)?
>
> exit
And before you get the silly idea that chroot is secure, there is also
"chroot /proc/1/root".
Brandon
Brandon M
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 04:48:52AM +0200 , Shaul Karl wrote:
> BTW: Is the chroot reversible in some way (is there a way back)?
exit
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Keep playing around with bf-common:
After issuing
rakefet:/# /root/pkgsel
I got
/root/pkgsel: [: too many arguments
And then I got the ncurses screen of Debian Installation.
1) The marked line is able to be in the 3rd and 5th empty lines, although only
the 1st, 2nd and 4th are
7 matches
Mail list logo