Anthony Towns writes:
> Are you sure this is the cause of the perl upgrade mess though? Apt tries
> to immediately configure essential packages wherever possible, afaik, which
> means Depends: generally end up the same as Pre-Depends: anyway, no?
I'm using apt. The log I posted shows apt blowin
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 09:56:00PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are you sure this is the cause of the perl upgrade mess though? Apt tries
> > to immediately configure essential packages wherever possible, afaik, which
> > means Depends: general
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you sure this is the cause of the perl upgrade mess though? Apt tries
> to immediately configure essential packages wherever possible, afaik, which
> means Depends: generally end up the same as Pre-Depends: anyway, no?
I'm using apt. The log I pos
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Aha! More importantly, there's the non-essential, but required and depended
> upon by perl (not perl-base) package libdb2, which doesn't Pre-Depend: on
> libc6.
Correct.
> I think what's happening is that:
>/usr/bin/perl (provided by perl-base.deb) is essential a
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aha! More importantly, there's the non-essential, but required and depended
> upon by perl (not perl-base) package libdb2, which doesn't Pre-Depend: on
> libc6.
Correct.
> I think what's happening is that:
>/usr/bin/perl (provided by perl-base
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 05:26:33PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> There are three other essential packages in unstable which depend on
> libc6 without using a Pre-Depends, namely base-passwd_3.2.1,
> hostname_2.08 and ncurses-bin_5.2.20010318-2.
Aha! More importantly, there's the non-essential, but
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 05:26:33PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> There are three other essential packages in unstable which depend on
> libc6 without using a Pre-Depends, namely base-passwd_3.2.1,
> hostname_2.08 and ncurses-bin_5.2.20010318-2.
Aha! More importantly, there's the non-essential, bu
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 03:01:25PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I know ... we are really waiting on boot floppies, but it seems very
> Sartrean.
Shouldn't be waiting too much longer. The install report looks good,
although as you can see I changed bits of it to taste.
What do you think about an h
8 matches
Mail list logo