hi,
On Thu Feb 13, 2003 at 08:30:27 +0100, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Does anybody know why stable/updates/main on http://security.debian.org
> has a package that depends on a libc that is not available for Stable?
yes, because the package you are trying to install is neither in stable
nor in its up
Hi,
On Tue Jun 17, 2003 at 10:44:01 -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 11:56:36PM +1000, Mark Devin wrote:
> > I was going to say exactly this earlier in the thread. I put this
> > in My
> > Apache config quite some time ago when I realised I could. There
> > should
> > be
Hi,
On Wed Jul 02, 2003 at 22:50:20 -0300, Peter Cordes wrote:
> Luckily, that's a solved problem. Con Kolivas's -ck3 patch for 2.4.21
> includes grsecurity and XFS. (I didn't mention it before because I didn't
> realize it was significant. (I'm not using ACLs).) Con's webpage is
> http://memb
Hi,
On Wed Jul 09, 2003 at 23:16:51 +0200, François TOURDE wrote:
> > By allowing connections from only a
> > few IP address blocks, you cut out most of the crackers in the world, but
> > don't have to mess with dynamic DNS and lack of reverse lookup; A good
> > tradeoff between security and con
Hi Bruce,
On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
> info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
> Source anywh
Hi,
On Sun Feb 29, 2004 at 21:15:39 +0100, Nejc Novak wrote:
> I would like to make users avaiable some kind of 'web control panel'. I
> have created a design and also already intergrated squirrelmail into it.
> Now i would also them to have a web form for password changing. I've
> browsd fresh
hi,
On Thu Feb 13, 2003 at 08:30:27 +0100, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Does anybody know why stable/updates/main on http://security.debian.org
> has a package that depends on a libc that is not available for Stable?
yes, because the package you are trying to install is neither in stable
nor in its up
Hi,
On Tue Jun 17, 2003 at 10:44:01 -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 11:56:36PM +1000, Mark Devin wrote:
> > I was going to say exactly this earlier in the thread. I put this
> > in My
> > Apache config quite some time ago when I realised I could. There
> > should
> > be
Hi,
On Wed Jul 02, 2003 at 22:50:20 -0300, Peter Cordes wrote:
> Luckily, that's a solved problem. Con Kolivas's -ck3 patch for 2.4.21
> includes grsecurity and XFS. (I didn't mention it before because I didn't
> realize it was significant. (I'm not using ACLs).) Con's webpage is
> http://memb
Hi,
On Wed Jul 09, 2003 at 23:16:51 +0200, François TOURDE wrote:
> > By allowing connections from only a
> > few IP address blocks, you cut out most of the crackers in the world, but
> > don't have to mess with dynamic DNS and lack of reverse lookup; A good
> > tradeoff between security and con
Hi Bruce,
On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
> info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
> Source anywh
Hi,
On Sun Feb 29, 2004 at 21:15:39 +0100, Nejc Novak wrote:
> I would like to make users avaiable some kind of 'web control panel'. I
> have created a design and also already intergrated squirrelmail into it.
> Now i would also them to have a web form for password changing. I've
> browsd fresh
Hi,
On 23.01. 07:46, Jose Marrero wrote:
> Apache configured with mod_rewrite to deny blank or fake referers is a
> good idea.
How can you tell that a referrer is fake?
Regards,
uLI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
On 15.05. 17:09, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> What is "the Debian way" to prevent any daemon from ever starting,
> whether upon reboot, upon upgrade, upon new install etc.
If your default runlevel is 2, delete the symlink to the respective init
script in /etc/rc2.d or even in /etc/rc[2345].d. Just m
Hi,
On 07.01. 13:54, Adam Majer wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > CVE-2007-3382
> >
> > It was discovered that single quotes (') in cookies were treated
> > as a delimiter, which could lead to an information leak.
> >
> > CVE-2007-3385
> >
> > It was discovered that the charact
hi,
maybe i misunderstand the intention here, but isn't it pointless to
restrict privileges of the editing process of /etc/aliases if you could
just as well change root's alias to a program that's run whenever root
receives email and, e. g., puts one's most favourite /etc/passwd in
place of the o
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 05:32:04PM + or thereabouts, Martin WHEELER wrote:
> Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
>
> openfind.com.tw
> ...
> Anyone know of a sure-fire robot killer under woody?
as a first recourse you could instruct your firewall to deny all access
from op
hi,
maybe i misunderstand the intention here, but isn't it pointless to
restrict privileges of the editing process of /etc/aliases if you could
just as well change root's alias to a program that's run whenever root
receives email and, e. g., puts one's most favourite /etc/passwd in
place of the or
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:11:00PM +0200 or thereabouts, InfoEmergencias - Luis
Gómez wrote:
> Messing up with sshd_config for all the privsep stuff, I've noticed that
> PermitRootLogin was set to yes in my three woody boxes. I usually
> consider this a problem (although it has been my fault - i s
19 matches
Mail list logo
