Alexander Klauer wrote:
> why has the installed-size of openoffice-org.bin been reduced by
> almost 60M in this update?
because 9sarge2 was built broken (autobuilder didn't strip it due to a
bug and no one noticed). 9sarge3 was built on my i386 and did get
stripped.
Everything OK, we already got
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that
> > hunspell dictionaries
> > then will also work. And you show that hunspel
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > T
Hi,
Davide Prina wrote:
> > MySpell is obsolete.
> > Please build against Hunspell, which is an improved version of MySpell
> > retaining full backwards compatibility. That also would make the usage
> > of hunspell-de-* in iceweasel possible.
>
> probably not so full backwards compatibility.
Proo
Hi,
Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Martin Schulze:
> >
> >> Package: openoffice.org
> >> Vulnerability : several
> >> Problem type : local (remote)
> >> Debian-specific: no
> >> CVE IDs: CVE-2007-0002 CVE-2007-0238 CVE-2007-0239
> >
> > Does this also
Hi,
Manon Metten wrote:
> For the testing distribution (etch) these problems have been fixed in
> >version 2.0.4.dfsg.2-6.
[...]
> I checked with 'apt-cache show openoffice.org' and somewhere I found
> 'Version: 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5'.
[...]>
> Is there anything wrong or missing in this sources.list?
W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
*sigh*. too late...
Typoed the email address. Forward...
- - Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:43:30 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kevin B. McCarty&q
[ resend, I just saw even -release and -openoffice were in the mail... ]
Hi,
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> I noticed that the latest OpenOffice.org security update in Etch
> (version 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7etch1, which fixed DSA 1307) depends on libneon25
> whereas the previous Etch version (2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etc
Package: iceape
Version: 1.1.9-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
While test building iceape against the soon-to-be-released hunspell 1.2.2
I noticed that iceape ships an own expat in parser/xml/expat/lib.
Looking there, it seems 1.95.7 but I have no idea whether/how it is patched.
Debian has 1.95.8.
Can
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.9-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
While test building icedove against the soon-to-be-released hunspell 1.2.2
I noticed that icedove ships an own expat in parser/xml/expat/lib.
Looking there, it seems 1.95.7 but I have no idea whether/how it is patched.
Debian has 1.95.8.
Package: iceweasel
Version: 2.0.0.13-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
While test building iceweasel against the soon-to-be-released hunspell 1.2.2
I noticed that iceweasel ships an own expat in parser/xml/expat/lib.
Looking there, it seems 1.95.7 but I have no idea whether/how it is patched.
Debian has
Package: xulrunner
Version: 1.8.1.13-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
While test building xulrunner against the soon-to-be-released hunspell 1.2.2
I noticed that xulrunner ships an own expat in parser/xml/expat/lib.
Looking there, it seems 1.95.7 but I have no idea whether/how it is patched.
Debian has
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:29:59PM +, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> For the testing (stretch) and unstable (sid) distributions, these
> problems have been fixed in version 1:5.1.1~rc1-1.
Actually, as I said (and as said upstream, it's fixed in 5.0.5 release), it's
fixed since 5.0.5 rc1, so the v
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:58:05AM +, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The upgrade to Samba 4.2 issued as DSA-3548-1 introduced a packaging
> regression causing an additional dependency on the samba binary package
> for the samba-libs, samba-common-bin, python-samba and samba-vfs-modules
> bi
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:13:25PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> We issued a regression update:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00160.html
>
> To answer your question still, if you set the kernel parameter to
> stack_guard_gap=1 this wuould effectively re
debian/rules:
- fix variable to not add kfreebsd-i386 to OOO_MONO_ARCHS twice but
to actually add it to OOO_MOZILLA_ARCHS
-- Rene Engelhard Mon, 31 May 2010 22:50:07 +0200
(I of course will fix the .changes to contain testing or testing-security)
The 1:3.2.0-11~bpo50+1 upload to le
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:22:36PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Would it be possible to upload a minimal version only carrying the security
> patch to testing-security?
Possible, yes. I'd like to avoid that, though if possible.
It would need a rebuild, whereas I can upload -11 as-is already
(a
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:32:26PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> (and it fixes some other important stuff, too, as you see in the changelog.
> No XML signing support *only* on kfreebsd-i386 is, umm, bad. Same as
> dependency
> differences because of the bashisms...)
Oh, and
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 09:17:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > * debian/rules:
> > - fix variable to not add kfreebsd-i386 to OOO_MONO_ARCHS twice but
> > to actually add it to OOO_MOZILLA_ARCHS
Yes. (What you mentioned is debian/control regenerated with this)
Grüße/Regards,
Re
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 03:32:26PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Would it be possible to upload a minimal version only carrying the security
> > patch to testing-security?
>
> Possible, yes. I'd like to avoid that, though if possible.
> It would need a rebuild
close 592399 2.3.7-2+lenny3
thanks
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 09:05:46AM +0200, Davide Mirtillo wrote:
> Hello, i just ran the update via aptitude, and apt-listbug reported the
> package as affected by bug #592399 [1]. Aptitude installed
> 2.3.7-2+lenny4, and that version is not marked as bug-free in
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:27:05PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze1 has been on security-master for a few days
> now, but it's not visible yet.
It seems it didn't even end up in t-s but directly propagated to t-p-u..
I at least did get the propagation mails but yes, it doesn't
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 02:51:03PM -0500, Chris Swenson wrote:
>I assume this would include LibreOffice?
Yes, actually the
> For the testing distribution (wheezy), and the unstable distribution
> (sid),
> this problem will be fixed soon.
is wrong and should read
"For the test
23 matches
Mail list logo
