unknown udp port

Hi all, Anyone knows what 1025 udp stands for? This is a newly installed woody on a sparc classic. ns1:/etc# netstat -l Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State tcp0 0 *:smtp *:* LISTEN

RE: unknown udp port

[named] 12835 pts/1S 0:00 grep 151 ~kmag > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:54 PM > To: Costas Magos > Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: unknown udp port > > >

RE: unknown udp port

Georgatos Evaggelos wrote: >Well which bind version are you running?? The bind version I am using is the default woody version, that is 9.2.1. > Could it be an rndc or ndc listener?? rndc listens on 953 tcp > Have you made any special configuration in order to set the queries > source port ??

RE: unknown udp port

Some more info: I killed and restarted named. the udp port that named seems to be listening on has now changed to 1026 ~kmag > -Original Message- > From: Costas Magos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:06 PM > To: debian-security@lists.debian.o

Re: unknown udp port

ok, I get it now. In the configuration file there is the commented out line // query-source address * port 53; which activates the default query-source address * port *; I couldn't understand the relation between the above configuration option (which specifies an address and port to use when

RE: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path

> But, is there something I _should_ do in this situation, like > including > some text in the bounce saying that this address has never > existed, and > is being abused by spammers? If yes, _how_ should I do it? I don't know what exactly you should do, i am not aware of the best practices ab

RE: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path

> -Original Message- > From: Robert L. Waite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:30 PM > To: Costas Magos > Subject: Re: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:27:26PM +0200, Costas Mag

Re: FTP-SSL

Another non-free client is CuteFTP pro. It supports ftp-ssl, ftp-ssh, https and more ~kmag Yahoo wrote: Hi I am interesting to setup a ftp daemon with SSL option, which is an useful option ??? and I need some ftp-ssl client for windows 2000, is there anyone free ? Regards PD: Sorr

SSL proxy server

me in any way with such a configuration? Thanks all in advance. Costas Magos Ariadne-t Network ~kmag Please do not CC me, as I am subscribed to debian-security

Re: SSL proxy server

Thank you all guys. I now have enough info to start. :-) ~kmag

Re: configure ssh-access

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I want to make ssh-access possible only from a restricted number of hosts - those that are named in /etc/hosts.allow. Users who want to login have a DynDNS host-name that shall be listed in hosts.allow to make it possible for users with a dial-up internet connecti

Re: Versign has hijacked www.xmms.org

Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:08:29AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: I was surfing the Website for new skins and at one klick... ...xmms was hijacked !!! No access on xmms posibel. Can anyone confirm this please... Please Cc: me. Nope.

unknown udp port

Hi all, Anyone knows what 1025 udp stands for? This is a newly installed woody on a sparc classic. ns1:/etc# netstat -l Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State tcp0 0 *:smtp *:* LISTEN

RE: unknown udp port

[named] 12835 pts/1S 0:00 grep 151 ~kmag > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:54 PM > To: Costas Magos > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: unknown udp port > > > On Thu, Nov 2

RE: unknown udp port

Georgatos Evaggelos wrote: >Well which bind version are you running?? The bind version I am using is the default woody version, that is 9.2.1. > Could it be an rndc or ndc listener?? rndc listens on 953 tcp > Have you made any special configuration in order to set the queries > source port ??

RE: unknown udp port

Some more info: I killed and restarted named. the udp port that named seems to be listening on has now changed to 1026 ~kmag > -Original Message- > From: Costas Magos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

Re: unknown udp port

ok, I get it now. In the configuration file there is the commented out line // query-source address * port 53; which activates the default query-source address * port *; I couldn't understand the relation between the above configuration option (which specifies an address and port to use when

RE: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path

> But, is there something I _should_ do in this situation, like > including > some text in the bounce saying that this address has never > existed, and > is being abused by spammers? If yes, _how_ should I do it? I don't know what exactly you should do, i am not aware of the best practices ab

RE: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path

> -Original Message- > From: Robert L. Waite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:30 PM > To: Costas Magos > Subject: Re: Spammers using a non-existant address as return-path > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:27:26PM +0200, Costas Mag

Re: FTP-SSL

Another non-free client is CuteFTP pro. It supports ftp-ssl, ftp-ssh, https and more ~kmag Yahoo wrote: Hi I am interesting to setup a ftp daemon with SSL option, which is an useful option ??? and I need some ftp-ssl client for windows 2000, is there anyone free ? Regards PD: Sorry b

Re: configure ssh-access

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I want to make ssh-access possible only from a restricted number of hosts - those that are named in /etc/hosts.allow. Users who want to login have a DynDNS host-name that shall be listed in hosts.allow to make it possible for users with a dial-up internet connection

Re: Versign has hijacked www.xmms.org

Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:08:29AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: I was surfing the Website for new skins and at one klick... ...xmms was hijacked !!! No access on xmms posibel. Can anyone confirm this please... Please Cc: me. Nope. Worke