On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:35:01 +, Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> or maybe a FreeS/WAN implementation for cygwin (is there a native win
>> implementation?)
>> ... but thats a different problem ...
>
>I doubt it. FreeSWAN uses Linux kernel patches and
>kernel crypto.
You'd be suprised:
h
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 11:08:38 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The problem is that I can only login to the ssh-machine
>when I enter the IP-address to the hosts.allow file.
>Specifying the hosts DNS-name does not work!
Thats probably because it does a reverse lookup on the connecting ip to see
if i
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:18:31 -0500, Andrés Roldán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Is there any way, a tool or something to do that?
>
You could install apt-listchanges. You'll get an email with the relevant
changelog entries when something is upgraded.
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 16:01:39 +0200, Thijs Welman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>My loganalyzer showed four "Did not receive identification string from
>w.x.y.z" logentries from sshd. This happens all the time and i certainly
>don't check all of them out, but i happen to do so this time.
That's pro
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:09:11 +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I bet there are a lot of users running around scared, not knowing what
>to do really... Any advices for us??
Keep your eye on http://www.wiggy.net/debian/status/
Expect more details to appear there in a day or two.
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 16:02:42 +0200, "Craig Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi Guys
>
>Is there any way of changing the banner in Apache like you can for
>proftpd lets say?
If you specify:
ServerTokens ProductOnly
in httpd.conf it'll just say "Apache" instead of giving out version numbers
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:02:54 +0200, Massimiliano Mirra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-get source
>libpam-sfs was not working in the first place). The problem with
>libsfscrypt happens at configure time: the lib is there but configure
>can't s
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:35:01 +, Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> or maybe a FreeS/WAN implementation for cygwin (is there a native win
>> implementation?)
>> ... but thats a different problem ...
>
>I doubt it. FreeSWAN uses Linux kernel patches and
>kernel crypto.
You'd be suprised:
h
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 11:08:38 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The problem is that I can only login to the ssh-machine
>when I enter the IP-address to the hosts.allow file.
>Specifying the hosts DNS-name does not work!
Thats probably because it does a reverse lookup on the connecting ip to see
if i
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:18:31 -0500, Andrés Roldán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Is there any way, a tool or something to do that?
>
You could install apt-listchanges. You'll get an email with the relevant
changelog entries when something is upgraded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 16:01:39 +0200, Thijs Welman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>My loganalyzer showed four "Did not receive identification string from
>w.x.y.z" logentries from sshd. This happens all the time and i certainly
>don't check all of them out, but i happen to do so this time.
That's pro
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:09:11 +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I bet there are a lot of users running around scared, not knowing what
>to do really... Any advices for us??
Keep your eye on http://www.wiggy.net/debian/status/
Expect more details to appear there in a day or two.
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 16:02:42 +0200, "Craig Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi Guys
>
>Is there any way of changing the banner in Apache like you can for
>proftpd lets say?
If you specify:
ServerTokens ProductOnly
in httpd.conf it'll just say "Apache" instead of giving out version numbers
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:24:47 +0100, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>apt-get install debsign
don't you mean debsig-verify ?
Alan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:03:26 -0500 (EST), Emmanuel Valliet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There was a good article of Aleph One on buffer overflows called
>'Smashing the stack for fun and profit'. Phrack 49.
>Search the web and enjoy :)
I found this one to be quite informative too:
http://www.cult
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:19:33 +0100, Marcus Frings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>first I would like to apologize for my English as I am not a native
>speaker.
Your English is very good actually, you need not apologise.
>*a* and *b* confuses me a little. Although rndc.key is in the chr
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:02:17 -0300, Pedro Zorzenon Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've looked in "man sshd" and "man ssh" and I didn't see any
>configuration option which bypass the reverse lookup, enabling
>connections from machines without reverse DNS lookup. How can I do
>this? (I don't w
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 13:25:18 +0100, Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Where I can more information about Trin00?
Well google of course:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Trin00&btnG=Google+Search
First hit:
http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/trinoo.analysis
T
On Wed, 15 May 2002 11:37:32 +0200, Simon Langhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I wrote:
>
>> Well, a towel could be your chance to get away from the earth when it
>> is destroyed. So is _is_ a form of security :)
>
>Oops, time to read it again. It is obviously not the towel, that gets you away.
N
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:24:47 +0100, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>apt-get install debsign
don't you mean debsig-verify ?
Alan.
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:03:26 -0500 (EST), Emmanuel Valliet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There was a good article of Aleph One on buffer overflows called
>'Smashing the stack for fun and profit'. Phrack 49.
>Search the web and enjoy :)
I found this one to be quite informative too:
http://www.cultd
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:19:33 +0100, Marcus Frings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>first I would like to apologize for my English as I am not a native
>speaker.
Your English is very good actually, you need not apologise.
>*a* and *b* confuses me a little. Although rndc.key is in the chro
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:02:17 -0300, Pedro Zorzenon Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've looked in "man sshd" and "man ssh" and I didn't see any
>configuration option which bypass the reverse lookup, enabling
>connections from machines without reverse DNS lookup. How can I do
>this? (I don't wa
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 13:25:18 +0100, Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Where I can more information about Trin00?
Well google of course:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Trin00&btnG=Google+Search
First hit:
http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/trinoo.analysis
Tr
On Wed, 15 May 2002 11:37:32 +0200, Simon Langhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I wrote:
>
>> Well, a towel could be your chance to get away from the earth when it
>> is destroyed. So is _is_ a form of security :)
>
>Oops, time to read it again. It is obviously not the towel, that gets you away.
No
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 13:46:14 +1000, Shane Machon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Does anyone know if this effects potato's apache-ssl package also?
Yes it does.
>Is anyone able to confirm this?
>
The maintainer ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2002/debian-apache-200206/msg00024.html
--
To
nf I've changed :
*.=notice;*.=warn |/dev/xconsole
to
*.=notice;*.=warn |/dev/tty8
Does the trick for me.
Alan.
--
Alan James
PGP: 0x66EB09FC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:05:23 +1000, Geoff Crompton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't remember, but does FreeSwan support specifying connections
> with domain names?
It does, but it seems to learn the ip address at startup and not bother to
look it up again before bringing up the connection
Apparently it is possible with Firebox 2 using ipsec manual:
http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/users/2001-June/000566.html
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:02:54 +0200, Massimiliano Mirra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, non-US source is there now (that was the reason apt-get source
>libpam-sfs was not working in the first place). The problem with
>libsfscrypt happens at configure time: the lib is there but configure
>can't se
30 matches
Mail list logo
