On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:24:28AM -0500, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> If a security bug were found in the afs client-side package, which is
> implemented as a kernel module, would the announcement not look just
> like the one we saw for DSA 1458-1?
See for yourself:
http://www.debian.org/security
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> We mention all the binary packages in the advisory because they're the
> versions that are going to be installed by apt* and people are going
> to want checksums, file sizes, etc.
.. For no good reason, since apt checks all those things for you.
That information is a confu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't think there is anything wrong with the templates... Just because
it doesn't suit you specifically doesn't mean it doesn't help out somebody
else. It's always better to have too much information than too little.
On Fri, January 11, 2008 1:07 pm
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:53:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > We mention all the binary packages in the advisory because they're the
> > versions that are going to be installed by apt* and people are going
> > to want checksums, file sizes, etc.
>
> .. For no good reason,
4 matches
Mail list logo
