* martin f. krafft:
>> I don't think so. Joey seems to be satisfied with this situation,
>
> How would you know?
Joey doesn't ignore all mail, only some of it.
> That's because complaints don't actually have any result, so I, for
> instance, have stopped. I've pointed to severe problems with De
* Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Florian Weimer]
>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but the current team doesn't seem to want
>> new members.
>
> I've been told that the current stable security team consist of one
> person doing the work, Martin Schulze. If this "team" do not want new
> members, something stra
also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.28.1154 +0200]:
> Or are there many packages with backported security patches, ready
> for upload, and the security team does not act on them? I don't
> think so.
This was the case throughout June.
> Maybe that's because it was a non-issue
* martin f. krafft:
> also sprach Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.28.1154 +0200]:
>> Or are there many packages with backported security patches, ready
>> for upload, and the security team does not act on them? I don't
>> think so.
>
> This was the case throughout June.
AFAIK, you ca
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
> AFAIK, you can only blame the security team for lack of communication.
nah ... they're doing fine .. to the extent is needed ??
if it's important... they will post dsa ??
> They were ready to upload the packages, but the infrastructure to
> process
also sprach Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.28.1328 +0200]:
> nah ... they're doing fine .. to the extent is needed ??
> if it's important... they will post dsa ??
Where have you been?
> what i think is needed is an automated script that checks
> debian against known exploits or a way to v
Alvin Oga wrote:
>
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>
>>AFAIK, you can only blame the security team for lack of communication.
>
>
> nah ... they're doing fine .. to the extent is needed ??
>
> if it's important... they will post dsa ??
There certainly have been exceptions to t
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 07:40:23AM +1000, Paul Gear wrote:
There certainly have been exceptions to that rule. The maintainer of
shorewall has been trying for weeks to get a DSA issued about a
vulnerability, and it seems we have to convince Joey that it *is* a
vulnerability before he'll issue it.
Paul Gear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvin Oga wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>AFAIK, you can only blame the security team for lack of communication.
>>
>>
>> nah ... they're doing fine .. to the extent is needed ??
>>
>> if it's important... they will pos
9 matches
Mail list logo
