binutils w PaX Vs binutils w SSP

PaX support in binutils and SSP compiled packages are two very nice things to have. The problem at this moment is that you cant have both at the same time at this moment. Using for example Steve Kemp's GCC w SSP[1], binutils comes compiled with SSP. If you then installs Petersen's binutils with

Re: binutils w PaX Vs binutils w SSP

On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 05:30:44PM +0200, Thomas Sj?gren wrote: > PaX support in binutils and SSP compiled packages are two very nice > things to have. The problem at this moment is that you cant have > both at the same time at this moment. > > Using for example Steve Kemp's GCC w SSP[1], binut

☆嘘・偽りのない在宅ワーク(想像と違い誰もがびっくり！)☆

$B!y13!&56$j$N$J$$:_Bp%o!<%/(B($BA[A|$H0c$$C/$b$,$S$C$/$j!*(B)$B!y(B (B $B(."""#(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,"#""(/(B (B $B%[%C%H!&%[%C%H!&%K%e!<%9(B $B!c(B2003.06.28$BH/9T!d(B $B(1"""#(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,"#""(0(B (B $B!Z"-

new tool - apt-method-https

Hello all, I've developed a simple HTTPS method for APT using Perl's LWP libraries. Unlike all the other implementations I've seen so far, it doesn't replace the existing APT package; it just adds a new method. Support for client certificates is included. Please try it and give feedback! More i