2004. április 11. 06:21 dátummal Noah Meyerhans ezt írta:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:19:00PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
>
> Only as ftp. But there have been a number of locally exploitable
> kernel vulnerabilities fairly recently, and an attacker could use one
> of these to obtain root access once they
On 04/11/04 21:15, LeVA wrote:
2004. április 11. 06:21 dátummal Noah Meyerhans ezt írta:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:19:00PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
Only as ftp. But there have been a number of locally exploitable
kernel vulnerabilities fairly recently, and an attacker could use one
of these to obt
> > at http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk
> It appears that WOLK is not in Debian. I would guess that given it's aim to
> Neither the URL you provide nor the Freshmeat entry list what patches are
> included in WOLK.
Well, there used to be such list, but then WOLK turned into closed project
Hello,
I have taken over the multi-gnome-terminal package recently and I have
found out that it has still the bugs described in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=104612710031920&w=2 . I have
contacted the upstream author. Furthermore I have found only _one_ DSA
for the xterm package t
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:28:31AM +0200, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote:
(..)
> After reboot, everything is working perfect. The question is where to
> start investigation. Can someone suggest some tool, to record statistics
> of CPU, Network, IO(drives) in correlation with processes ?
Use sysstat, a
Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have taken over the multi-gnome-terminal package recently and I have
> found out that it has still the bugs described in
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=104612710031920&w=2 . I have
> contacted the upstream author. Furthermore I
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 11:15:10AM +0200, LeVA wrote:
> I always compile the latest stable 2.4 kernel with loadable modules
> disabled, but I don't apply any kernel patches.
> Is this "safe", or I must apply some security patch?
None of the recent kernel-level vulnerabilities have required module
Dear Debian-security (Mon, 12 Apr 2004 01:42:00 +0300)
No prescripjhjhtion
required, no long lengthy forms to fill out.
(Orlkjder today 85 % off all Meds)
Dispcount Pharumacy Online
Saplveplu Up to 85% ordplering your meds online!
No Prescriptpluion required
Fast Disecreet shipgping over_nig
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:28:31AM +0200, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I''ve strange problem with one of my servers. From time to time (once
> per 2-3 months), something strange happends, and server starts working
> very slow. What is strange, CPU load (from top) is about 5%, but
> res
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 11:15:10AM +0200, LeVA wrote:
>> I always compile the latest stable 2.4 kernel with loadable modules
>> disabled, but I don't apply any kernel patches.
>> Is this "safe", or I must apply some security patch?
>
> None of the rece
2004. április 11. 06:21 dátummal Noah Meyerhans ezt írta:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:19:00PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
>
> Only as ftp. But there have been a number of locally exploitable
> kernel vulnerabilities fairly recently, and an attacker could use one
> of these to obtain root access once they
On 04/11/04 21:15, LeVA wrote:
2004. április 11. 06:21 dátummal Noah Meyerhans ezt írta:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:19:00PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
Only as ftp. But there have been a number of locally exploitable
kernel vulnerabilities fairly recently, and an attacker could use one
of these to obtain
> > at http://sourceforge.net/projects/wolk
> It appears that WOLK is not in Debian. I would guess that given it's aim to
> Neither the URL you provide nor the Freshmeat entry list what patches are
> included in WOLK.
Well, there used to be such list, but then WOLK turned into closed project
Hello,
I have taken over the multi-gnome-terminal package recently and I have
found out that it has still the bugs described in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=104612710031920&w=2 . I have
contacted the upstream author. Furthermore I have found only _one_ DSA
for the xterm package th
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:28:31AM +0200, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote:
(..)
> After reboot, everything is working perfect. The question is where to
> start investigation. Can someone suggest some tool, to record statistics
> of CPU, Network, IO(drives) in correlation with processes ?
Use sysstat, a
Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have taken over the multi-gnome-terminal package recently and I have
> found out that it has still the bugs described in
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=104612710031920&w=2 . I have
> contacted the upstream author. Furthermore I
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 11:15:10AM +0200, LeVA wrote:
> I always compile the latest stable 2.4 kernel with loadable modules
> disabled, but I don't apply any kernel patches.
> Is this "safe", or I must apply some security patch?
None of the recent kernel-level vulnerabilities have required module
Dear Debian-security (Mon, 12 Apr 2004 01:42:00 +0300)
No prescripjhjhtion
required, no long lengthy forms to fill out.
(Orlkjder today 85 % off all Meds)
Dispcount Pharumacy Online
Saplveplu Up to 85% ordplering your meds online!
No Prescriptpluion required
Fast Disecreet shipgping over_nig
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:28:31AM +0200, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I''ve strange problem with one of my servers. From time to time (once
> per 2-3 months), something strange happends, and server starts working
> very slow. What is strange, CPU load (from top) is about 5%, but
> res
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 11:15:10AM +0200, LeVA wrote:
>> I always compile the latest stable 2.4 kernel with loadable modules
>> disabled, but I don't apply any kernel patches.
>> Is this "safe", or I must apply some security patch?
>
> None of the rece
20 matches
Mail list logo
