I need a tool that does the following work:
checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
verify the digital signature and decrypts the mail;
parse the body;
executes 1 or more action (completely customizzable);
delete (archives) the mail;
in an endless loop.
Something like this already exists or I n
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:49, "Raffaele D'Elia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
If you use IMAP it should be possible for you to ask the server to notify you
when new mail is received. This should give you a faster response if the
server correctly implements
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 21:35 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> If you use IMAP it should be possible for you to ask the server to notify you
> when new mail is received.
...
> Last time I tested this functionality I found it not to work in Courier IMAP,
> but this may have been fixed in a more recen
Hi,
I've spent a few hours searching, what Im looking for is a discussion
of different security aspects of apt, questions like
- What are the possible threats in terms of ip spoofing, dns cache
poisoning? (are there any solutions in terms of PKI (PGP) or similar
discussed somewhere?)
- If I need t
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:57:37PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Hi. Thanks for this.
>
> * Name: Stephen Keeling
> * Company: TopQuark Software & Services Consulting Ltd.
> * Address: see homepage.
> * Phone: (403) 245-2939
> * Fax: N/A
> * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL: http://www
And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
> I need a tool that does the following work:
> checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
> verify the digital signature and decrypts the mail;
> parse the body;
> executes 1 or more action (completely customizzable);
> delete (archives) the mai
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:12:59PM +0100, Erik Hjelmås wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've spent a few hours searching, what Im looking for is a discussion
> of different security aspects of apt, questions like
> - What are the possible threats in terms of ip spoofing, dns cache
> poisoning? (are there any solu
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:19:28PM +0100, Horst Pflugstaedt wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:12:59PM +0100, Erik Hjelm?s wrote:
> > I've spent a few hours searching, what Im looking for is a discussion
> > of different security aspects of apt, questions like
> > - What are the possible threats
Erik Hjelmås wrote:
> any pointers to material which may be relevant are greatly appreciated
Check out [1]. Might be what you're interested in.
[1]. http://monk.debian.net/apt-secure/
--
Alf B Lervåg
Incoming from Jonas J Linde:
> And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
> > I need a tool that does the following work:
> > checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
So, IMAP is the wrong answer.
> > verify the digital signature and decrypts the mail;
GnuPG
> > parse the body;
pro
On 20.01.2004, at 10:31, Chris Morris wrote:
Safe mode would certainly have reduced the impact from that script, and
I'd definitely recommend turning it on unless you're very confident of
the quality of all your scripts.
There's also:
- register_globals off (its on by default PHP < 4.2, like in
/ 2004-01-25 11:06:08 -0700
\ s. keeling:
> > This sounds like an ideal job for the combination of the rather
> > appropriately named tools fetchmail and procmail, which - to no big
> > surprise - are suitable to fetch and process mail.
>
> Agreed. Add on gnupg for signature verification and decr
-Original Message-
From: "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:06:08 -0700
Subject: Re: Mail processing tool
> Incoming from Jonas J Linde:
> > And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
> > > I need a tool that does th
And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
> From: "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Incoming from Jonas J Linde:
>> > And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
>> > > I need a tool that does the following work:
>> > > checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
>> ...
>> pro
Jonas J Linde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Procmail is a big tool, I need something different: small, reliable,
>> secure.
>
> Big? The gzipped source tar ball is 227kB. If you want something that
> processes mail in a fully customizable way I'm pretty sure you won't find
> anything much smalle
Quoting Jonas J Linde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Never had any trouble with fetchmail except if setup badly; eg. with
> different programs accessing the same mail box but using different
> locking schemes.
Fetchmail's a useful tool, but it does require running a local MTA as an
inherent part of its d
* Rick Moen [Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:41:11 -0800]:
> Fetchmail's a useful tool, but it does require running a local MTA as an
> inherent part of its design. (It does that instead of, itself, having
> code to support mail stores.)
$ apt-cache show fetchmail | grep -i suggests
$ man fetchmail
Quoting Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Am I missing something?
http://www.catb.org/~esr/fetchmail/ includes:
"Fetchmail retrieves mail from remote mail servers and forwards it
via SMTP"
--
Cheers,
Rick Moen "vi is my shepherd; I shall not font."
[EMAIL PROT
* Rick Moen [Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:53:58 -0800]:
> Quoting Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Am I missing something?
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/fetchmail/ includes:
>"Fetchmail retrieves mail from remote mail servers and forwards it
>via SMTP"
fetchmail(1) includes:
-
Quoting Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> fetchmail(1) includes:
>
>-m | --mda
> (Keyword: mda) You can force mail to be passed to an MDA
> directly (rather than forwarded to port 25) with the --mda or -m
> option. To avoid losin
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 05:41:11PM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Jonas J Linde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Never had any trouble with fetchmail except if setup badly; eg. with
> > different programs accessing the same mail box but using different
> > locking schemes.
>
> Fetchmail's a useful t
I need a tool that does the following work:
checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
verify the digital signature and decrypts the mail;
parse the body;
executes 1 or more action (completely customizzable);
delete (archives) the mail;
in an endless loop.
Something like this already exists or I n
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:49, "Raffaele D'Elia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
If you use IMAP it should be possible for you to ask the server to notify you
when new mail is received. This should give you a faster response if the
server correctly implements
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 21:35 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> If you use IMAP it should be possible for you to ask the server to notify you
> when new mail is received.
...
> Last time I tested this functionality I found it not to work in Courier IMAP,
> but this may have been fixed in a more recen
Hi,
I've spent a few hours searching, what Im looking for is a discussion
of different security aspects of apt, questions like
- What are the possible threats in terms of ip spoofing, dns cache
poisoning? (are there any solutions in terms of PKI (PGP) or similar
discussed somewhere?)
- If I need t
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:57:37PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Hi. Thanks for this.
>
> * Name: Stephen Keeling
> * Company: TopQuark Software & Services Consulting Ltd.
> * Address: see homepage.
> * Phone: (403) 245-2939
> * Fax: N/A
> * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL: http://www
And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
> I need a tool that does the following work:
> checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
> verify the digital signature and decrypts the mail;
> parse the body;
> executes 1 or more action (completely customizzable);
> delete (archives) the mai
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:12:59PM +0100, Erik Hjelmås wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've spent a few hours searching, what Im looking for is a discussion
> of different security aspects of apt, questions like
> - What are the possible threats in terms of ip spoofing, dns cache
> poisoning? (are there any solu
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 06:19:28PM +0100, Horst Pflugstaedt wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:12:59PM +0100, Erik Hjelm?s wrote:
> > I've spent a few hours searching, what Im looking for is a discussion
> > of different security aspects of apt, questions like
> > - What are the possible threats
Erik Hjelmås wrote:
> any pointers to material which may be relevant are greatly appreciated
Check out [1]. Might be what you're interested in.
[1]. http://monk.debian.net/apt-secure/
--
Alf B Lervåg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Incoming from Jonas J Linde:
> And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
> > I need a tool that does the following work:
> > checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
So, IMAP is the wrong answer.
> > verify the digital signature and decrypts the mail;
GnuPG
> > parse the body;
pro
On 20.01.2004, at 10:31, Chris Morris wrote:
Safe mode would certainly have reduced the impact from that script, and
I'd definitely recommend turning it on unless you're very confident of
the quality of all your scripts.
There's also:
- register_globals off (its on by default PHP < 4.2, like in woo
/ 2004-01-25 11:06:08 -0700
\ s. keeling:
> > This sounds like an ideal job for the combination of the rather
> > appropriately named tools fetchmail and procmail, which - to no big
> > surprise - are suitable to fetch and process mail.
>
> Agreed. Add on gnupg for signature verification and decr
-Original Message-
From: "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:06:08 -0700
Subject: Re: Mail processing tool
> Incoming from Jonas J Linde:
> > And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
> > > I need a tool that does the following wor
And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
> From: "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Incoming from Jonas J Linde:
>> > And [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke unto the world. And said:
>> > > I need a tool that does the following work:
>> > > checks for new mail in a maibox via pop3;
>> ...
>> pro
Jonas J Linde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Procmail is a big tool, I need something different: small, reliable,
>> secure.
>
> Big? The gzipped source tar ball is 227kB. If you want something that
> processes mail in a fully customizable way I'm pretty sure you won't find
> anything much smalle
Quoting Jonas J Linde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Never had any trouble with fetchmail except if setup badly; eg. with
> different programs accessing the same mail box but using different
> locking schemes.
Fetchmail's a useful tool, but it does require running a local MTA as an
inherent part of its d
* Rick Moen [Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:41:11 -0800]:
> Fetchmail's a useful tool, but it does require running a local MTA as an
> inherent part of its design. (It does that instead of, itself, having
> code to support mail stores.)
$ apt-cache show fetchmail | grep -i suggests
$ man fetchmail
Quoting Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Am I missing something?
http://www.catb.org/~esr/fetchmail/ includes:
"Fetchmail retrieves mail from remote mail servers and forwards it
via SMTP"
--
Cheers,
Rick Moen "vi is my shepherd; I shall not font."
[EMAIL PROT
* Rick Moen [Sun, 25 Jan 2004 17:53:58 -0800]:
> Quoting Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Am I missing something?
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/fetchmail/ includes:
>"Fetchmail retrieves mail from remote mail servers and forwards it
>via SMTP"
fetchmail(1) includes:
-
Quoting Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> fetchmail(1) includes:
>
>-m | --mda
> (Keyword: mda) You can force mail to be passed to an MDA
> directly (rather than forwarded to port 25) with the --mda or -m
> option. To avoid losin
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 05:41:11PM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Jonas J Linde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Never had any trouble with fetchmail except if setup badly; eg. with
> > different programs accessing the same mail box but using different
> > locking schemes.
>
> Fetchmail's a useful t
-Original Message-
From: Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:00:36 +0100
Subject: Re: Mail processing tool
> Jonas J Linde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Procmail is a big tool, I need something different: small, reliable,
> >> secure.
43 matches
Mail list logo
