ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread System Attendant
eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): debian-security@lists.debian.org Rule/Policy: Sexual Discrimination Action: Quarantine to D:\Trend\Quarantin

ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread System Attendant
eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED];debian-security@lists.debian.org Rule/Policy: Sexual Discrimination Action: Quarantine to

Re: ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread Thomas Horsten
Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently from several different senders? On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, System Attendant wrote: > eManager Notification * > > The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. > > Source

Re: Debian Stable server hacked

2003-08-30 Thread Adam Majer
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:32:27AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:23:30PM +0200, Adam ENDRODI wrote: > > > > You don't need an executable stack to get control of execution, you only > > > need to be able to change the instruction pointer, which is stored on > > > the sta

Re: 2.4.21 IPSEC problems

2003-08-30 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Herbert Xu wrote: > John Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I haven't been able to get Linux to send any ESP packets at all yet. > Your setkey command is probably incompatible with your kernel. > > Try recompiling setkey from the upstream source. If you use the > Debian sou

Re: ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote: > Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently > from several different senders? > Bear in mind that tese message could simply be a result of spam. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of d

Re: Eric Allman has changed jobs

2003-08-30 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:37:14PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > His autoresponder was replying to a forged message. Not a thing he > could do about it. Which is a great reason not to use autoresponders. At all. Either the message was received, in which case there is no need to have an aut

loggin with iptables, syslog problem

2003-08-30 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Hello, I have the following entry: LOGall -- anywhere anywhere limit: avg 3/hour burst 5 LOG level debug prefix `IPT INPUT packet died: ' and the following thing in syslog.conf ahmed:/var/log# grep kern /etc/syslog.conf kern.* -/var/log/

KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
ey all, I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. When i use KerberosV then i do so: auth requisite pam_securetty.so auth requisite pam_nologin.so auth required pam_env.so auth sufficient pam_krb5.so a

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
On Samstag, 30. August 2003 23:06, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > ey all, > > I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP > and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. > > When i use KerberosV then i do so: > auth requisite pam_securetty.so > auth requisite

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Stephen Frost
* Matthijs Mohlmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP > and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. [...] > Now i want this together. But i don't know how. I've read the > documentation from PAM but i don't get it. >

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 23:37, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: > On Samstag, 30. August 2003 23:06, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > > ey all, > > > > I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP > > and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. > > > > When i use KerberosV th

Re: 2.4.21 IPSEC problems

2003-08-30 Thread Herbert Xu
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Herbert, it would be a Very Good Thing if Debian sarge shipped IPSEC ready > to go out-of-the-box (provided one installed the correct packages and > configured them, I suppose). > > Are we at that stage yet? What is needed to get IPSEC a

ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread System Attendant
eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rule/Policy: Sexual Discrimination Action: Quarantine to D:\Trend\Quarantine\2003-08-30\11

ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread System Attendant
eManager Notification * The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. Source mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rule/Policy: Sexual Discrimination Action: Quarantine to D:\Trend\Quaran

Re: ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matchedand action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread Thomas Horsten
Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently from several different senders? On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, System Attendant wrote: > eManager Notification * > > The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content. > > Source

Re: Debian Stable server hacked

2003-08-30 Thread Adam Majer
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:32:27AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:23:30PM +0200, Adam ENDRODI wrote: > > > > You don't need an executable stack to get control of execution, you only > > > need to be able to change the instruction pointer, which is stored on > > > the sta

Re: 2.4.21 IPSEC problems

2003-08-30 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Herbert Xu wrote: > John Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I haven't been able to get Linux to send any ESP packets at all yet. > Your setkey command is probably incompatible with your kernel. > > Try recompiling setkey from the upstream source. If you use the > Debian sou

Re: ScanMail Message to recipient: eManager settings were matched and action was taken.

2003-08-30 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Thomas Horsten wrote: > Who are mpuk and why are they censoring debian's mailing list, apparently > from several different senders? > Bear in mind that tese message could simply be a result of spam. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of d

Re: Eric Allman has changed jobs

2003-08-30 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:37:14PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > His autoresponder was replying to a forged message. Not a thing he > could do about it. Which is a great reason not to use autoresponders. At all. Either the message was received, in which case there is no need to have an aut

loggin with iptables, syslog problem

2003-08-30 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Hello, I have the following entry: LOGall -- anywhere anywhere limit: avg 3/hour burst 5 LOG level debug prefix `IPT INPUT packet died: ' and the following thing in syslog.conf ahmed:/var/log# grep kern /etc/syslog.conf kern.* -/var/log/

KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
ey all, I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. When i use KerberosV then i do so: auth requisite pam_securetty.so auth requisite pam_nologin.so auth required pam_env.so auth sufficient pam_krb5.so a

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
On Samstag, 30. August 2003 23:06, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > ey all, > > I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP > and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. > > When i use KerberosV then i do so: > auth requisite pam_securetty.so > auth requisite

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Stephen Frost
* Matthijs Mohlmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP > and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. [...] > Now i want this together. But i don't know how. I've read the > documentation from PAM but i don't get it. >

Re: KerberosV OpenLDAP and PAM

2003-08-30 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 23:37, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: > On Samstag, 30. August 2003 23:06, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > > ey all, > > > > I use for authentication KerberosV. For all types of data i use OpenLDAP > > and for login on into a computer on a network i use PAM. > > > > When i use KerberosV th