Re: Re[2]: Chkrootkit

2003-04-27 Thread Adam ENDRODI
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 07:32:01PM +0200, Kay-Michael Voit wrote: > > If I understand promisc mode, this is not a problem, so I can't fix > it, so there will always be output (which I dont want, because cron > sends a mail then) Promiscuous mode is a sign of a running sniffer. Not necessarily an

Re: Secure remote syslogging?

2003-04-27 Thread Adam ENDRODI
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:52:10PM +0200, Jose Luis Domingo Lopez wrote: > > The implementation consisted in syslog-ng logging to a pipe (using a > template for "SQL output"), which is depleted from an ever running PERL > script that executes the SQL sentences in the remote server through a > secu

Re: [OT] Re: unsubscribe - Procmail Rule

2003-04-27 Thread Tim Nicholas
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 10:55:15PM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: > Can anynone enlighten me why my rule didn't catch this message? > > :0 > * ^X-Mailing-List:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > * ^Subject: .{0,2}sub.{1,5}ibe > /dev/null You might have to escape the { and }. * ^Subject: .\{0,2\}sub.\{1,5\}ib

Re: Interesting iptables

2003-04-27 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Hanasaki JiJi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030419 08:40]: > The below two sets of rules seem to provide the same functionality, with > the excpetion that the second ruleset results in a timeout from the > 192.168.1.2 timing out on connections to some, only some, external hosts > on port 25. What coul

is this a mistake? i ywdaha3ak

2003-04-27 Thread Aaron Wood
Erase your email record here.

Re: Snort signature download script

2003-04-27 Thread Kristof Goossens
On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 12:52:58PM +0200, Konstantin Filtschew wrote: > hi, > > there is a signature download script posted on > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=173254 > > from http://www.xssass.be > > I tried it, but he tells me, that the md5 checksum is wrong > > you can down

Re: is this a mistake?

2003-04-27 Thread Grzegorz Kusnierz
yeah... it seems like a mistake indeed. :/

Re: [OT] Re: unsubscribe - Procmail Rule

2003-04-27 Thread Janne Nikula
* Tim Nicholas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 10:55:15PM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister wrote: > > Can anynone enlighten me why my rule didn't catch this message? > > > > :0 > > * ^X-Mailing-List:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > * ^Subject: .{0,2}sub.{1,5}ibe > > /dev/null > > You might hav

Re: is this a mistake? i ywdaha3ak

2003-04-27 Thread Kay-Michael Voit
is what what? i cannot see anything, only an unloadable and linked image... is this a spam mail? if not, please do not send such mails but plaintext AW> Erase your email record here. AW> -- AW> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] AW> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Re[6]: Chkrootkit

2003-04-27 Thread Kay-Michael Voit
AE> Sorry, I see now. This case, the proper solution would be fixing AE> the program which emits the incorrect warning, isn't it? the program is chrootkit, isn't it? -- Public Key erhältlich auf den PGP-Keyservern, sowie mit weiteren Informationen auf http:\\www.voits.net. Fingerprint: 9b482c5c

subscribe

2003-04-27 Thread jeroen