[Provide.Net] virus notification

2003-04-15 Thread Provide.Net Virus Scanner
--- This e-mail is generated by mail.provide.net to warn you that the e-mail sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] to debian-security@lists.debian.org is infected with virus: Win32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please contact your system administrator for further information. If you are the sender

Re: unsubscribe

2003-04-15 Thread Sébastien
Le Mardi 15 Avril 2003 03:49, Phil Pettis a écrit : To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] it's [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sebbb

unsubscribe

2003-04-15 Thread Fitzner, Michael
Mit freundlichen Grüßen Michael Fitzner System-Administration Jamba! AG Pfuelstrasse 5 10997 Berlin Tel.: +49-30-69538-151 Fax: +49-30-69538-599 EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: unsubscribe

2003-04-15 Thread Laurent Luyckx
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 09:59, Fitzner, Michael wrote: > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > > Michael Fitzner > System-Administration > > Jamba! AG > Pfuelstrasse 5 > 10997 Berlin > Tel.: +49-30-69538-151 > Fax: +49-30-69538-599 > > EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: unsubscribe

2003-04-15 Thread Matthias Kestenholz
* Laurent Luyckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 09:59, Fitzner, Michael wrote: > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > > > > Michael Fitzner > > System-Administration > > > > Jamba! AG > > Pfuelstrasse 5 > > 10997 Berlin > > Tel.: +49-30-

spam block

2003-04-15 Thread Konstantin
hi, I need a spam filter, but I need one which works with sendmail and is not spamassasin(the system needs an old perl 5.0.X), but spamassasin needs perl >5.6 any ideas, which spam filter I can use on such a system. thx for help Konstantin

Re: spam block

2003-04-15 Thread Celso González
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 02:47:52PM +0200, Konstantin wrote: > hi, > > I need a spam filter, but I need one which works with sendmail and is not > spamassasin(the system needs an old perl 5.0.X), but spamassasin needs perl > >5.6 > > any ideas, which spam filter I can use on such a system. Try wi

Re: spam block

2003-04-15 Thread Cesar Rincon
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 08:58, Celso González wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 02:47:52PM +0200, Konstantin wrote: > > hi, > > > > I need a spam filter, but I need one which works with sendmail and is not > > spamassasin(the system needs an old perl 5.0.X), but spamassasin needs perl > > >5.6 > > >

Re: spam block

2003-04-15 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 02:47:52PM +0200, Konstantin wrote: > I need a spam filter, but I need one which works with sendmail and is > not spamassasin(the system needs an old perl 5.0.X), but spamassasin > needs perl 5.6 When I set up spamassassin on a potato system, I installed perl from source wi

unsubscribe

2003-04-15 Thread Gerd Terlutter
__ UNICEF bittet um Spenden fur die Kinder im Irak! Hier online an UNICEF spenden: https://spenden.web.de/unicef/special/?mc=021101

Re: spam block

2003-04-15 Thread Ted Cabeen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Konstantin" writes: >hi, > >I need a spam filter, but I need one which works with sendmail and is not >spamassasin(the system needs an old perl 5.0.X), but spamassasin needs p

Re: spam block

2003-04-15 Thread Jay Kline
If you have a spare box, you can run spamassissin's spamd and connect remotely. Jay On Tuesday 15 April 2003 7:47 am, Konstantin wrote: > hi, > > I need a spam filter, but I need one which works with sendmail and is not > spamassasin(the system needs an old perl 5.0.X), but spamassasin needs per

cfengine client behind NAT

2003-04-15 Thread Ivo Marino
Hello folks, I'm running cfengine on two different systems which aren't connected to the same network but comunicate via Internet. Host A cfengine client system behind NAT Host B cfd server system public IP Actually I'm experiencing some a

Re: Kernel ptrace Hole - Fix For i386 ?

2003-04-15 Thread Nick Boyce
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 20:01:57 -0500, Greg Norris wrote: >On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:46:38AM +0100, Nick Boyce wrote: >> The fix is in vanilla kernel 2.4.20 as I understand it, and it sounds >> like some people here are downloading that source for their Woody i386 >> systems. > >By "vanilla", do you