On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 22:14:58 -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> And on occasion I see this as well.
>
> [Mon Feb 3 06:25:11 2003] [notice] SIGUSR1 received. Doing graceful
> restart
Given the time, I'd guess that this is /etc/cron.daily/logrotate's execution
of the postrotate part of /etc/logrotate
Is this machine doing webmail by any chance?
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:14:58 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Apache-ssl 1.3.26.1+1.48-0woody3 and openssl 0.9.6c-2.woody.1.
>
> On a daily basis I am seeing the following errors.
>
> [Wed Feb 5 10:00:03 2003] [notice] child
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:09:34AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have setup a firewall with 4 legs as follows:
> * One leg goes to the router (cisco).
> * Second leg goes to a switch connected to the internal network
> (10.20...).
> * The third and fourt
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:56:42AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:14:50AM -0500, merk0020 wrote:
> > Hello I am about to make the Proxy/Firewall on your
> > www.aboutdebian.com web site. I was wondering how to go about testing
> > it when finished. I have multiple comp
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:09:34AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Now, since the firewall is the most critical host, I want to setup some
> kind of failsafe, so even if that host dies all the traffic will go
> through another host.
>
> Since I don't even have an idea where to start, I'll appreciat
Thx for the pointers on finding the insecure pormmail.pl
An other problem:
Forms sent on a webpage always have [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if www-data is
the user in httpd.conf)as return path. How do I change this, or how can
I set this to the "from"-field of the form? I tried on setting a
different user o
heya thomas,
assuming you mean exclusively filesystem acls, acl support is
there... kind of. for ext2/ext3, there's a kernel-patch package
you can use to build your own kernel quite easily the Debian Way
with make-kpkg.
the trouble is stuff you already hinted at, and a little more. for ext2
and
The posix acl mentiond are at
http://acl.bestbits.at/mailman/listinfo/acl-devel.
And Samba from testing uses these ACLs for NT ACL. kind of at least, there
are not the same.
I installed the acl on a non-prod system with Dual Processor without
problems.
Perhaps the fileutil package is needed in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I need some advice for this decision:
We are about to replace our existing watchguard firebox II. There has
been a decision for a hardware device which I cannot alter. But with
all the VPN interop problems we had with the watchguard products I
am
Quoting sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> assuming you mean exclusively filesystem acls, acl support is
> there... kind of. for ext2/ext3, there's a kernel-patch package
> you can use to build your own kernel quite easily the Debian Way
> with make-kpkg.
>
> the trouble is stuff you already hin
UNSUBSCRIBE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit http://www.grammy.ru !!!
-Original Message-
From: Rick Moen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 5:41 PM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ACLs
Quoting sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> assuming you mean e
thanx everybody, there are some interesting links here.
Bye
--
Haim
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:14:58PM -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> [Wed Feb 5 10:00:03 2003] [notice] child pid 3751 exit signal Segmentation
> fault (11)
> [Wed Feb 5 11:30:02 2003] [notice] child pid 3747 exit signal Segmentation
> fault (11)
> [Wed Feb 5 14:00:03 2003] [notice] child pid 3748 exi
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
Hi
I have setup a firewall with 4 legs as follows:
* One leg goes to the router (cisco).
* Second leg goes to a switch connected to the internal network
(10.20...).
* The third and fourth legs are both for the dmz. one goes to a
s
Marcel Weber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I need some advice for this decision:
We are about to replace our existing watchguard firebox II. There has
been a decision for a hardware device which I cannot alter. But with
all the VPN interop problems we had with the wat
Is this machine doing webmail by any chance?
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:14:58 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Apache-ssl 1.3.26.1+1.48-0woody3 and openssl 0.9.6c-2.woody.1.
>
> On a daily basis I am seeing the following errors.
>
> [Wed Feb 5 10:00:03 2003] [notice] child
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:09:34AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have setup a firewall with 4 legs as follows:
> * One leg goes to the router (cisco).
> * Second leg goes to a switch connected to the internal network
> (10.20...).
> * The third and fourt
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:56:42AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:14:50AM -0500, merk0020 wrote:
> > Hello I am about to make the Proxy/Firewall on your
> > www.aboutdebian.com web site. I was wondering how to go about testing
> > it when finished. I have multiple comp
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:09:34AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Now, since the firewall is the most critical host, I want to setup some
> kind of failsafe, so even if that host dies all the traffic will go
> through another host.
>
> Since I don't even have an idea where to start, I'll appreciat
Thx for the pointers on finding the insecure pormmail.pl
An other problem:
Forms sent on a webpage always have www-data@maindomain (if www-data is
the user in httpd.conf)as return path. How do I change this, or how can
I set this to the "from"-field of the form? I tried on setting a
different user
heya thomas,
assuming you mean exclusively filesystem acls, acl support is
there... kind of. for ext2/ext3, there's a kernel-patch package
you can use to build your own kernel quite easily the Debian Way
with make-kpkg.
the trouble is stuff you already hinted at, and a little more. for ext2
and
The posix acl mentiond are at
http://acl.bestbits.at/mailman/listinfo/acl-devel.
And Samba from testing uses these ACLs for NT ACL. kind of at least, there
are not the same.
I installed the acl on a non-prod system with Dual Processor without
problems.
Perhaps the fileutil package is needed in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I need some advice for this decision:
We are about to replace our existing watchguard firebox II. There has
been a decision for a hardware device which I cannot alter. But with
all the VPN interop problems we had with the watchguard products I
am
Quoting sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> assuming you mean exclusively filesystem acls, acl support is
> there... kind of. for ext2/ext3, there's a kernel-patch package
> you can use to build your own kernel quite easily the Debian Way
> with make-kpkg.
>
> the trouble is stuff you already hin
UNSUBSCRIBE *@gorod.ru
or visit http://www.grammy.ru !!!
-Original Message-
From: Rick Moen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 5:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ACLs
Quoting sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> assuming you mean exclusively filesystem
thanx everybody, there are some interesting links here.
Bye
--
Haim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:14:58PM -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> [Wed Feb 5 10:00:03 2003] [notice] child pid 3751 exit signal Segmentation
> fault (11)
> [Wed Feb 5 11:30:02 2003] [notice] child pid 3747 exit signal Segmentation
> fault (11)
> [Wed Feb 5 14:00:03 2003] [notice] child pid 3748 exi
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
Hi
I have setup a firewall with 4 legs as follows:
* One leg goes to the router (cisco).
* Second leg goes to a switch connected to the internal network
(10.20...).
* The third and fourth legs are both for the dmz. one goes to a
sw
Marcel Weber wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I need some advice for this decision:
We are about to replace our existing watchguard firebox II. There has
been a decision for a hardware device which I cannot alter. But with
all the VPN interop problems we had with the watc
29 matches
Mail list logo
