fswcert

hi all ! the "fswcert" tool, which is used to extract private key from certificate was before in freeswan package. I was not able to find it in 1.95 version of freeswan. Anyone knows why it has been removed ??? victor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: NEOMAIL - as big kev in OZ would say, IM EXCITED !

Dear Ernie Miller, I'm forwarding you this piece of spam that was recently sent to debian-security mailing list. It is also archived at . Being unable to find a Marcel Welschbillig listed on your SourceForg

Re: A question about some network services

Ühel ilusal päeval [02.04.2002] kirjutas Anne Carasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [skip] > I usually turn off inetd completely. It helps makes things > quieter on a nessus scan :) Hei! How do you do that? I tried the following... juku:~# dpkg -l | grep inetd ii netkit-inetd 0.10-9 The Int

Re: A question about some network services

On Friday 05 April 2002 08:49 am, Juhan Kundla wrote: > How do you do that? I tried the following... Not remove- but not start. Remove all references to it from the /etc/rc*.d/ directorys so that it dosnt start up anymore. If you are not useing any of its services, its pointless to have it

Re: A question about some network services

> Yikes! I guess, you didn't remove inetd that way, right? But how then? I think that you should just turn it off :) 'Don't' use isn't equal to 'wipe it out' > Namarie! > Juku -- Michael "carstein" Melewski | "One day, he said, in a taped segment [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: A question about some network services

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:31:19PM +0200, Michal Melewski remarked: > > Yikes! I guess, you didn't remove inetd that way, right? But how then? > I think that you should just turn it off :) > 'Don't' use isn't equal to 'wipe it out' I have found the 'rcconf' utility to be very helpful in the

Re: A question about some network services

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 08:28:41AM -0600, Jay Kline wrote: > On Friday 05 April 2002 08:49 am, Juhan Kundla wrote: > > > How do you do that? I tried the following... > > Not remove- but not start. Remove all references to it from the /etc/rc*.d/ > directorys so that it dosnt start up anymore.

Re: NEOMAIL - as big kev in OZ would say, IM EXCITED !

Andrew, The NeoMail project's only member is me. I have nothing to do with this guy, and though I'm happy he's happy with NeoMail, this is clearly inappropriate behavior. I'm copying this mail to the perpetrator address as listed in your forward, so he understands that I don't encourage thi

Re: A question about some network services

Generally, I just disable the inetd script from the /etc/init.d directory. You never know if you're going to need it. Removing the package is definitely not the same as disabling it. Michal is right: disable <> wipe it out :) -Anne On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:31:19PM +0200, Michal Melewski wrot

Re: A question about some network services

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:49:46PM +0200, Juhan Kundla wrote: > > Yikes! I guess, you didn't remove inetd that way, right? But how then? > As root: /etc/init.d/inetd stop rm /etc/rc?.d/S??inetd It will not be started again, but the K??inetd links will still be in place so the next upgrade won'

Re: A question about some network services

Hmm, I don't understand this discussion about disabling inetd it has it's uses. Just fire up your favourite text editor pointed at /etc/inetd.conf and insert a hashmark # in front of every line for a service you don't want to provide to the public. Best Rgards /Karl "Noah L. Meyerhans" wr

Re: A question about some network services

It only has it's uses if you are running any services through it. If you are going to # out all the services in /etc/inetd.conf, why not just shut inetd down alltogether? Seems logical to me. Mark Karl Breitner wrote: > Hmm, I don't understand this discussion about disabling inetd > it has it

Re: A question about some network services

You are perfectly right Mark, when commenting out all services that is. still I prefer to keep it running with a minimum of services enabled. /Karl Mark Drummond skrev: > It only has it's uses if you are running any services through it. If you > are going to # out all the services in /etc/i

Re: on potato's proftpd

On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:24:18PM +, Martin WHEELER wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:22:34AM +, Martin WHEELER wrote: > > "Release early; release often." > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Petro wrote: > > > > NO > > > > Measure twice, cut once. > > Fine. You wear the same size suit fr

Re: what's that?

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Kirill Zverev wrote: > I found that in my logs: > > Apr 4 06:25:01 cmss su[30315]: + ??? root-nobody > Apr 4 06:25:01 cmss PAM_unix[30315]: (su) session opened for user nobody by > (uid=0) > > who could use su at six o'clock in the morning? from /etc/crontab: # m h

Re: what's that?

On 2002-04-05 11:21:39, Kirill Zverev wrote: > Apr 4 06:25:01 cmss su[30315]: + ??? root-nobody > Apr 4 06:25:01 cmss PAM_unix[30315]: (su) session opened for user nobody by > (uid=0) > > who could use su at six o'clock in the morning? cron, possibly /etc/cron.daily/find: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: what's that?

Logrotate is a good candidate, that's what I found when looking at top output. /Karl Kirill Zverev skrev: > Hi! > > I found that in my logs: > > Apr 4 06:25:01 cmss su[30315]: + ??? root-nobody > Apr 4 06:25:01 cmss PAM_unix[30315]: (su) session opened for user nobody by > (uid=0) > > wh

*****SPAM***** (±¤°í)´ç½ÅÀ» ¹é¸¸ÀåÀÚŬ·´¿¡ ÃÊ´ëÇÕ´Ï´Ù...

   http://nancho.starhana.com";>http://myhome.hananet.net/~nannaya77/js/don1.js";> http://nancho.starhana.com"; target=_blank>http://starhana.com/images/mtima1.jpg"; border=0 width="134" height="114">http://starhana.com/images/mtima2.gif"; border=0 width="146"

*****SPAM***** (±¤°í)´ç½ÅÀ» ¹é¸¸ÀåÀÚŬ·´¿¡ ÃÊ´ëÇÕ´Ï´Ù...

   http://nancho.starhana.com";>http://myhome.hananet.net/~nannaya77/js/don1.js";> http://nancho.starhana.com"; target=_blank>http://starhana.com/images/mtima1.jpg"; border=0 width="134" height="114">http://starhana.com/images/mtima2.gif"; border=0 width="146"

fswcert

hi all ! the "fswcert" tool, which is used to extract private key from certificate was before in freeswan package. I was not able to find it in 1.95 version of freeswan. Anyone knows why it has been removed ??? victor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: NEOMAIL - as big kev in OZ would say, IM EXCITED !

Dear Ernie Miller, I'm forwarding you this piece of spam that was recently sent to debian-security mailing list. It is also archived at . Being unable to find a Marcel Welschbillig listed on your SourceForge

Re: A question about some network services

Ühel ilusal päeval [02.04.2002] kirjutas Anne Carasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [skip] > I usually turn off inetd completely. It helps makes things > quieter on a nessus scan :) Hei! How do you do that? I tried the following... juku:~# dpkg -l | grep inetd ii netkit-inetd 0.10-9 The Inte

Re: A question about some network services

On Friday 05 April 2002 08:49 am, Juhan Kundla wrote: > How do you do that? I tried the following... Not remove- but not start. Remove all references to it from the /etc/rc*.d/ directorys so that it dosnt start up anymore. If you are not useing any of its services, its pointless to have it r

Re: A question about some network services

> Yikes! I guess, you didn't remove inetd that way, right? But how then? I think that you should just turn it off :) 'Don't' use isn't equal to 'wipe it out' > Namarie! > Juku -- Michael "carstein" Melewski | "One day, he said, in a taped segment [EMAIL PROTECTED]|

Re: A question about some network services

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:31:19PM +0200, Michal Melewski remarked: > > Yikes! I guess, you didn't remove inetd that way, right? But how then? > I think that you should just turn it off :) > 'Don't' use isn't equal to 'wipe it out' I have found the 'rcconf' utility to be very helpful in thes

Re: A question about some network services

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 08:28:41AM -0600, Jay Kline wrote: > On Friday 05 April 2002 08:49 am, Juhan Kundla wrote: > > > How do you do that? I tried the following... > > Not remove- but not start. Remove all references to it from the /etc/rc*.d/ > directorys so that it dosnt start up anymore.

Re: NEOMAIL - as big kev in OZ would say, IM EXCITED !

Andrew, The NeoMail project's only member is me. I have nothing to do with this guy, and though I'm happy he's happy with NeoMail, this is clearly inappropriate behavior. I'm copying this mail to the perpetrator address as listed in your forward, so he understands that I don't encourage this

Re: A question about some network services

Generally, I just disable the inetd script from the /etc/init.d directory. You never know if you're going to need it. Removing the package is definitely not the same as disabling it. Michal is right: disable <> wipe it out :) -Anne On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:31:19PM +0200, Michal Melewski wrote

Re: A question about some network services

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:49:46PM +0200, Juhan Kundla wrote: > > Yikes! I guess, you didn't remove inetd that way, right? But how then? > As root: /etc/init.d/inetd stop rm /etc/rc?.d/S??inetd It will not be started again, but the K??inetd links will still be in place so the next upgrade won't

Re: A question about some network services

Hmm, I don't understand this discussion about disabling inetd it has it's uses. Just fire up your favourite text editor pointed at /etc/inetd.conf and insert a hashmark # in front of every line for a service you don't want to provide to the public. Best Rgards /Karl "Noah L. Meyerhans" wro

Re: A question about some network services

It only has it's uses if you are running any services through it. If you are going to # out all the services in /etc/inetd.conf, why not just shut inetd down alltogether? Seems logical to me. Mark Karl Breitner wrote: Hmm, I don't understand this discussion about disabling inetd it has it's

Re: A question about some network services

You are perfectly right Mark, when commenting out all services that is. still I prefer to keep it running with a minimum of services enabled. /Karl Mark Drummond skrev: > It only has it's uses if you are running any services through it. If you > are going to # out all the services in /etc/in

Re: on potato's proftpd

On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:24:18PM +, Martin WHEELER wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:22:34AM +, Martin WHEELER wrote: > > "Release early; release often." > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Petro wrote: > > > > NO > > > > Measure twice, cut once. > > Fine. You wear the same size suit fro