Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

In my opinion You will have a nat support the cisco router give tou a standart TCP/IP adresse on an ethernet netwrk. Debian computer will not use PPP over ATM, it is th router who will do that. But I'm not sure. On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 08:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm abou

Encrypted Ethernet ?

Hello! Does someone know, if there is a solution to use Debian (or, in general Linux ) as encryptor for Ethernet ? I'd like to use two computers connected by unsafe ethernet as secure tunnel between two LANs. It means, that such device have to be transparent for all IP traffic (or may

unsubscribe

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Encrypted Ethernet ?

On Thursday 21 February 2002 11.22, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote: > Hello! > > Does someone know, if there is a solution to use Debian (or, in general > Linux ) as encryptor for Ethernet ? I'd like to use two computers connected > by unsafe ethernet as secure tunnel between two LANs. It means, that

Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

Hello, The adsl protocol is based on ATM anyhow. ATM cells leave the CPE (the thing which have the phone line in) to reach the local DSLAM which aggregare multiple client and then goes in a WAN which may be quite a lot of things. The question to know if you have to run pppoe or pppoatm is to know

Re: Encrypted Ethernet ?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:22:14AM +0100, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote: > Does someone know, if there is a solution to use Debian (or, > in general Linux ) as encryptor for Ethernet ? I'd like to use two > computers connected by unsafe ethernet as secure tunnel between two > LANs. It means, that s

Re: Encrypted Ethernet ?

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote: > Does someone know, if there is a solution to use Debian (or, in > general Linux ) as encryptor for Ethernet ? I'd like to use two > computers connected by unsafe ethernet as secure tunnel between two > LANs. It means, that such device have to be

[±¤ °í] Çؿܱ³Æ÷µéÀÇ Çѱ¹½ÄÇ° Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθô

Title: :+: ÇѺ£ÀÌ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏ :+: + Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã¸é ¹Ù·Î ÀúÈñ ÀÚ·á¿¡¼­ ±ÍÇÏÀÇ À̸ÞÀÏ ÁÖ¼Ò°¡

RE: Encrypted Ethernet ?

Does anyone have a howto/documentation for getting any of those you listed to work quickly between two systems? - James > -Original Message- > From: tony@bach [mailto:tony@bach] On Behalf Of tony mancill > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:30 AM > To: Jaroslaw Tabor > Cc: [EMAIL PROTE

Squid HTTP Proxy Security Update

Is the Squid Version 2.2.STABLE5 on Debian potato vulnerable? If it is we need the new package with patches applied. -- All my regards, Philipe Gaspar --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 __

Re: Squid HTTP Proxy Security Update

Previously Philipe Gaspar wrote: > Is the Squid Version 2.2.STABLE5 on Debian potato vulnerable? No. Wichert. -- _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.lia

Re: Encrypted Ethernet ?

"James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone have a howto/documentation for getting any of those you > listed to work quickly between two systems? Some of these might help:

Re: Squid HTTP Proxy Security Update

Um, want to bet? (All right, its not vunerable to anything but the SNMP DoS, and that's disabled by default) However I am yet to actually see 2.2.5-4 avaliable via apt-get :-\ Changes: squid (2.2.5-4) stable; urgency=medium . * Upload to address the problems as identified in the 2.4 series.

PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

I'm about to turn to ADSL connection to Internet and I'm taking in consideration all the choises the Provider offer. I was surprised in seening they offer an ADSL service not only using the PPP-over-Eth protocol, but also with the PPP-over-ATM. So my question is: if I choose the second system, is d

Re: syslog messages

> I have checked this and i am running the recommended version > nfs-common_0.1.9.1-1, also i don't see any obvious signs of access. Dose > this mean i don't need to worry about it or is there something else i > should be doing ? There is a bug in nfs-common_0.1.9.1 in Potato ( #111990 Hi, http:/

Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

In my opinion You will have a nat support the cisco router give tou a standart TCP/IP adresse on an ethernet netwrk. Debian computer will not use PPP over ATM, it is th router who will do that. But I'm not sure. On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 08:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm about

Encrypted Ethernet ?

Hello! Does someone know, if there is a solution to use Debian (or, in general Linux ) as encryptor for Ethernet ? I'd like to use two computers connected by unsafe ethernet as secure tunnel between two LANs. It means, that such device have to be transparent for all IP traffic (or may b

unsubscribe

Re: Encrypted Ethernet ?

On Thursday 21 February 2002 11.22, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote: > Hello! > > Does someone know, if there is a solution to use Debian (or, in general > Linux ) as encryptor for Ethernet ? I'd like to use two computers connected > by unsafe ethernet as secure tunnel between two LANs. It means, that s

Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

Hello, The adsl protocol is based on ATM anyhow. ATM cells leave the CPE (the thing which have the phone line in) to reach the local DSLAM which aggregare multiple client and then goes in a WAN which may be quite a lot of things. The question to know if you have to run pppoe or pppoatm is to know

Re: Encrypted Ethernet ?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:22:14AM +0100, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote: > Does someone know, if there is a solution to use Debian (or, > in general Linux ) as encryptor for Ethernet ? I'd like to use two > computers connected by unsafe ethernet as secure tunnel between two > LANs. It means, that su

Re: Encrypted Ethernet ?

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Jaroslaw Tabor wrote: > Does someone know, if there is a solution to use Debian (or, in > general Linux ) as encryptor for Ethernet ? I'd like to use two > computers connected by unsafe ethernet as secure tunnel between two > LANs. It means, that such device have to be t

[±¤ °í] Çؿܱ³Æ÷µéÀÇ Çѱ¹½ÄÇ° Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθô

Title: :+: 한베이 홍보메일 :+: + 클릭하시면 바로 저희 자료에서

RE: Encrypted Ethernet ?

Does anyone have a howto/documentation for getting any of those you listed to work quickly between two systems? - James > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tony mancill > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:30 AM > To: Jaroslaw Tabor > Cc

Squid HTTP Proxy Security Update

Is the Squid Version 2.2.STABLE5 on Debian potato vulnerable? If it is we need the new package with patches applied. -- All my regards, Philipe Gaspar --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 _

Re: Squid HTTP Proxy Security Update

Previously Philipe Gaspar wrote: > Is the Squid Version 2.2.STABLE5 on Debian potato vulnerable? No. Wichert. -- _ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.lia

Re: Encrypted Ethernet ?

"James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone have a howto/documentation for getting any of those you > listed to work quickly between two systems? Some of these might help:

Re: Squid HTTP Proxy Security Update

Um, want to bet? (All right, its not vunerable to anything but the SNMP DoS, and that's disabled by default) However I am yet to actually see 2.2.5-4 avaliable via apt-get :-\ Changes: squid (2.2.5-4) stable; urgency=medium . * Upload to address the problems as identified in the 2.4 series.