Hello,
actually the most secure pop3 server we've tried at work was qpoper. The only
problem is it's too slow for a massive use (hosting service) and we had to
write our own one. But it's still quite good, and I'd advice you to use it
fred
On Sunday 29 July 2001 22:13, Moe Harley wrote:
> Though
> I've you are using vim use:
>
> set textwidth=72
>
> in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a line
in my .muttrc that goes something like this:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 06:10:29PM +1000, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> > I've you are using vim use:
> >
> > set textwidth=72
> >
> > in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
>
> Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
> wrapping ALL documents you edi
Hi,
I need a pop3 proxy to protect a bad pop3server (Exc...ge). I founded:
popular
pop3proxy
perdition
Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I will
not have a lot of connections on it).
Thanks.
PGP signature
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I will
>not have a lot of connections on it).
www.balabit.hu/products/Zorp/
--
[-]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
** On Jul 30, Tamas TEVESZ scribbled:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
> > Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I
>will not have a lot of connections on it).
>
> www.balabit.hu/products/Zorp/
http://www.balabit.hu/en/products/Zorp/ - that
On 01-07-30 Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> > I've you are using vim use:
> > set textwidth=72
> > in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
> Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
> wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a l
Thank you everyone, I value all the comments ive been receiving on the
subject. :) However when I was referring to secure, i meant more along the
lines of "stable". I understand the pop3 protocol and know its limitations
as far as plaintext passwords are concerned, and I fully intend to take
ap
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 12:47:46PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> I'm more worried about people seeing
> my pop3 service as a potential door into my network.
See my first reply to you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 01:32:04PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Pedro Zorzenon Neto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:42:13PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> > > Do you mean this package?
> > >
> > > "Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrolers that uses PC parallel port
> >
Hello,
I've just installed snort package,
and for some reason it sends alerts to me into
/var/log/auth.log . I don't really like alerts going there,
beacuse when I look there I expect to see auth and login information,
not alerts about portscans, etc
How can I change this?
Thank you.
P.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
Hello,
[cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
>
> I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
> via popa3d. I'll attach relavent scripts...
>
> /home/user/.fetchmailrc:
> ---
> poll cogit8.org via
Dmitriy wrote:
> How can I change this?
man snort, note -s option
man syslog.conf
--
Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/
"...thats the metaphorical equivalent of flopping your wedding tackle
into a lion's mouth and flicking his lovespuds with a wet towel, pur
I was just playing around securing one of my Exchange boxes, and found that
coupling Stunnel (http://www.stunnel.org/) with your favourite mail server
works really well (not that Exchange is my pick for a secure mail server)
...
later,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Rafal Kupka" <[EMA
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:44:01PM +0200, Rafal Kupka wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
> >
> > I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
> > via popa3d. I'll attach relavent scripts...
>
In my case, I'm the only local user on this box so I'm not worried too
much. In the same case, I should store my password in my .fetchmailrc
file, but I'd rather do that than type in my password every time
fetchmail kicks up.
I would like to know how to make it more secure, however. But at
leas
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 01:54:03PM -0700, Stephen Hassard wrote:
> I was just playing around securing one of my Exchange boxes, and found that
> coupling Stunnel (http://www.stunnel.org/) with your favourite mail server
> works really well (not that Exchange is my pick for a secure mail server)
I
On Jul 30, 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> An easier way would be to use the autocmd feature of vim. I use it for
> example this way:
>
> |autocmd BufNewFile,BufReadPost reportbug*,mutt-* set textwidth=72
Actually, since vim 5.4 or so, this is even easier:
autocmd FileType mail set textwidth
Hi All.
Recently some members of my LUG were cracked on their dial-up machines.
With that in mind, I've taken it upon myself to tighten things up and
understand what the system is doing. A recuring mystery to me is some
of the services enabled/disabled in /etc/inetd.conf. In particular, how
cri
Simple rule for tightening a machine, if you don't know what it does,
disable..as for all the things you mentioned, you will be able to disable
them without a problem.
The command lsof can help with finding out what process is accessing what
ports. Also running ps -ef and looking at all the proc
hi ya nate...
to find out what is using your applications...
# fuser -muv /proc
where foo (/proc) is something that shows as running in df etc...
# lsof :port
where :port is from netstat -nr
there shouldnt be anything running that you dont know about
[On 30 Jul, 2001, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote in " Re: pop3 "]
> > PS. Please wrap your lines at 72-ish characters. Hmm. I've seen a lot
> > of mutt users with un-wrapped lines. I would've expected that from a
> > GUI mail reader like Mozilla, but not from a proper mailreader like
> > mutt.
Hello,
actually the most secure pop3 server we've tried at work was qpoper. The only
problem is it's too slow for a massive use (hosting service) and we had to
write our own one. But it's still quite good, and I'd advice you to use it
fred
On Sunday 29 July 2001 22:13, Moe Harley wrote:
> Thought
> I've you are using vim use:
>
> set textwidth=72
>
> in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a line
in my .muttrc that goes something like this:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 06:10:29PM +1000, Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> > I've you are using vim use:
> >
> > set textwidth=72
> >
> > in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
>
> Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
> wrapping ALL documents you edit
Hi,
I need a pop3 proxy to protect a bad pop3server (Exc...ge). I founded:
popular
pop3proxy
perdition
Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view (I
will not have a lot of connections on it).
Thanks.
pgp0iDprHXzWh.pgp
Description: PGP signa
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security view
> (I will not have a lot of connections on it).
www.balabit.hu/products/Zorp/
--
[-]
** On Jul 30, Tamas TEVESZ scribbled:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
>
> > Is there anyone who used some of them. What is the best from a security
> view (I will not have a lot of connections on it).
>
> www.balabit.hu/products/Zorp/
http://www.balabit.hu/en/products/Zorp/ - that
On 01-07-30 Andrew Sione Taumoefolau wrote:
> > I've you are using vim use:
> > set textwidth=72
> > in your .vimrc to wrap te lines to a max of 72 char.
> Probably better not to do it that way, unless you're okay with Vim
> wrapping ALL documents you edit with it at 72 characters. I've got a li
Thank you everyone, I value all the comments ive been receiving on the
subject. :) However when I was referring to secure, i meant more along the
lines of "stable". I understand the pop3 protocol and know its limitations
as far as plaintext passwords are concerned, and I fully intend to take
app
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 12:47:46PM -0600, Moe Harley wrote:
> I'm more worried about people seeing
> my pop3 service as a potential door into my network.
See my first reply to you
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 01:32:04PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Pedro Zorzenon Neto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:42:13PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> > > Do you mean this package?
> > >
> > > "Programmer for Atmel AVR microcontrolers that uses PC parallel port
> >
>
Hello,
I've just installed snort package,
and for some reason it sends alerts to me into
/var/log/auth.log . I don't really like alerts going there,
beacuse when I look there I expect to see auth and login information,
not alerts about portscans, etc
How can I change this?
Thank you.
P.S
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
Hello,
[cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
>
> I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
> via popa3d. I'll attach relavent scripts...
>
> /home/user/.fetchmailrc:
> ---
> poll cogit8.org via
Dmitriy wrote:
> How can I change this?
man snort, note -s option
man syslog.conf
--
Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/
"...thats the metaphorical equivalent of flopping your wedding tackle
into a lion's mouth and flicking his lovespuds with a wet towel, pure
I was just playing around securing one of my Exchange boxes, and found that
coupling Stunnel (http://www.stunnel.org/) with your favourite mail server
works really well (not that Exchange is my pick for a secure mail server)
...
later,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Rafal Kupka" <[EMAI
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 10:44:01PM +0200, Rafal Kupka wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 04:44:57PM -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [cut - about secure pop3 daemon]
> >
> > I currently have fetchmail opening up a SSH tunnel, and get my mail
> > via popa3d. I'll attach relavent scripts...
> >
In my case, I'm the only local user on this box so I'm not worried too
much. In the same case, I should store my password in my .fetchmailrc
file, but I'd rather do that than type in my password every time
fetchmail kicks up.
I would like to know how to make it more secure, however. But at
least
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 01:54:03PM -0700, Stephen Hassard wrote:
> I was just playing around securing one of my Exchange boxes, and found that
> coupling Stunnel (http://www.stunnel.org/) with your favourite mail server
> works really well (not that Exchange is my pick for a secure mail server)
In
On Jul 30, 2001, Christian Kurz wrote:
> An easier way would be to use the autocmd feature of vim. I use it for
> example this way:
>
> |autocmd BufNewFile,BufReadPost reportbug*,mutt-* set textwidth=72
Actually, since vim 5.4 or so, this is even easier:
autocmd FileType mail set textwidth=
Hi All.
Recently some members of my LUG were cracked on their dial-up machines.
With that in mind, I've taken it upon myself to tighten things up and
understand what the system is doing. A recuring mystery to me is some
of the services enabled/disabled in /etc/inetd.conf. In particular, how
crit
Simple rule for tightening a machine, if you don't know what it does,
disable..as for all the things you mentioned, you will be able to disable
them without a problem.
The command lsof can help with finding out what process is accessing what
ports. Also running ps -ef and looking at all the proce
hi ya nate...
to find out what is using your applications...
# fuser -muv /proc
where foo (/proc) is something that shows as running in df etc...
# lsof :port
where :port is from netstat -nr
there shouldnt be anything running that you dont know about
t
43 matches
Mail list logo
