Hi,
I have a Potato workstation with several services installed on it.
Thanks to links in /etc/rc?.d they start and stop automatically at
system startup/shutdown :-)
The problem is that I do not need all of them all the time - when I work
on certain subject I would like to switch other services o
Hi Piotr,
Just use one of the free runlevels (4,5 even 2). Go to
/etc/rc and remove the links that you don't need and add the
ones you do. After that you can switch to that runlevel bij doing telinit
. All your services will be started and stopped for that
runlevel.
Good luck,
Eelco van Beek
O
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:16:13AM +0100, IC&S - Eelco van Beek wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
> Just use one of the free runlevels (4,5 even 2). Go to
> /etc/rc and remove the links that you don't need and add the
> ones you do. After that you can switch to that runlevel bij doing telinit
> . All your service
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Mark Suter wrote:
> The only way under IPv4 be safe from spoofing is for everyone to
> implement proper Network Ingress Filtering [RFC2827, BCP0038] on
> their networks. Please, read this RFC.
>
> http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc2827.txt
bah. all this talk about portsentry b
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:33:03PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
[]
> bah. all this talk about portsentry being dangerous forgets that you can
> also run it so it only triggers after a full TCP connect. while not
> un-spoofable, it's very hard for an attacker to spoof as they have to be
> in-lin
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Tim Haynes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:33:03PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
>
> > bah. all this talk about portsentry being dangerous forgets that you can
> > also run it so it only triggers after a full TCP connect. while not
> > un-spoofable, it's very hard for an
Piotr Tarnowski wrote:
> What I did looks very tricky - I would prefer something similar to
> putting '#' in front of line in /etc/inittab.
Install file-rc. This will replace all those links with one configfile
(/etc/runlevel.conf). Put a '#' in front of lines in /etc/runlevel.conf.
--
/"\
Quoting Jürgen Dollinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Piotr Tarnowski wrote:
> > What I did looks very tricky - I would prefer something similar to
> > putting '#' in front of line in /etc/inittab.
>
> Install file-rc. This will replace all those links with one configfile
> (/etc/runlevel.conf). Put a '
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:59:39 +, David Wright said:
> Quoting Jürgen Dollinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Piotr Tarnowski wrote:
> > > What I did looks very tricky - I would prefer something similar to
> > > putting '#' in front of line in /etc/inittab.
> >
> > Install file-rc. This will r
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:33:03PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Mark Suter wrote:
>
> > The only way under IPv4 be safe from spoofing is for everyone to
> > implement proper Network Ingress Filtering [RFC2827, BCP0038] on
> > their networks. Please, read this RFC.
> >
> >
thomas lakofski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tim Haynes wrote:
> Script kiddies generally don't know what's happened to them when
> portsentry triggers, and go looking for easier fodder
Random garbage traveling across the 'net is exactly this: Random
garbage.
> > Who says someone's going to go t
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Peter Cordes wrote:
> > bah. all this talk about portsentry being dangerous forgets that you can
> > also
> > run it so it only triggers after a full TCP connect. while not
> > un-spoofable,
> > it's very hard for an attacker to spoof as they have to be in-line between
>
On 29 Jan 2001, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> thomas lakofski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tim Haynes wrote:
> > Script kiddies generally don't know what's happened to them when
> > portsentry triggers, and go looking for easier fodder
>
> Random garbage traveling across the 'net is exactly this: Ra
[ Sune Kirkeby ]
> I don't know how or why, but it does _not_ clear the scroll-back
> buffer on my console, "chvt 63 ; reset -Q ; chvt 1" does though.
[ Ethan Benson ]
> you don't need the reset -Q there. the simple act of changing VCs
> clears the scrollback history.
[ Sune Kirkeby ]
> Sorry, m
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:06:56PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
> My bad. But the point seems moot, since if you're already able to squash
> traffic between the hosts you might as well do that instead of trying to
> induce
> a blocking response from portsentry. It's decidedly less trivial than
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Peter Cordes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:06:56PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
> > My bad. But the point seems moot, since if you're already able to squash
> > traffic between the hosts you might as well do that instead of trying to
> > induce
> > a blocking respon
Can u write in English pls? or don't write at all
thanks
> e2fsck ?? ??.
> ?? ?? ??
> ?? ... ??
> ?? ?? ??
Hi,
I have ipchains under Debian 2.2.
This firewall is compatible IPv6 ?
Thanks
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A
Of all the days, it was on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:35:57PM + that Tom Breza
quoth:
> Can u write in English pls? or don't write at all
Oh, the irony.
>
> thanks
>
> > e2fsck ÿþüþóðõàÃÂþûÃÂúþ ýð ýõÃÂúþûÃÂúþ üøÃÂ
Hi,
I have a Potato workstation with several services installed on it.
Thanks to links in /etc/rc?.d they start and stop automatically at
system startup/shutdown :-)
The problem is that I do not need all of them all the time - when I work
on certain subject I would like to switch other services
Hi Piotr,
Just use one of the free runlevels (4,5 even 2). Go to
/etc/rc and remove the links that you don't need and add the
ones you do. After that you can switch to that runlevel bij doing telinit
. All your services will be started and stopped for that
runlevel.
Good luck,
Eelco van Beek
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:16:13AM +0100, IC&S - Eelco van Beek wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
> Just use one of the free runlevels (4,5 even 2). Go to
> /etc/rc and remove the links that you don't need and add the
> ones you do. After that you can switch to that runlevel bij doing telinit
> . All your servic
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Mark Suter wrote:
> The only way under IPv4 be safe from spoofing is for everyone to
> implement proper Network Ingress Filtering [RFC2827, BCP0038] on
> their networks. Please, read this RFC.
>
> http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc2827.txt
bah. all this talk about portsentry
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:33:03PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
[]
> bah. all this talk about portsentry being dangerous forgets that you can
> also run it so it only triggers after a full TCP connect. while not
> un-spoofable, it's very hard for an attacker to spoof as they have to be
> in-li
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Tim Haynes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:33:03PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
>
> > bah. all this talk about portsentry being dangerous forgets that you can
> > also run it so it only triggers after a full TCP connect. while not
> > un-spoofable, it's very hard for a
Piotr Tarnowski wrote:
> What I did looks very tricky - I would prefer something similar to
> putting '#' in front of line in /etc/inittab.
Install file-rc. This will replace all those links with one configfile
(/etc/runlevel.conf). Put a '#' in front of lines in /etc/runlevel.conf.
--
/"\
Quoting Jürgen Dollinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Piotr Tarnowski wrote:
> > What I did looks very tricky - I would prefer something similar to
> > putting '#' in front of line in /etc/inittab.
>
> Install file-rc. This will replace all those links with one configfile
> (/etc/runlevel.conf). Put a
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:59:39 +, David Wright said:
> Quoting Jürgen Dollinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Piotr Tarnowski wrote:
> > > What I did looks very tricky - I would prefer something similar to
> > > putting '#' in front of line in /etc/inittab.
> >
> > Install file-rc. This will
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:33:03PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Mark Suter wrote:
>
> > The only way under IPv4 be safe from spoofing is for everyone to
> > implement proper Network Ingress Filtering [RFC2827, BCP0038] on
> > their networks. Please, read this RFC.
> >
> >
thomas lakofski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tim Haynes wrote:
> Script kiddies generally don't know what's happened to them when
> portsentry triggers, and go looking for easier fodder
Random garbage traveling across the 'net is exactly this: Random
garbage.
> > Who says someone's going to go
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Peter Cordes wrote:
> > bah. all this talk about portsentry being dangerous forgets that you can also
> > run it so it only triggers after a full TCP connect. while not un-spoofable,
> > it's very hard for an attacker to spoof as they have to be in-line between your
> > hos
On 29 Jan 2001, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> thomas lakofski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tim Haynes wrote:
> > Script kiddies generally don't know what's happened to them when
> > portsentry triggers, and go looking for easier fodder
>
> Random garbage traveling across the 'net is exactly this: R
[ Sune Kirkeby ]
> I don't know how or why, but it does _not_ clear the scroll-back
> buffer on my console, "chvt 63 ; reset -Q ; chvt 1" does though.
[ Ethan Benson ]
> you don't need the reset -Q there. the simple act of changing VCs
> clears the scrollback history.
[ Sune Kirkeby ]
> Sorry,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:06:56PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
> My bad. But the point seems moot, since if you're already able to squash
> traffic between the hosts you might as well do that instead of trying to induce
> a blocking response from portsentry. It's decidedly less trivial than se
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Peter Cordes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:06:56PM +, thomas lakofski wrote:
> > My bad. But the point seems moot, since if you're already able to squash
> > traffic between the hosts you might as well do that instead of trying to induce
> > a blocking response f
Can u write in English pls? or don't write at all
thanks
> e2fsck помогает только на несколько минут.
> Конешно с такими скудными данными трудно
>получить ответ ... но всетаки
> надеюсь у кого то было нечто подобное.
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hi,
I have ipchains under Debian 2.2.
This firewall is compatible IPv6 ?
Thanks
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Of all the days, it was on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:35:57PM + that Tom Breza quoth:
> Can u write in English pls? or don't write at all
Oh, the irony.
>
> thanks
>
> > e2fsck Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð°ÐµÑ ÑолÑко на неÑколÑко минÑÑ.
> > ÐонеÑно Ñ Ñакими ÑкÑднÑм
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 10:10:34PM +0100, NDSoftware wrote:
> I have ipchains under Debian 2.2.
> This firewall is compatible IPv6 ?
no, you must use netfilter
bastian
--
Each kiss is as the first.
-- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, "The Paradise Syndrome",
stardate
39 matches
Mail list logo
