Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Christian Pernegger wrote:
>
> > > What they are saying is that a machine *should* never recieve a packet that
> > > has originated from outside the machine, yet claims (by way of the source
> > > IP) to have originated from th
Quoting Christian Pernegger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > Volume 1 of Rich Stevens' TCP/IP Illustrated indicates that your thinking
> > is correct. It's in section 2.7, where the book discusses the loopback
> > interface. I'll quote from the book for bit here:
> > ---
> > Datagrams sent to a broa
> -Original Message-
> From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 5:41 PM
> To: Noah L. Meyerhans
> Cc: Christian Pernegger; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Have I misunderstood an ipchains concept?
>
>
> Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi!
There is a strange thing going on. eth0 and ppp0 services ar up, but I
can't ping anything, even modem on the second side of my line. I can't
even ping any computer in local network! Everything is typed in
/etc/network/services. ifconfig shows protocol. I don't know, what's
happening. It was w
Is your local (lo) interface configured? I've actually run into this
problem once. Also, send us a copy of your routing table "route -n" as
that might give clues to some of your problems.
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, ironhand wrote:
> Hi!
> There is a strange thing going on. eth0 and ppp0 services ar
I read of an article about redhat linux security, here is excerption about
atd
This scheduling daemon schedules "jobs" for later execution. You
could use at to tell atd to run "ps -ef > /root/jay " in two hours, just to
find out what processes are running then. Unfortu
Mo,
Red Hat security is always lousy ;)
Unlike Red Hat, Debian gets security bugs and such fixed in a timely
manner, especially if you are using the current `unstable' distribution
(which is presently `woody'); `at' should be fine. Be sure to get security
updates from security.debian.org if you
Hi Alexander!
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> Mo,
>
> Red Hat security is always lousy ;)
>
> Unlike Red Hat, Debian gets security bugs and such fixed in a timely
> manner, especially if you are using the current `unstable' distribution
> (which is presently `woody'); `at' shou
Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Christian Pernegger wrote:
>
> > > What they are saying is that a machine *should* never recieve a packet
> > > that
> > > has originated from outside the machine, yet claims (by way of the source
> > > IP) to have originated f
Quoting Christian Pernegger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > Volume 1 of Rich Stevens' TCP/IP Illustrated indicates that your thinking
> > is correct. It's in section 2.7, where the book discusses the loopback
> > interface. I'll quote from the book for bit here:
> > ---
> > Datagrams sent to a broad
> -Original Message-
> From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 5:41 PM
> To: Noah L. Meyerhans
> Cc: Christian Pernegger; debian-security@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Have I misunderstood an ipchains concept?
>
>
> Quoting Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL
Hi!
There is a strange thing going on. eth0 and ppp0 services ar up, but I
can't ping anything, even modem on the second side of my line. I can't
even ping any computer in local network! Everything is typed in
/etc/network/services. ifconfig shows protocol. I don't know, what's
happening. It was wo
Is your local (lo) interface configured? I've actually run into this
problem once. Also, send us a copy of your routing table "route -n" as
that might give clues to some of your problems.
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, ironhand wrote:
> Hi!
> There is a strange thing going on. eth0 and ppp0 services ar u
I read of an article about redhat linux security, here is excerption about
atd
This scheduling daemon schedules "jobs" for later execution. You
could use at to tell atd to run "ps -ef > /root/jay " in two hours, just to
find out what processes are running then. Unfortun
Mo,
Red Hat security is always lousy ;)
Unlike Red Hat, Debian gets security bugs and such fixed in a timely
manner, especially if you are using the current `unstable' distribution
(which is presently `woody'); `at' should be fine. Be sure to get security
updates from security.debian.org if you d
15 matches
Mail list logo
