Josh Frick, 2002-Mar-16 00:21 -0500:
> Yes, I most definitely was confused. Thank you for the clarification.
> I'm not familiar with the RFCs. My question, however, remains:
> aren't network addresses in that range supposed to be prevented from
> crossing (i.e. being routed) the internet?
Josh Frick, 2002-Mar-16 00:21 -0500:
> Yes, I most definitely was confused. Thank you for the clarification.
> I'm not familiar with the RFCs. My question, however, remains:
> aren't network addresses in that range supposed to be prevented from
> crossing (i.e. being routed) the internet
Josh Frick wrote:
>
> Yes, I most definitely was confused. Thank you for the clarification.
> I'm not familiar with the RFCs. My question, however, remains:
> aren't network addresses in that range supposed to be prevented from
> crossing (i.e. being routed) the internet? If they are, then
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:40:45AM -0500, Josh Frick wrote:
I thought class C networks were non-routable.
I think you're confused. First of all I think you're confused as to
what a class C network is, and second of all I think you're confused as
to what networks ar
Josh Frick wrote:
>
> Yes, I most definitely was confused. Thank you for the clarification.
> I'm not familiar with the RFCs. My question, however, remains:
> aren't network addresses in that range supposed to be prevented from
> crossing (i.e. being routed) the internet? If they are, then
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:40:45AM -0500, Josh Frick wrote:
>
>>I thought class C networks were non-routable.
>>
>
>I think you're confused. First of all I think you're confused as to
>what a class C network is, and second of all I think you're confused as
>to what netw
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:40:45AM -0500, Josh Frick wrote:
> >
> I thought class C networks were non-routable.
I think you're confused. First of all I think you're confused as to
what a class C network is, and second of all I think you're confused as
to what networks are non-routable and what it
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:40:45AM -0500, Josh Frick wrote:
> >
> I thought class C networks were non-routable.
I think you're confused. First of all I think you're confused as to
what a class C network is, and second of all I think you're confused as
to what networks are non-routable and what i
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Hal said:
I run a potato server on an ethernet behind a firewall connected by dsl to the
internet. The only service exposed is ftp, In the middle of last night ippl
reported an ftp connection attempt from 192.168.1,1 The network behind my
Stephen Gran wrote:
>This one time, at band camp, Hal said:
>
>>I run a potato server on an ethernet behind a firewall connected by dsl to the
>internet. The only service exposed is ftp, In the middle of last night ippl
>reported an ftp connection attempt from 192.168.1,1 The network behind
This one time, at band camp, Hal said:
> I run a potato server on an ethernet behind a firewall connected by dsl to
> the internet. The only service exposed is ftp, In the middle of last night
> ippl reported an ftp connection attempt from 192.168.1,1 The network behind
> my firewall uses 19
This one time, at band camp, Hal said:
> I run a potato server on an ethernet behind a firewall connected by dsl to the
>internet. The only service exposed is ftp, In the middle of last night ippl
>reported an ftp connection attempt from 192.168.1,1 The network behind my firewall
>uses 192.
I run a potato server on an ethernet behind a firewall connected by dsl to the
internet. The only service exposed is ftp, In the middle of last night ippl
reported an ftp connection attempt from 192.168.1,1 The network behind my
firewall uses 192.168.75.xx addressses for one Redhat and a cou
I run a potato server on an ethernet behind a firewall connected by dsl to the
internet. The only service exposed is ftp, In the middle of last night ippl reported
an ftp connection attempt from 192.168.1,1 The network behind my firewall uses
192.168.75.xx addressses for one Redhat and a co
14 matches
Mail list logo
